• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一个值得注意的问题:寻常痤疮患者皮肤微生态研究中,微生物组数据因采样方法而异。

A noteworthy issue: microbiome data variation depending on sampling methods in skin microecology studies in acne vulgaris patients.

作者信息

Xu De-Tian, Chen Qi, Yang Jia-Yi, Yan Guo-Rong, Zhang Ling-Lin, Liu Xiao-Jing, Wang Pei-Ru, Liu Jia, Wang Xiu-Li

机构信息

Shanghai Skin Disease Hospital, Tongji University Medical School, Shanghai, China.

The Ice Dermalab, Shanghai, China.

出版信息

Front Immunol. 2025 Jun 9;16:1566786. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2025.1566786. eCollection 2025.

DOI:10.3389/fimmu.2025.1566786
PMID:40552289
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12183089/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Skin microecology significantly affects health, with the microbiome being a complex community of microorganisms. Different niche preferences of microorganisms raise concerns about the adequacy of common sampling methods like swabbing and cyanoacrylate biopsy. In this study, we aim to contribute to a more suitable sampling strategy in acne microbiome studies.

METHODS

This study involved ten mild to moderate acne patients. Three sampling methods were used: swab sampling (S1), modified standardized skin surface biopsy (S2), and individual comedo extraction (S3). DNA was extracted and sequenced to analyze the microbiome data.

RESULTS

There were significant differences in the bacterial and fungal microbiome data obtained by the three different sampling methods. spp. (significantly higher in S3, <0.05) and spp. (higher in S3, <0.05) were most affected by sampling methods. Bacterial phyla Proteobacteria (abundant in S1) and Bacteroidota (dominant in S2) also showed method-dependent variations.

CONCLUSION

The choice of sampling method significantly impacts microbiome data, highlighting the need for accurate sampling to understand the relationship between the skin microbiome and acne. Standardizing sampling methods in future studies is essential for advancing skin microecology research.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

http://www.chictr.org.cn, identifier ChiCTR-CPC-17012398.

摘要

引言

皮肤微生物群对健康有重大影响,微生物组是一个复杂的微生物群落。微生物不同的生态位偏好引发了对诸如拭子采样和氰基丙烯酸酯活检等常用采样方法是否充分的担忧。在本研究中,我们旨在为痤疮微生物组研究提供一种更合适的采样策略。

方法

本研究纳入了10名轻至中度痤疮患者。使用了三种采样方法:拭子采样(S1)、改良标准化皮肤表面活检(S2)和单个粉刺提取(S3)。提取DNA并进行测序以分析微生物组数据。

结果

三种不同采样方法获得的细菌和真菌微生物组数据存在显著差异。 spp.(在S3中显著更高,<0.05)和 spp.(在S3中更高,<0.05)受采样方法影响最大。细菌门变形菌门(在S1中丰富)和拟杆菌门(在S2中占主导)也表现出方法依赖性变化。

结论

采样方法的选择对微生物组数据有显著影响,这凸显了准确采样对于理解皮肤微生物组与痤疮之间关系的必要性。在未来研究中标准化采样方法对于推进皮肤微生物生态学研究至关重要。

