• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

《被倾听与理解感受量表》日文版的编制:门诊患者中的信效度研究

Development of a Japanese Version of the Feeling Heard and Understood Scale: Reliability and Validity in Outpatients.

作者信息

Takahashi Miki, Hirayama Hideyuki, Aoyama Maho, Miyashita Mitsunori

机构信息

Department of Palliative Nursing, Health Sciences, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan.

Department of Gerontological Nursing, Health Sciences, Yamagata Prefectural University, Yamagata, Japan.

出版信息

J Patient Exp. 2025 Jun 19;12:23743735251348847. doi: 10.1177/23743735251348847. eCollection 2025.

DOI:10.1177/23743735251348847
PMID:40547401
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12179446/
Abstract

The Feeling Heard and Understood (FHU) scale evaluates communication between patients and healthcare providers to measure patient-centered care from the patient's perspective. This study aimed to develop a Japanese version of the FHU (FHU-J). Three researchers translated the original scale, and cognitive interviews with 10 hospitalized patients ensured face validity. The survey items were back-translated and approved by the original authors. Two web-based surveys were conducted one week apart to assess the FHU-J's internal consistency, concurrent validity, and test-retest reliability that targeted adults hospitalized for over a week in the past year. The first and second surveys included 608 and 255 respondents, respectively (50.4% men; mean age: 57.0). Surgery was the primary reason for admission (48.1%). The Cronbach α for the FHU-J was .93, and the intraclass correlation coefficient between the 2 responses was 0.54. Cronbach α and correlation coefficients demonstrated sufficient validity of the FHU-J, whereas the intraclass correlation coefficient indicated moderate reliability.

摘要

“被倾听与理解感受量表”(FHU)从患者角度评估患者与医疗服务提供者之间的沟通,以衡量以患者为中心的护理。本研究旨在开发该量表的日语版本(FHU-J)。三名研究人员翻译了原始量表,并对10名住院患者进行认知访谈以确保表面效度。调查项目经反向翻译并得到原始作者认可。相隔一周进行了两项基于网络的调查,以评估FHU-J的内部一致性、同时效度和重测信度,目标是过去一年住院一周以上的成年人。第一次和第二次调查分别有608名和255名受访者(男性占50.4%;平均年龄:57.0岁)。手术是入院的主要原因(48.1%)。FHU-J的克朗巴哈α系数为0.93,两次回答之间的组内相关系数为0.54。克朗巴哈α系数和相关系数表明FHU-J具有足够的效度,而组内相关系数表明其信度中等。

相似文献

1
Development of a Japanese Version of the Feeling Heard and Understood Scale: Reliability and Validity in Outpatients.《被倾听与理解感受量表》日文版的编制:门诊患者中的信效度研究
J Patient Exp. 2025 Jun 19;12:23743735251348847. doi: 10.1177/23743735251348847. eCollection 2025.
2
Psychometric properties of the Chinese version of the pros and cons of anorexia nervosa (P-CAN-C) scale: a validation study in patients with anorexia nervosa.神经性厌食症利弊中文版量表(P-CAN-C)的心理测量学特性:一项针对神经性厌食症患者的效度研究
J Eat Disord. 2025 Jun 16;13(1):111. doi: 10.1186/s40337-025-01314-x.
3
Psychometric validation and interpretation thresholds of the Hidradenitis Suppurativa Quality of Life (HiSQOL©) questionnaire using pooled data from the phase III BE HEARD I & II trials of bimekizumab in hidradenitis suppurativa.使用比美吉珠单抗治疗化脓性汗腺炎的III期BE HEARD I和II试验的汇总数据,对化脓性汗腺炎生活质量(HiSQOL©)问卷进行心理测量学验证和解释阈值分析。
Br J Dermatol. 2025 Jun 20;193(1):93-104. doi: 10.1093/bjd/ljaf067.
4
Development and Validation of an Entrustable Professional Activity-Based Assessment Scale for Nurse Practitioners in Taiwan.台湾执业护士基于可托付专业活动的评估量表的开发与验证
J Nurs Res. 2025 Aug 1;33(4):e399. doi: 10.1097/jnr.0000000000000682.
5
Psychometric Evaluation of the Persian Version of the Professional Socialization Scale for Hospital Nurses: A Methodological Study.医院护士专业社会化量表波斯语版本的心理测量学评估:一项方法学研究
SAGE Open Nurs. 2025 Jun 19;11:23779608251345276. doi: 10.1177/23779608251345276. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec.
6
Italian validation of the credibility/expectancy questionnaire in spinal pain: a useful tool for clinicians and physiotherapist (CEQ-I).意大利对脊柱疼痛可信度/预期问卷的验证:临床医生和物理治疗师的有用工具(CEQ-I)
Ther Adv Chronic Dis. 2025 Jun 21;16:20406223251324812. doi: 10.1177/20406223251324812. eCollection 2025.
7
Development and Preliminary Evaluation of a Food Literacy Measure for Use With Young People in Canada.加拿大青少年食品素养测量方法的开发与初步评估
J Acad Nutr Diet. 2025 Jul;125(7):1009-1023. doi: 10.1016/j.jand.2024.10.021. Epub 2024 Nov 4.
8
Validity and Reliability Study of the Turkish Version of the Surgical Recovery Scale.《手术恢复量表土耳其语版的效度与信度研究》
J Perianesth Nurs. 2025 Jun 20. doi: 10.1016/j.jopan.2025.01.023.
9
Voice Handicap Index-10 (VHI-10): Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Validation of the Azerbaijani-Turkish Version.嗓音障碍指数-10(VHI-10):阿塞拜疆-土耳其语版本的跨文化调适与验证
J Voice. 2025 Jun 18. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2025.05.025.
10
Shared decision making: developing the OPTION scale for measuring patient involvement.共同决策:开发用于衡量患者参与度的OPTION量表。
Qual Saf Health Care. 2003 Apr;12(2):93-9. doi: 10.1136/qhc.12.2.93.

