• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

印度已婚男性接受输精管切除术的障碍:一项系统综述。

Barriers to acceptance of vasectomy among married males in India: A systematic review.

作者信息

Biswas Koushik, Arias-Urueña Liliana, Fearon David

机构信息

Department of Biochemistry, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Raebareli, Uttar Pradesh, India.

Usher Institute, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.

出版信息

J Family Med Prim Care. 2025 May;14(5):1617-1626. doi: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_1785_24. Epub 2025 May 31.

DOI:10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_1785_24
PMID:40547768
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12178483/
Abstract

Vasectomy was introduced under the National Family Planning Programme in 1954 to enhance male participation in family planning in India. Despite adopting the non-scalpel technique in 1992 to popularise vasectomy, its acceptance among married couples has declined from 3.31% to 0.3% over the past 3 decades. This study aims to identify the barriers among the married male population in India for adopting vasectomy as a method of family planning. This systematic review was conducted following PRISMA guidelines after PROSPERO registration (CRD42023434518). Six electronic databases (MEDLINE, Embase, Global Health, Allied and Complementary Medicine, APA PsycInfo, and CAB Abstracts Archive) were searched using terms including "vasectomy", "barriers", and "India" for studies reporting the barriers to accepting vasectomy as a family planning method. Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed-method studies on Indian male populations, reported in English and published up to May 2023, were included. Quality assessments were conducted using the JBI Critical Appraisal Tools. Extracted data were analysed using a thematic synthesis. Twenty-four studies conducted across India were included in the systematic review (18 cross-sectional, 2 interview-based, 2 mixed-method, 1 case-control and 1 focus group discussion-based). Five themes of barriers were identified: fear, social issues, cultural issues, knowledge, and health system issues. Men feared undergoing a surgical procedure for sterilisation. They presumed the procedure would lead to loss of libido, physical weakness leading to income loss, and social stigma from community members. Health education and financial incentives are likely to increase vasectomy acceptance in India.

摘要

1954年,输精管切除术在国家计划生育计划下被引入,以提高印度男性在计划生育中的参与度。尽管在1992年采用了非手术刀技术来推广输精管切除术,但在过去30年里,已婚夫妇对它的接受率已从3.31%降至0.3%。本研究旨在确定印度已婚男性人群中采用输精管切除术作为计划生育方法的障碍。在PROSPERO注册(CRD42023434518)后,按照PRISMA指南进行了这项系统评价。使用包括“输精管切除术”“障碍”和“印度”等术语,在六个电子数据库(MEDLINE、Embase、全球健康、补充与替代医学、美国心理学会心理学文摘数据库和CAB文摘数据库)中搜索报告接受输精管切除术作为计划生育方法的障碍的研究。纳入了2023年5月之前以英文发表的关于印度男性人群的定性、定量和混合方法研究。使用JBI批判性评价工具进行质量评估。提取的数据采用主题综合法进行分析。系统评价纳入了在印度各地进行的24项研究(18项横断面研究、2项基于访谈的研究、2项混合方法研究、1项病例对照研究和1项基于焦点小组讨论的研究)。确定了五个障碍主题:恐惧、社会问题、文化问题、知识和卫生系统问题。男性害怕接受绝育手术。他们认为该手术会导致性欲丧失、身体虚弱导致收入损失以及受到社区成员给予的社会耻辱。健康教育和经济激励措施可能会提高印度对输精管切除术的接受度。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4e32/12178483/567f3cefeaf8/JFMPC-14-1617-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4e32/12178483/567f3cefeaf8/JFMPC-14-1617-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4e32/12178483/567f3cefeaf8/JFMPC-14-1617-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Barriers to acceptance of vasectomy among married males in India: A systematic review.印度已婚男性接受输精管切除术的障碍:一项系统综述。
J Family Med Prim Care. 2025 May;14(5):1617-1626. doi: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_1785_24. Epub 2025 May 31.
2
Survivor, family and professional experiences of psychosocial interventions for sexual abuse and violence: a qualitative evidence synthesis.性虐待和暴力的心理社会干预的幸存者、家庭和专业人员的经验:定性证据综合。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Oct 4;10(10):CD013648. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013648.pub2.
3
Eliciting adverse effects data from participants in clinical trials.从临床试验参与者中获取不良反应数据。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jan 16;1(1):MR000039. doi: 10.1002/14651858.MR000039.pub2.
4
Barriers and facilitators to access mental health services among refugee women in high-income countries: a systematic review.高收入国家难民女性获得心理健康服务的障碍和促进因素:系统评价。
Syst Rev. 2022 Apr 6;11(1):62. doi: 10.1186/s13643-022-01936-1.
5
Community views on mass drug administration for soil-transmitted helminths: a qualitative evidence synthesis.社区对土壤传播蠕虫群体药物给药的看法:定性证据综合分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Jun 20;6:CD015794. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015794.pub2.
6
How lived experiences of illness trajectories, burdens of treatment, and social inequalities shape service user and caregiver participation in health and social care: a theory-informed qualitative evidence synthesis.疾病轨迹的生活经历、治疗负担和社会不平等如何影响服务使用者和照顾者参与健康和社会护理:一项基于理论的定性证据综合分析
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 Jun;13(24):1-120. doi: 10.3310/HGTQ8159.
7
Factors that influence parents' and informal caregivers' views and practices regarding routine childhood vaccination: a qualitative evidence synthesis.影响父母和非正式照顾者对常规儿童疫苗接种看法和做法的因素:定性证据综合分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Oct 27;10(10):CD013265. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013265.pub2.
8
Effects of consumers and health providers working in partnership on health services planning, delivery and evaluation.消费者和医疗服务提供者合作对卫生服务规划、提供和评估的影响。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Sep 15;9(9):CD013373. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013373.pub2.
9
Incentives for preventing smoking in children and adolescents.预防儿童和青少年吸烟的激励措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Jun 6;6(6):CD008645. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008645.pub3.
10
eHealth interventions for parents in neonatal intensive care units: a systematic review.针对新生儿重症监护病房家长的电子健康干预措施:一项系统综述
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2017 Dec;15(12):2981-3005. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2017-003439.

