• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

调查欧洲公众对研究参与的多样性:谁参加了爱尔兰、英国和马耳他的欧洲研究人员之夜?

Investigating diversity in European audiences for public engagement with research: Who attends European Researchers' Night in Ireland, the UK and Malta?

机构信息

Qualia Analytics, Dublin, Ireland.

Institute for Methods Innovation, Arcata, California, United States of America.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2021 Jul 14;16(7):e0252854. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0252854. eCollection 2021.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0252854
PMID:34260628
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8279411/
Abstract

European Researchers' Night is an annual pan-European synchronized event devoted to public engagement with research. It was first held in 2005 and now occurs in over 400 cities across Europe, with the aim of bringing researchers closer to the general public. To investigate social inclusion in these events, we conducted survey research across three national contexts (Ireland, Malta and the UK) and events in seven cities between 2016 and 2019 (n = 1590). The results from this exploratory descriptive study confirmed one hypothesis, namely that event attendees had substantially higher levels of university qualification than the national publics. This is in line with wider patterns of unequal participation in public engagement with research activities based on socio-economic status. However, we also found mixed evidence on the prevalence of ethnic minority representation among event attendees compared to the general population, thus failing to uphold the second hypothesis that predicted an over-representation of white majority participants. This second finding diverges from existing research findings about ethnic diversity amongst science communication audiences, raising the possibility that some public engagement events are over-performing on this dimension of social inclusion. Overall, the findings demonstrate that European Researchers' Night has potential for addressing the critical goal of enhancing the diversity of audiences for public engagement with research, even as it falls short on the key metric of socio-economic diversity.

摘要

欧洲研究人员之夜是一年一度的泛欧同步活动,致力于公众与研究的互动。它于 2005 年首次举办,现在在欧洲 400 多个城市举行,旨在让研究人员更接近公众。为了研究这些活动中的社会包容,我们在三个国家背景(爱尔兰、马耳他和英国)和 2016 年至 2019 年的七个城市进行了调查研究(n=1590)。这项探索性描述性研究的结果证实了一个假设,即活动参与者的大学学历水平明显高于全国公众。这与基于社会经济地位的研究活动公众参与不平等的更广泛模式一致。然而,我们也发现了关于活动参与者与总人口相比少数民族代表性的混合证据,因此未能支持第二个假设,即预测白人多数参与者的代表性过高。这第二个发现与关于科学传播受众的种族多样性的现有研究结果不同,这增加了一些公众参与活动在社会包容这一方面表现过度的可能性。总的来说,研究结果表明,欧洲研究人员之夜有可能实现增强公众参与研究的受众多样性的关键目标,尽管它在社会经济多样性的关键指标上有所欠缺。