本文引用的文献

1
The Effects of Patient-Centered Communication on Patient Engagement, Health-Related Quality of Life, Service Quality Perception and Patient Satisfaction in Patients with Cancer: A Cross-Sectional Study in Türkiye.以患者为中心的沟通对癌症患者的参与度、健康相关生活质量、服务质量感知和患者满意度的影响:土耳其的一项横断面研究。
Cancer Control. 2024 Jan-Dec;31:10732748241236327. doi: 10.1177/10732748241236327.
2
Harmful communication behaviors in cancer care: A systematic review of patients and family caregivers perspectives.癌症护理中的有害沟通行为:对患者及家庭照顾者观点的系统评价
Psychooncology. 2023 Dec;32(12):1827-1838. doi: 10.1002/pon.6247. Epub 2023 Nov 13.
3
Use of a Person-Centered Narrative Intervention in an Outpatient Palliative Care Setting: A Feasibility Study.以患者为中心的叙事干预在门诊姑息治疗环境中的应用:一项可行性研究。
J Patient Exp. 2023 Sep 18;10:23743735231202729. doi: 10.1177/23743735231202729. eCollection 2023.
4
The effect of palliative care team intervention and symptom improvement using patient-reported outcomes: a multicenter prospective observational study.姑息治疗团队干预和使用患者报告结局改善症状的效果:一项多中心前瞻性观察研究。
Support Care Cancer. 2023 Jul 3;31(7):439. doi: 10.1007/s00520-023-07912-2.
5
Spiritual well-being correlates with quality of life of both cancer and non-cancer patients in palliative care - further validation of EORTC QLQ-SWB32 in Finnish.在姑息治疗中,精神幸福感与癌症和非癌症患者的生活质量相关——EORTC QLQ-SWB32 在芬兰的进一步验证。
BMC Palliat Care. 2023 Mar 30;22(1):33. doi: 10.1186/s12904-023-01153-0.
6
Patient-Reported Quality Measures for Palliative Care: The Time is now.患者报告的姑息治疗质量衡量指标:现在是时候了。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2023 Feb;65(2):87-100. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2022.11.001. Epub 2022 Nov 15.
7
A novel Scale to Assess Palliative Care Patients' Experience of Feeling Heard and Understood.一种评估姑息治疗患者被倾听和理解感受的新型量表。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2022 May;63(5):689-697.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2022.01.002. Epub 2022 Jan 10.
8
A literature-based study of patient-centered care and communication in nurse-patient interactions: barriers, facilitators, and the way forward.一项基于文献的关于护患互动中以患者为中心的护理与沟通的研究:障碍、促进因素及未来方向。
BMC Nurs. 2021 Sep 3;20(1):158. doi: 10.1186/s12912-021-00684-2.
9
Development and psychometric properties of the Japanese Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems Clinician & Group Survey (CG-CAHPS).日本医疗保健提供者和系统消费者评估临床医生和小组调查(CG-CAHPS)的开发和心理测量特性。
PLoS One. 2021 Apr 28;16(4):e0250843. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0250843. eCollection 2021.
10
The mediating effect of trust on the relationship between doctor-patient communication and patients' risk perception during treatment.信任在医患沟通与治疗期间患者风险感知关系中的中介作用。
Psych J. 2020 Jun;9(3):383-391. doi: 10.1002/pchj.327. Epub 2019 Dec 3.