Ostwald Madeleine M, Smith Colleen, Allen Julie, Buetow Alec, Manner A Rosie, Guralnick Robert, Goldsmith Carys, Seltmann Katja C
Cheadle Center for Biodiversity & Ecological Restoration University of California, Santa Barbara Santa Barbara California USA.
Department of Biological Sciences Virginia Tech Blacksburg Virginia USA.
Ecol Evol. 2025 Jun 21;15(6):e71665. doi: 10.1002/ece3.71665. eCollection 2025 Jun.
Community or volunteer participation in research has the potential to significantly help mobilize the wealth of biodiversity and functional ecological data housed in natural history collections. Many such projects recruit community scientists to transcribe specimen label data from images; a next step is to task community scientists with conducting straightforward morphological measurements (e.g., body size) from specimen images. We investigated whether community science could be an effective approach to generating significant body size datasets from specimen images generated by museum digitization initiatives. Using the community science platform Notes from Nature, we engaged community scientists in a specimen measurement task to estimate body size (i.e., intertegular distance) from images of bee specimens. Community scientists showed high engagement and completion of this task, with each user measuring 43.6 specimens on average and self-reporting successful measurement of 98.0% of the images. Community scientist measurements were significantly larger than measurements conducted by trained researchers, though the average measurement error was only 2.3%. These results suggest that community science participation could be an effective approach for bee body size measurement, for descriptive studies or for research questions where this degree of expected error is deemed acceptable. For larger-bodied organisms (e.g., vertebrates), where modest measurement errors represent a smaller proportion of body size, community science approaches may be particularly effective. Methods we present here may serve as a blueprint for future projects aimed at engaging the public in biodiversity and collections-based research efforts.
社区或志愿者参与研究有潜力极大地助力调动自然历史馆藏中丰富的生物多样性和功能性生态数据。许多此类项目招募社区科学家从图像中转录标本标签数据;下一步是让社区科学家负责从标本图像中进行直接的形态测量(如体型大小)。我们调查了社区科学是否能成为一种有效的方法,用于从博物馆数字化项目生成的标本图像中获取大量体型数据集。利用社区科学平台“自然笔记”,我们让社区科学家参与一项标本测量任务,从蜜蜂标本图像中估算体型大小(即翅基距)。社区科学家对这项任务表现出了高度参与度且完成情况良好,每位用户平均测量了43.6个标本,且自我报告成功测量了98.0%的图像。尽管平均测量误差仅为2.3%,但社区科学家的测量结果显著大于受过训练的研究人员的测量结果。这些结果表明,社区科学参与可能是一种有效的蜜蜂体型测量方法,适用于描述性研究或对于预期误差程度可接受的研究问题。对于体型较大的生物(如脊椎动物),适度的测量误差在体型中所占比例较小,社区科学方法可能会特别有效。我们在此介绍的方法可作为未来旨在让公众参与生物多样性和基于馆藏的研究工作的项目的蓝图。