相似文献

1
Investigating diversity in European audiences for public engagement with research: Who attends European Researchers' Night in Ireland, the UK and Malta?调查欧洲公众对研究参与的多样性:谁参加了爱尔兰、英国和马耳他的欧洲研究人员之夜?
PLoS One. 2021 Jul 14;16(7):e0252854. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0252854. eCollection 2021.
2
How does moving public engagement with research online change audience diversity? Comparing inclusion indicators for 2019 & 2020 European Researchers' night events.线上开展公众参与研究活动如何改变受众多样性?比较 2019 年和 2020 年欧洲研究人员之夜活动的包容性指标。
PLoS One. 2022 Mar 11;17(3):e0262834. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0262834. eCollection 2022.
3
Facilitating the recruitment of minority ethnic people into research: qualitative case study of South Asians and asthma.促进少数族裔人群参与研究:南亚人与哮喘的定性案例研究
PLoS Med. 2009 Oct;6(10):e1000148. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000148. Epub 2009 Oct 13.
4
B!RTH: a mixed-methods survey of audience members' reflections of a global women's health arts and science programme in England, Ireland, Scotland and Switzerland.诞生:一项关于英格兰、爱尔兰、苏格兰和瑞士观众对全球女性健康艺术与科学项目反馈的混合方法调查。
BMJ Open. 2019 Dec 30;9(12):e027531. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-027531.
5
A registered report survey of open research practices in psychology departments in the UK and Ireland.英国和爱尔兰心理学系开放研究实践的注册报告调查。
Br J Psychol. 2024 Aug;115(3):497-534. doi: 10.1111/bjop.12700. Epub 2024 Mar 22.
6
Underrepresentation of ethnic minorities in hypertension research-a survey of enablers and barriers among South Asian and African communities in Glasgow.少数族裔在高血压研究中的代表性不足——格拉斯哥南亚和非裔社区促进因素和障碍的调查。
Trials. 2022 Jul 29;23(1):609. doi: 10.1186/s13063-022-06542-z.
7
Smoking prevalence and the changing risk profiles in the UK ethnic and migrant minority populations: implications for stop smoking services.英国少数族裔和移民人群中的吸烟流行率和不断变化的风险特征:对戒烟服务的影响。
Public Health. 2014 Mar;128(3):297-306. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2013.12.013. Epub 2014 Mar 4.
8
Health researchers' attitudes towards public involvement in health research.健康研究人员对公众参与健康研究的态度。
Health Expect. 2009 Jun;12(2):209-20. doi: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2009.00532.x. Epub 2009 Apr 22.
9
Smoking-related attitudes and perceptions among young adults in Malta and the UK.马耳他和英国年轻人对吸烟的态度和看法。
Psychol Health Med. 2010 May;15(3):347-56. doi: 10.1080/13548501003653200.
10
Mortality, ethnicity, and country of birth on a national scale, 2001-2013: A retrospective cohort (Scottish Health and Ethnicity Linkage Study).2001-2013 年全国范围内的死亡率、种族和出生地:一项回顾性队列研究(苏格兰健康和种族关联研究)。
PLoS Med. 2018 Mar 1;15(3):e1002515. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002515. eCollection 2018 Mar.

引用本文的文献

1
Responsible research impact: Ethics for making a difference.负责任的研究影响:创造改变的伦理准则。
Open Res Eur. 2025 Mar 31;5:92. doi: 10.12688/openreseurope.19649.1. eCollection 2025.
2
Medical students' interest in research: changing trends during university training.医学生对研究的兴趣:大学培训期间的变化趋势
Front Med (Lausanne). 2023 Oct 19;10:1257574. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1257574. eCollection 2023.
3
How are public engagement health festivals evaluated? A systematic review with narrative synthesis.公众参与健康节如何评估?系统评价与叙述性综合。
PLoS One. 2022 Aug 23;17(8):e0267158. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0267158. eCollection 2022.
4
How does moving public engagement with research online change audience diversity? Comparing inclusion indicators for 2019 & 2020 European Researchers' night events.线上开展公众参与研究活动如何改变受众多样性?比较 2019 年和 2020 年欧洲研究人员之夜活动的包容性指标。
PLoS One. 2022 Mar 11;17(3):e0262834. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0262834. eCollection 2022.
5
Public attitudes to the use of remote data collection in clinical research.公众对临床研究中使用远程数据采集的态度。
Contemp Clin Trials. 2021 Dec;111:106595. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2021.106595. Epub 2021 Oct 13.

本文引用的文献

1
Reimagining publics and (non) participation: Exploring exclusion from science communication through the experiences of low-income, minority ethnic groups.重新构想公众与(非)参与:通过低收入少数族裔群体的经历探索科学传播中的排斥现象。
Public Underst Sci. 2018 Oct;27(7):772-786. doi: 10.1177/0963662517750072. Epub 2018 Jan 10.
2
Why people attend science festivals: Interests, motivations and self-reported benefits of public engagement with research.人们参加科学节的原因:公众参与科研的兴趣、动机及自我报告的益处。
Public Underst Sci. 2014 Jul;23(5):557-73. doi: 10.1177/0963662512458624.
3
Science's new social contract with society.科学与社会的新社会契约。
Nature. 1999 Dec 2;402(6761 Suppl):C81-4. doi: 10.1038/35011576.