• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

开发一种在模拟儿科复苏过程中评估对患者及其家属情感支持的工具:一项改良的德尔菲研究。

Development of a Tool to Evaluate Emotional Support for Patients and Families During Simulated Pediatric Resuscitations: A Modified Delphi Study.

作者信息

Duncan Ellen L, Agnant Joanne M, Sagalowsky Selin T

机构信息

From the Departments of Emergency Medicine and Pediatrics (E.L.D.), New York University Langone Health, New York, NY; Departments of Emergency Medicine and Pediatrics (J.M.A.), New York University Langone Health, New York, NY; New York Simulation Center for Health Sciences (J.M.A.), New York, NY; and Departments of Emergency Medicine and Pediatrics (S.T.S.), New York University Langone Health.

出版信息

Simul Healthc. 2025 Jun 24. doi: 10.1097/SIH.0000000000000866.

DOI:10.1097/SIH.0000000000000866
PMID:40548922
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Families overwhelmingly want to be present during pediatric resuscitations, and their presence offers myriad benefits. However, there is little evidence on how to teach and assess key patient- and family-centered communication behaviors. Our objective was to apply a modified Delphi methodology to develop and refine a simulation-based assessment tool focusing on crucial behaviors for healthcare providers providing emotional support to patients and families during pediatric medical resuscitations.

METHODS

We identified 4 behavioral domains and 14 subdomains through a literature review, focus groups with our institution's Family and Youth Advisory Councils, and adaptation of existing simulation-based communication assessment tools. A panel of 9 national experts conducted rounds of iterative revision and rating of candidate behaviors for inclusion, and we calculated mean approval ratings (1 = Do not include; 2 = Include with modifications; 3 = Include as is) for each subdomain.

RESULTS

Experts engaged in 5 iterative rounds of revision. None of the candidate behaviors were eliminated, and 1 ("Option to step out") was added to the "Respect and Value" domain. There was near-perfect consensus on the language of the final tool, with mean approval scores of 3.0 for all but 1 subdomain ("Introductions"), which had a mean score of 2.83 for minor grammatical edits; these were incorporated in the final assessment tool.

CONCLUSIONS

We created a novel simulation assessment tool based on a literature review, key stakeholder input, and a consensus of national experts through a modified Delphi method. Our final simulation assessment tool is behaviorally anchored, can be completed by a simulated participant or observer, and may serve to educate healthcare teams engaged in pediatric resuscitations regarding patient- and family-centered communication.

摘要

背景

绝大多数家庭都希望在儿科复苏过程中在场,而他们的在场有诸多益处。然而,关于如何教授和评估以患者及家庭为中心的关键沟通行为,几乎没有相关证据。我们的目标是应用改良的德尔菲法来开发和完善一种基于模拟的评估工具,该工具聚焦于医疗服务提供者在儿科医疗复苏期间为患者和家庭提供情感支持的关键行为。

方法

我们通过文献综述、与本机构家庭及青年咨询委员会的焦点小组讨论以及对现有的基于模拟的沟通评估工具进行改编,确定了4个行为领域和14个子领域。由9名全国专家组成的小组对候选行为进行了多轮迭代修订和纳入评级,我们计算了每个子领域的平均批准评级(1 = 不纳入;2 = 修改后纳入;3 = 原样纳入)。

结果

专家们进行了5轮迭代修订。没有候选行为被淘汰,并且在“尊重与重视”领域增加了1个行为(“选择退出”)。最终工具的语言达成了近乎完美的共识,除1个子领域(“介绍”)外,所有子领域的平均批准得分均为3.0,“介绍”子领域因小的语法编辑平均得分为2.83;这些都纳入了最终评估工具。

结论

我们通过改良的德尔菲法,基于文献综述、关键利益相关者的意见以及全国专家的共识,创建了一种新颖的模拟评估工具。我们最终的模拟评估工具以行为为锚定,可以由模拟参与者或观察者完成,并且可能有助于对参与儿科复苏的医疗团队进行以患者及家庭为中心的沟通教育。

相似文献

1
Development of a Tool to Evaluate Emotional Support for Patients and Families During Simulated Pediatric Resuscitations: A Modified Delphi Study.开发一种在模拟儿科复苏过程中评估对患者及其家属情感支持的工具:一项改良的德尔菲研究。
Simul Healthc. 2025 Jun 24. doi: 10.1097/SIH.0000000000000866.
2
Family-centred interventions for Indigenous early childhood well-being by primary healthcare services.以初级医疗保健服务为中心的家庭干预措施,促进土著儿童早期的身心健康。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Dec 13;12(12):CD012463. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012463.pub2.
3
Home treatment for mental health problems: a systematic review.心理健康问题的居家治疗:一项系统综述
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(15):1-139. doi: 10.3310/hta5150.
4
Interventions for interpersonal communication about end of life care between health practitioners and affected people.干预健康从业者与受影响者之间关于临终关怀的人际沟通。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Jul 8;7(7):CD013116. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013116.pub2.
5
Exercise interventions and patient beliefs for people with hip, knee or hip and knee osteoarthritis: a mixed methods review.髋、膝或髋膝骨关节炎患者的运动干预和患者信念:一项混合方法综述
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Apr 17;4(4):CD010842. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010842.pub2.
6
Survivor, family and professional experiences of psychosocial interventions for sexual abuse and violence: a qualitative evidence synthesis.性虐待和暴力的心理社会干预的幸存者、家庭和专业人员的经验:定性证据综合。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Oct 4;10(10):CD013648. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013648.pub2.
7
Measures implemented in the school setting to contain the COVID-19 pandemic.学校为控制 COVID-19 疫情而采取的措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Jan 17;1(1):CD015029. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015029.
8
Negative pressure wound therapy for surgical wounds healing by primary closure.负压伤口疗法在一期缝合手术伤口愈合中的应用。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Apr 26;4(4):CD009261. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009261.pub7.
9
How to Implement Digital Clinical Consultations in UK Maternity Care: the ARM@DA Realist Review.如何在英国产科护理中实施数字临床会诊:ARM@DA实证主义综述
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 May 21:1-77. doi: 10.3310/WQFV7425.
10
Stakeholders' perceptions and experiences of factors influencing the commissioning, delivery, and uptake of general health checks: a qualitative evidence synthesis.利益相关者对影响一般健康检查的委托、提供和接受因素的看法与体验:一项定性证据综合分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Mar 20;3(3):CD014796. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014796.pub2.