临床试验注册

http://www.chictr.org.cn,标识符ChiCTR-CPC-17012398。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b7ed/12183089/7726c2075fc8/fimmu-16-1566786-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b7ed/12183089/282c7ed22914/fimmu-16-1566786-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b7ed/12183089/4206e3481d32/fimmu-16-1566786-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b7ed/12183089/58ebdd745818/fimmu-16-1566786-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b7ed/12183089/7726c2075fc8/fimmu-16-1566786-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b7ed/12183089/282c7ed22914/fimmu-16-1566786-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b7ed/12183089/4206e3481d32/fimmu-16-1566786-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b7ed/12183089/58ebdd745818/fimmu-16-1566786-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b7ed/12183089/7726c2075fc8/fimmu-16-1566786-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
A noteworthy issue: microbiome data variation depending on sampling methods in skin microecology studies in acne vulgaris patients.一个值得注意的问题:寻常痤疮患者皮肤微生态研究中,微生物组数据因采样方法而异。
Front Immunol. 2025 Jun 9;16:1566786. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2025.1566786. eCollection 2025.
2
Interventions for acne scars.痤疮瘢痕的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Apr 3;4(4):CD011946. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011946.pub2.
3
Minocycline for acne vulgaris: efficacy and safety.米诺环素治疗寻常痤疮:疗效与安全性。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2003(1):CD002086. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002086.
4
Minocycline for acne vulgaris: efficacy and safety.米诺环素治疗寻常痤疮:疗效与安全性。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2000(2):CD002086. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002086.
5
Minocycline for acne vulgaris: efficacy and safety.米诺环素治疗寻常痤疮:疗效与安全性。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Aug 15;2012(8):CD002086. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002086.pub2.
6
Evaluating the Effectiveness of Probiotic Supplementation in Combination With Doxycycline for the Treatment of Moderate Acne: A Randomized Double-Blind Controlled Clinical Trial.评估益生菌补充剂联合多西环素治疗中度痤疮的有效性:一项随机双盲对照临床试验。
J Cosmet Dermatol. 2025 Jan;24(1):e16614. doi: 10.1111/jocd.16614. Epub 2024 Oct 16.
7
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.系统性药理学治疗慢性斑块状银屑病:网络荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Apr 19;4(4):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub4.
8
Falls prevention interventions for community-dwelling older adults: systematic review and meta-analysis of benefits, harms, and patient values and preferences.社区居住的老年人跌倒预防干预措施:系统评价和荟萃分析的益处、危害以及患者的价值观和偏好。
Syst Rev. 2024 Nov 26;13(1):289. doi: 10.1186/s13643-024-02681-3.
9
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.慢性斑块状银屑病的全身药理学治疗:一项网状荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Dec 22;12(12):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub2.
10
Drugs for discoid lupus erythematosus.用于盘状红斑狼疮的药物。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 May 5;5(5):CD002954. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002954.pub3.

本文引用的文献

1
A 1-min double embedding method for small tissue specimens preserves comedone histology and eliminates the need for punch biopsies.一种 1 分钟双包埋法可用于保存微小组织标本的粉刺组织学,且无需进行打孔活检。
Skin Res Technol. 2023 Jan;29(1):e13235. doi: 10.1111/srt.13235. Epub 2022 Dec 8.
2
Challenges in exploring and manipulating the human skin microbiome.探索和操纵人类皮肤微生物组的挑战。
Microbiome. 2021 May 30;9(1):125. doi: 10.1186/s40168-021-01062-5.
3
Exploring the human hair follicle microbiome.探索人类毛囊微生物组。
Br J Dermatol. 2021 May;184(5):802-815. doi: 10.1111/bjd.19461. Epub 2021 Feb 18.
4
Homeostasis of the sebaceous gland and mechanisms of acne pathogenesis.皮脂腺的稳态和痤疮发病机制的相关机制。
Br J Dermatol. 2019 Oct;181(4):677-690. doi: 10.1111/bjd.17981. Epub 2019 May 6.
5
Microbiome in the hair follicle of androgenetic alopecia patients.雄激素性脱发患者毛囊中的微生物组。
PLoS One. 2019 May 3;14(5):e0216330. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0216330. eCollection 2019.
6
A Comparison of Techniques for Collecting Skin Microbiome Samples: Swabbing Versus Tape-Stripping.皮肤微生物组样本采集技术的比较:擦拭法与胶带剥离法。
Front Microbiol. 2018 Oct 2;9:2362. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.02362. eCollection 2018.
7
Is Human Sebum the Source of Skin Follicular Ultraviolet-Induced Red Fluorescence? A Cellular to Histological Study.人体皮脂是皮肤毛囊紫外线诱导红色荧光的来源吗?一项从细胞到组织学的研究。
Dermatology. 2018;234(1-2):43-50. doi: 10.1159/000489396. Epub 2018 Jul 3.
8
The Follicular Skin Microbiome in Patients With Hidradenitis Suppurativa and Healthy Controls.化脓性汗腺炎患者与健康对照者的毛囊皮肤微生物群
JAMA Dermatol. 2017 Sep 1;153(9):897-905. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2017.0904.
9
Microbial Ecology of the Human Skin.人体皮肤微生物生态学。
Microb Ecol. 2018 Jul;76(1):113-120. doi: 10.1007/s00248-016-0789-6. Epub 2016 May 31.
10
Absence or low density of Propionibacterium acnes in comedonal lesions of acne patients? A surface to inside study of skin fluorescence.痤疮患者粉刺性皮损中痤疮丙酸杆菌缺失或低密度?皮肤荧光的从表面到内部的研究
Exp Dermatol. 2016 Sep;25(9):721-2. doi: 10.1111/exd.13045.