Sabo Robert D, Clark Christopher M, Bash Jesse, Sobota Daniel, Cooter Ellen, Dobrowolski James P, Houlton Benjamin Z, Rea Anne, Schwede Donna, Morford Scott L, Compton Jana E
Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education, United States Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, National Center for Environmental Assessment, U.S. EPA, Washington, DC, USA.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, National Center for Environmental Assessment, U.S. EPA, Washington, DC, USA.
J Geophys Res Biogeosci. 2019 Oct 6;124(10):3104-3124. doi: 10.1029/2019JG005110.
The effectiveness of policies and management actions in reducing the release of excess nitrogen (N) to the environment is best assessed if N fluxes across air, land, and water are regularly quantified at relevant scales. Here we compiled 2002, 2007, and 2012 inventories of inputs and nonhydrologic N outputs along with fossil fuel emissions, food demand, and terrestrial N surpluses for all subbasins of the contiguous United States using peer-reviewed, publicly available data sets. We found that at the national scale, total inputs, outputs, and surpluses changed little (±6%) between 2002 and 2012 and remained dominated by agricultural processes, despite efforts to curb N losses. This consistency at the national scale, however, obscured large counteracting shifts at regional levels driven by variable fluxes across regions. Throughout the eastern United States, declines in deposition and fertilizer inputs combined with increased crop yields resulted in a decrease in terrestrial N surpluses, which may explain recent water quality improvements in the region. On the other hand, fertilizer N inputs in the Midwest increased at a greater rate than crop harvest N increased, leading to a larger terrestrial surplus N. A large relative increase (~320%) in N emissions in the West due to an unusual wildfire season in 2012 was also observed. These changes coincided with national policies that decreased N emissions and increased demand for domestic biofuels, potentially highlighting the capacity to change the source and magnitude of N inputs and fluxes across the landscape through market and regulatory actions.
如果能在相关尺度上定期对空气、陆地和水体中的氮通量进行量化,那么就能最好地评估政策和管理行动在减少向环境中过量释放氮方面的有效性。在此,我们利用经过同行评审的公开数据集,编制了2002年、2007年和2012年美国本土所有子流域的氮输入和非水文氮输出清单,以及化石燃料排放、食物需求和陆地氮盈余情况。我们发现,在国家尺度上,尽管采取了减少氮损失的措施,但2002年至2012年间,总输入、输出和盈余变化不大(±6%),且仍以农业过程为主导。然而,国家尺度上的这种一致性掩盖了区域层面由各区域通量变化驱动的巨大抵消性变化。在美国东部,沉降和化肥输入的减少以及作物产量的增加导致陆地氮盈余减少,这可能解释了该地区近期水质的改善。另一方面,中西部地区化肥氮输入的增长速度超过了作物收获氮的增长速度,导致陆地氮盈余更大。此外,2012年因异常野火季节,西部地区的氮排放量相对大幅增加(约320%)。这些变化与减少氮排放和增加国内生物燃料需求的国家政策相吻合,这可能凸显了通过市场和监管行动改变景观中氮输入和通量的来源及规模的能力。