• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于农村地区的头颈部鳞状细胞癌(HNSCC)患者预后评估:一项回顾性队列研究

Evaluation of Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma (HNSCC) Patient Outcomes Based on Rurality: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

作者信息

Lane Sarah, Smith Bailey, Brodersen Carly, Hanson Schae, Spanos William, Powell Steven

机构信息

University of South Dakota Sanford School of Medicine.

出版信息

S D Med. 2025 May;78(suppl 5):s31.

PMID:40550170
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) receiving chemoradiotherapy require ongoing treatment and follow-up, which may be influenced by distance to care. Rural patients often face limited access to specialized treatment centers, yet data on rurality's impact on compliance and outcomes remain limited. This study evaluates differences in treatment adherence and outcomes between rural and urban HNSCC patients.

METHODS

Retrospective chart review identified patients with HNSCC treated with chemoradiotherapy from 2010-2019 at Sanford Health in Sioux Falls, South Dakota; Fargo, North Dakota; and Bismark, North Dakota. Patients were classified as either rural (R) or urban (U) based on their home address using the Federal Office of Rural Health Policy (FORHP) definition. Differences in patient and disease characteristics were analyzed. Post-treatment complications (ototoxicity, osteoradionecrosis, and treatment compliance (major delays in radiation treatment [greater than 5 days] and prolonged time to complete radiation [greater than 52 days]) were compared between groups using chi-squared and t-tests.

RESULTS

132 patients met eligibility. Participants were predominantly male (80% U, 83.1% R), Medicare/ Medicaid (66.2% R, 60% U), Oropharynx (57.1% R, 61.8% U), and stage IV (84.4% R, 85.5% U). There was no significant difference in number of missed appointments (p=0.16), treatment breaks (p=0.15), prolonged time to complete radiation (p=0.67). Post-treatment complication rates were also similar: ototoxicity (R: 51.9%, U: 58.2%, p=0.49), osteoradionecrosis (R: 16.9%, U: 7.3%, p=0.1), and soft tissue necrosis (R: 35.1%, U: 27.3%, p=0.34).

CONCLUSION

Rural and urban HNSCC patients showed no significant differences in treatment adherence or outcomes. These findings suggest that rural patients may have access to sufficient resources and support, enabling them to receive cancer treatment comparable to their urban counterparts. However, this study may be limited by its relatively small sample size, and further research is warranted to explore this topic in larger and more diverse populations.

摘要

引言

接受放化疗的头颈部鳞状细胞癌(HNSCC)患者需要持续的治疗和随访,而这可能会受到就医距离的影响。农村患者往往难以获得专门的治疗中心,然而关于农村地区对依从性和治疗结果影响的数据仍然有限。本研究评估农村和城市HNSCC患者在治疗依从性和治疗结果方面的差异。

方法

通过回顾性病历审查,确定了2010年至2019年在南达科他州苏福尔斯、北达科他州法戈和北达科他州俾斯麦的桑福德健康中心接受放化疗的HNSCC患者。根据患者的家庭住址,使用联邦农村卫生政策办公室(FORHP)的定义将患者分为农村(R)或城市(U)。分析患者和疾病特征的差异。使用卡方检验和t检验比较两组之间的治疗后并发症(耳毒性、放射性骨坏死)和治疗依从性(放疗主要延迟[大于5天]和完成放疗时间延长[大于52天])。

结果

132名患者符合入选标准。参与者主要为男性(城市组80%,农村组83.1%),医疗保险/医疗补助参保者(农村组66.2%,城市组60%),口咽癌患者(农村组57.1%,城市组61.8%),IV期患者(农村组84.4%,城市组85.5%)。错过预约的次数(p = 0.16)、治疗中断(p = 0.15)、完成放疗时间延长(p = 0.67)方面无显著差异。治疗后并发症发生率也相似:耳毒性(农村组:51.9%,城市组:58.2%,p = 0.49),放射性骨坏死(农村组:16.9%,城市组:7.3%,p = 0.1),软组织坏死(农村组:35.1%,城市组:27.3%,p = 0.34)。

结论

农村和城市HNSCC患者在治疗依从性或治疗结果方面无显著差异。这些发现表明农村患者可能有足够的资源和支持,使他们能够接受与城市患者相当的癌症治疗。然而,本研究可能受样本量相对较小的限制,有必要进行进一步研究以在更大和更多样化的人群中探讨这一主题。

相似文献

1
Evaluation of Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma (HNSCC) Patient Outcomes Based on Rurality: A Retrospective Cohort Study.基于农村地区的头颈部鳞状细胞癌(HNSCC)患者预后评估:一项回顾性队列研究
S D Med. 2025 May;78(suppl 5):s31.
2
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.系统性药理学治疗慢性斑块状银屑病:网络荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Apr 19;4(4):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub4.
3
Home treatment for mental health problems: a systematic review.心理健康问题的居家治疗:一项系统综述
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(15):1-139. doi: 10.3310/hta5150.
4
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.慢性斑块状银屑病的全身药理学治疗:一项网状荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Dec 22;12(12):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub2.
5
A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of topotecan for ovarian cancer.拓扑替康治疗卵巢癌的临床有效性和成本效益的快速系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(28):1-110. doi: 10.3310/hta5280.
6
Cost-effectiveness of using prognostic information to select women with breast cancer for adjuvant systemic therapy.利用预后信息为乳腺癌患者选择辅助性全身治疗的成本效益
Health Technol Assess. 2006 Sep;10(34):iii-iv, ix-xi, 1-204. doi: 10.3310/hta10340.
7
Intravenous magnesium sulphate and sotalol for prevention of atrial fibrillation after coronary artery bypass surgery: a systematic review and economic evaluation.静脉注射硫酸镁和索他洛尔预防冠状动脉搭桥术后房颤:系统评价与经济学评估
Health Technol Assess. 2008 Jun;12(28):iii-iv, ix-95. doi: 10.3310/hta12280.
8
Adefovir dipivoxil and pegylated interferon alfa-2a for the treatment of chronic hepatitis B: a systematic review and economic evaluation.阿德福韦酯与聚乙二醇化干扰素α-2a治疗慢性乙型肝炎:系统评价与经济学评估
Health Technol Assess. 2006 Aug;10(28):iii-iv, xi-xiv, 1-183. doi: 10.3310/hta10280.
9
Signs and symptoms to determine if a patient presenting in primary care or hospital outpatient settings has COVID-19.在基层医疗机构或医院门诊环境中,如果患者出现以下症状和体征,可判断其是否患有 COVID-19。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 May 20;5(5):CD013665. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013665.pub3.
10
Systemic treatments for metastatic cutaneous melanoma.转移性皮肤黑色素瘤的全身治疗
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Feb 6;2(2):CD011123. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011123.pub2.