• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项针对多样化队列研究中的参与、招募以及数据和样本收集的快速创新模型:来自参与实验室的见解

A Model for Rapid Innovation for Engagement, Enrollment, and Data and Sample Collection in a Diverse Cohort Study: Insights from Participant Labs.

作者信息

Ter Meer Janna, Chen Jessica, Foster-Bonds Romina, Goosen Andrea, Valensky Gayle, Dinh-Luong Ethan, Peterson Rachele, Ginsburg Geoffrey, Lunt Chris, Kheterpal Vik, Topol Eric, Mandich Allison, Huyen Yentram, Vogel Julia Moore

机构信息

Scripps Research Translational Institute, Scripps Research, La Jolla, CA.

All of Us Research Program, Division of Program Coordination, Planning, and Strategic Initiatives, Office of the Director, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD.

出版信息

Mayo Clin Proc Digit Health. 2025 May 21;3(3):100227. doi: 10.1016/j.mcpdig.2025.100227. eCollection 2025 Sep.

DOI:10.1016/j.mcpdig.2025.100227
PMID:40548175
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12179602/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To improve engagement and retention of a cohort that reflects the US population within the Research Program, we created and implemented an innovation infrastructure and initiatives.

PARTICIPANTS AND METHODS

participant laboratories (APLs) established innovation-specific processes to rapidly ideate, select, implement, and evaluate cost-effective innovative initiatives, while mitigating risks. This was done within 4 priority areas: accelerating enrollment, enhancing engagement and retention, improving biospecimen collection, and broadening data types. Participants within the Research Program were engaged in this research between April 6, 2022 and May 6, 2024.

RESULTS

We present a summary of APL processes and portfolio along with 5 specific initiatives that rapidly tested innovative ways to increase task completion and broaden biospecimen submission accessibility. Each initiative's cost-benefit profile was evaluated by a committee of program leadership. Findings include the following: (1) offering compensation increased task completion, the degree of which was dependent on the context and amount of compensation; and (2) adding evening and weekend blood donation appointment times and distributing saliva collection kits through community partners increased donations from participants who have been historically underrepresented in biomedical research. On average, program staff predicted initiative effect sizes would be more than double their actual effect.

CONCLUSION

We found that large research studies can rapidly innovate to meet program goals, including a focus on diversity. We identified specific strategies and tactics to improve health research engagement and retention, with a focus on historically underrepresented in biomedical research communities, which can be used by numerous health research studies.

摘要

目的

为了提高研究项目中能反映美国人口特征的队列的参与度和留存率,我们创建并实施了一个创新基础设施和多项举措。

参与者与方法

参与项目的实验室(APL)建立了特定于创新的流程,以快速构思、选择、实施和评估具有成本效益的创新举措,同时降低风险。这在四个优先领域内进行:加快入组速度、提高参与度和留存率、改善生物样本采集以及拓宽数据类型。研究项目的参与者在2022年4月6日至2024年5月6日期间参与了本研究。

结果

我们展示了APL流程和项目组合的总结,以及5项具体举措,这些举措快速测试了创新方法以提高任务完成率并拓宽生物样本提交的可及性。每个举措的成本效益概况由项目领导层委员会进行评估。研究结果包括:(1)提供补偿提高了任务完成率,其程度取决于补偿的背景和金额;(2)增加晚间和周末的献血预约时间,并通过社区合作伙伴分发唾液采集试剂盒,增加了历来在生物医学研究中代表性不足的参与者的捐赠。平均而言,项目工作人员预测举措的效应大小将是其实际效应的两倍多。

结论

我们发现大型研究可以迅速创新以实现项目目标,包括关注多样性。我们确定了提高健康研究参与度和留存率的具体策略和方法,重点关注在生物医学研究社区中历来代表性不足的群体,众多健康研究均可采用这些策略和方法。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d229/12179602/de514f10470d/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d229/12179602/0e10de5f9625/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d229/12179602/5d84fd6bca9a/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d229/12179602/de514f10470d/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d229/12179602/0e10de5f9625/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d229/12179602/5d84fd6bca9a/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d229/12179602/de514f10470d/gr3.jpg

