Hu Songhao, Zhu Li, Zhang Xiangyang
Fourth People's Hospital in Hefei, Affiliated Psychological Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China.
School of Mental Health and Psychological Sciences, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China.
Psychol Med. 2025 Jun 24;55:e174. doi: 10.1017/S0033291725100664.
Major depressive disorder (MDD) is a complex and heterogeneous disorder, and this heterogeneity poses a significant challenge for advancing precision medicine in patients with MDD. MRI-based subtyping analysis has been widely employed to address the heterogeneity of MDD patients. In this study, we investigated the subtypes of first-episode and drug-naive (FEDN) MDD patients based on the individualized structural covariance network (IDSCN).
In this study, we used T1-weighted anatomical images of 164 FEDN MDD patients and 164 healthy controls from the REST-meta-MDD consortium. The IDSCN of participants was obtained using the network template perturbation method. Subtypes of FEDN MDD were identified using k-means clustering analysis, and differences in neuroimaging findings and clinical symptoms between the identified subtypes were compared using two-sample -tests.
This study identified two subtypes of FEDN MDD: subtype 1 ( = 117) and subtype 2 ( = 47) by characterizing 10 edges that were significantly altered in at least 5% of patients (i.e., 8 patients) in the IDSCN. Compared with subtype 2, subtype 1 had significantly higher anxiety symptom scores, stronger structural covariance edges in 9 edges within the thalamus, and a significantly reduced gray matter volume (GMV) in the frontal and parietal regions, and in the thalamus.
Our results suggest that patients with FEDN MDD can be classified into two different subtypes based on their IDSCN, providing an important reference for personalized treatment and precision medicine for patients with FEDN MDD.
重度抑郁症(MDD)是一种复杂的异质性疾病,这种异质性对推进MDD患者的精准医学构成了重大挑战。基于磁共振成像(MRI)的亚型分析已被广泛用于解决MDD患者的异质性问题。在本研究中,我们基于个体化结构协方差网络(IDSCN)对首发未用药(FEDN)的MDD患者进行了亚型研究。
在本研究中,我们使用了来自REST-meta-MDD联盟的164例FEDN的MDD患者和164名健康对照的T1加权解剖图像。采用网络模板扰动法获得参与者的IDSCN。使用k均值聚类分析确定FEDN的MDD亚型,并使用两样本检验比较所确定亚型之间神经影像学结果和临床症状的差异。
本研究通过对IDSCN中至少5%的患者(即8例患者)有显著改变的10条边进行特征分析,确定了FEDN的MDD的两个亚型:亚型1(n = 117)和亚型2(n = 47)。与亚型2相比,亚型1的焦虑症状评分显著更高,丘脑内9条边的结构协方差更强,额叶、顶叶和丘脑的灰质体积(GMV)显著减小。
我们的结果表明,FEDN的MDD患者可根据其IDSCN分为两种不同的亚型,为FEDN的MDD患者的个性化治疗和精准医学提供了重要参考。