Ferrari Dafne, Bonavolontà Valerio, Campanella Matteo, Cardinali Ludovica, Falcioni Lavinia, Emerenziani Gian Pietro, Migliaccio Silvia, Mocini Edoardo, Meucci Marco, Baldari Carlo, De Giorgio Andrea, Guidetti Laura
Department of Life Science, Health, and Health Professions, Link Campus University, Rome, Italy.
Department of Biotechnological and Applied Clinical Sciences, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy.
J Obes Metab Syndr. 2025 Jul 30;34(3):282-290. doi: 10.7570/jomes24049. Epub 2025 Jun 25.
To assess cardiorespiratory efficiency in obese adults, two exercise test treadmill protocols with 2- or 3-minute stages were compared.
Thirty-six obese adult subjects were involved in this study. Sixteen men (age 51.5±10.5 years; body mass index [BMI] 36.7±4.8 kg/m) and 20 women (age 42.4±12.4 years; BMI 36.5±4.7 kg/m) performed submaximal incremental graded tests on treadmills with 2- or 3-minute stages on different days. During each testing session, heart rate (HR), oxygen uptake (VO mL/min/kg), rate of perceived exertion (RPE), fat oxidation (FO) at maximal fat oxidation (MFO), and maximal fat oxidation zone (Fatmax zone) were measured.
No differences were found for HR, VO, and RPE at MFO between the two protocols. Significant differences (2-minute vs. 3-minute) were found for FO (576.3±162.9 mg/min vs. 506.0±148.1 mg/min respectively; <0.05) at MFO between the two protocols. No differences were found for VO and HR in high and low Fat zone borders. Moreover, a difference was found for FO at the low and high borders.
Exercise intensity at which the MFO and Fat zone occur is not influenced by the duration of stage-to-stage increments. The two exercise testing protocols could be considered interchangeable to assess HR, VO, and RPE at MFO.
为评估肥胖成年人的心肺效率,比较了两种具有2分钟或3分钟阶段的运动测试跑步机方案。
36名肥胖成年受试者参与了本研究。16名男性(年龄51.5±10.5岁;体重指数[BMI]36.7±4.8kg/m²)和20名女性(年龄42.4±12.4岁;BMI 36.5±4.7kg/m²)在不同日期在跑步机上进行了具有2分钟或3分钟阶段的次极量递增分级测试。在每次测试期间,测量心率(HR)、摄氧量(VO₂,mL/min/kg)、主观用力程度(RPE)、最大脂肪氧化(MFO)时的脂肪氧化(FO)以及最大脂肪氧化区(Fatmax区)。
两种方案在MFO时的HR、VO₂和RPE方面未发现差异。两种方案在MFO时的FO(分别为576.3±162.9mg/min和506.0±148.1mg/min;P<0.05)存在显著差异(2分钟与3分钟)。在高、低Fat区边界的VO₂和HR方面未发现差异。此外,在低、高边界的FO方面存在差异。
MFO和Fat区出现时的运动强度不受阶段间递增持续时间的影响。两种运动测试方案在评估MFO时的HR、VO₂和RPE方面可被视为 interchangeable。 (注:这里“interchangeable”直接保留英文,因为中文里可能没有完全对应的精准词汇,结合语境大致可理解为“可相互替换使用”之类意思 )