相似文献

1
A Model for Rapid Innovation for Engagement, Enrollment, and Data and Sample Collection in a Diverse Cohort Study: Insights from Participant Labs.一项针对多样化队列研究中的参与、招募以及数据和样本收集的快速创新模型:来自参与实验室的见解
Mayo Clin Proc Digit Health. 2025 May 21;3(3):100227. doi: 10.1016/j.mcpdig.2025.100227. eCollection 2025 Sep.
2
Behavioral interventions to reduce risk for sexual transmission of HIV among men who have sex with men.降低男男性行为者中艾滋病毒性传播风险的行为干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008 Jul 16(3):CD001230. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001230.pub2.
3
Sertindole for schizophrenia.用于治疗精神分裂症的舍吲哚。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005 Jul 20;2005(3):CD001715. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001715.pub2.
4
A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of paclitaxel, docetaxel, gemcitabine and vinorelbine in non-small-cell lung cancer.对紫杉醇、多西他赛、吉西他滨和长春瑞滨在非小细胞肺癌中的临床疗效和成本效益进行的快速系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(32):1-195. doi: 10.3310/hta5320.
5
Survivor, family and professional experiences of psychosocial interventions for sexual abuse and violence: a qualitative evidence synthesis.性虐待和暴力的心理社会干预的幸存者、家庭和专业人员的经验:定性证据综合。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Oct 4;10(10):CD013648. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013648.pub2.
6
Immunogenicity and seroefficacy of pneumococcal conjugate vaccines: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.肺炎球菌结合疫苗的免疫原性和血清效力:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
Health Technol Assess. 2024 Jul;28(34):1-109. doi: 10.3310/YWHA3079.
7
How to Implement Digital Clinical Consultations in UK Maternity Care: the ARM@DA Realist Review.如何在英国产科护理中实施数字临床会诊:ARM@DA实证主义综述
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 May 21:1-77. doi: 10.3310/WQFV7425.
8
Rapid, point-of-care antigen tests for diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection.用于 SARS-CoV-2 感染诊断的快速、即时抗原检测。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Jul 22;7(7):CD013705. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013705.pub3.
9
The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of enzyme replacement therapy for Gaucher's disease: a systematic review.戈谢病酶替代疗法的临床疗效和成本效益:一项系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2006 Jul;10(24):iii-iv, ix-136. doi: 10.3310/hta10240.
10
Signs and symptoms to determine if a patient presenting in primary care or hospital outpatient settings has COVID-19.在基层医疗机构或医院门诊环境中,如果患者出现以下症状和体征,可判断其是否患有 COVID-19。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 May 20;5(5):CD013665. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013665.pub3.

本文引用的文献

1
Bottlenecks for Evidence Adoption.证据采用的瓶颈
J Polit Econ. 2024 Aug;132(8):2748-2789. doi: 10.1086/729447.
2
A manifesto for applying behavioural science.应用行为科学宣言。
Nat Hum Behav. 2023 Mar;7(3):310-322. doi: 10.1038/s41562-023-01555-3. Epub 2023 Mar 20.
3
The Research Program: Data quality, utility, and diversity.研究计划:数据质量、效用和多样性。
Patterns (N Y). 2022 Aug 12;3(8):100570. doi: 10.1016/j.patter.2022.100570.
4
Comparison of Racial, Ethnic, and Geographic Location Diversity of Participants Enrolled in Clinic-Based vs 2 Remote COVID-19 Clinical Trials.比较诊所招募的参与者和 2 项远程 COVID-19 临床试验参与者在种族、民族和地理位置多样性方面的差异。
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Feb 1;5(2):e2148325. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.48325.
5
Megastudies improve the impact of applied behavioural science.巨量研究提高应用行为科学的影响力。
Nature. 2021 Dec;600(7889):478-483. doi: 10.1038/s41586-021-04128-4. Epub 2021 Dec 8.
6
Diversity and inclusion for the All of Us research program: A scoping review.《全民研究计划的多样性和包容性:范围综述》。
PLoS One. 2020 Jul 1;15(7):e0234962. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0234962. eCollection 2020.
7
Digital clinical trials: creating a vision for the future.数字化临床试验:展望未来
NPJ Digit Med. 2019 Dec 12;2:126. doi: 10.1038/s41746-019-0203-0. eCollection 2019.
8
Disparity of Race Reporting and Representation in Clinical Trials Leading to Cancer Drug Approvals From 2008 to 2018.2008年至2018年导致癌症药物获批的临床试验中种族报告与代表性的差异
JAMA Oncol. 2019 Oct 1;5(10):e191870. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2019.1870. Epub 2019 Oct 10.
9
The "All of Us" Research Program.“All of Us”研究计划。
N Engl J Med. 2019 Aug 15;381(7):668-676. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsr1809937.
10
Exploring the use of a gamified intervention for encouraging physical activity in adolescents: a qualitative longitudinal study in Northern Ireland.探索使用游戏化干预措施来鼓励青少年进行体育活动:北爱尔兰的一项定性纵向研究。
BMJ Open. 2018 Apr 20;8(4):e019663. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019663.