本文引用的文献

1
Barriers to vasectomy acceptance and uptake in Nigeria: A review of the literature.在尼日利亚,接受和进行输精管结扎术的障碍:文献综述。
Afr J Reprod Health. 2022 Mar;26(3):37-45. doi: 10.29063/ajrh2022/v26i3.5.
2
Disappearing male sterilization in India: do we care?印度男性绝育手术的式微:我们在意吗?
Contracept Reprod Med. 2023 May 4;8(1):31. doi: 10.1186/s40834-023-00228-w.
3
Down But Not Out: Vasectomy Is Faring Poorly Almost Everywhere-We Can Do Better To Make It A True Method Option.虽受阻但未被弃:输精管切除术在各地表现不佳——我们可以做得更好,使其成为真正的方法选择。
Glob Health Sci Pract. 2023 Feb 28;11(1). doi: 10.9745/GHSP-D-22-00369.
4
Male involvement in family planning in a rural area of India.印度农村地区男性参与计划生育情况。
J Family Med Prim Care. 2022 May;11(5):1943-1948. doi: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_1557_21. Epub 2022 May 14.
5
The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews.PRISMA 2020 声明:系统评价报告的更新指南。
BMJ. 2021 Mar 29;372:n71. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n71.
6
Factors explaining the dominion status of female sterilization in India over the past two decades (1992-2016): A multilevel study.过去二十年来(1992-2016 年)解释印度女性绝育主导地位的因素:一项多层次研究。
PLoS One. 2021 Mar 10;16(3):e0246530. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0246530. eCollection 2021.
7
Perception of family planning and reasons for low acceptance of NSV among married males of urban slums of Lucknow city - A community based study.勒克瑙市城市贫民窟已婚男性对计划生育的认知及对新型绝育法接受度低的原因——一项基于社区的研究
J Family Med Prim Care. 2020 Jan 28;9(1):303-309. doi: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_779_19. eCollection 2020 Jan.
8
Male Perception and Participation in Family Planning Among Tribal Communities of Maharashtra, India: A Mixed-Method Study.印度马哈拉施特拉邦部落社区男性对计划生育的认知与参与:一项混合方法研究。
Int Q Community Health Educ. 2020 Apr;40(3):163-169. doi: 10.1177/0272684X19875017. Epub 2019 Sep 6.
9
Knowledge, attitude, and practice of family planning services among healthcare workers in Kashmir - A cross-sectional study.克什米尔地区医护人员对计划生育服务的认知、态度及实践——一项横断面研究
J Family Med Prim Care. 2019 Apr;8(4):1319-1325. doi: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_96_19.
10
A Cross-sectional Study of Gender-Based Violence against Men in the Rural Area of Haryana, India.印度哈里亚纳邦农村地区针对男性的性别暴力横断面研究。
Indian J Community Med. 2019 Jan-Mar;44(1):35-38. doi: 10.4103/ijcm.IJCM_222_18.