Kothmann M M, Pittroff W
Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, USA.
Inter|Pares International Development Consultants, Idar-Oberstein, Germany.
Animal. 2025 May 26:101554. doi: 10.1016/j.animal.2025.101554.
Since the publication of the UN-FAO report on the environmental impact of livestock production in 2006, negative headlines seem to rule the public perception of ruminant livestock production. Two themes dominate this discussion: the emission of greenhouse gases, and the worldwide degradation of grazing resources. We show that currently used methods for source strength estimation in global methane budget models cannot produce independent estimates and therefore do not qualify as support of policy decisions. We further submit that there is no justification for the view that methane output by ruminants is a key priority area of research in ruminant nutrition. We review the history of methodology and application of vegetation monitoring on rangelands and its interaction with grazing management. We discuss some of the reasons why rangeland conservation management has become globally so divergent in its application scope and success, with widespread resource degradation observed worldwide. This is a critically relevant topic affecting a natural space occupying more than half of the global landmass, and constituting the most important feed resource for global livestock production. Achieving sustainable management of rangelands has been a challenge around the world throughout recorded history. The integrated management of grazing and prescribed fire as the keystone practices should be based on sound ecological principles and be supported by management-oriented decision-support tools. This has not been accomplished yet. In the past couple of centuries, historic grazing and fire regimes have been significantly disrupted worldwide, often in conjunction with excessive grazing, causing widespread rangeland degradation. These problems are linked to increasing human and livestock populations and changing cultures. Increasing human populations are also the key factor in the ever-expanding conversion of historic rangelands into rainfed crop production areas. These occur on semi-arid lands not allowing long-term sustainable use for crop production and consequently, they lead to extremely detrimental consequences for the environment and for the climate. With this paper, we introduce key concepts in rangeland monitoring to animal scientists in order to facilitate a deeper understanding of the current problems in conservation management of one of the most important resources for livestock production. We explore the problem of rangeland degradation related to livestock grazing and the role of rangeland management in providing solutions. We discuss how rangeland and animal management must be integrated to ensure long-term use of this resource, without which global livestock production would not be feasible.
自联合国粮农组织2006年发布关于畜牧生产环境影响的报告以来,负面新闻似乎主导了公众对反刍家畜生产的认知。这一讨论主要围绕两个主题展开:温室气体排放以及全球范围内放牧资源的退化。我们表明,全球甲烷预算模型中目前用于估算源强的方法无法得出独立的估算结果,因此不能作为政策决策的依据。我们还认为,反刍动物的甲烷排放是反刍动物营养研究的关键优先领域这一观点没有依据。我们回顾了牧场植被监测方法的历史及其应用,以及它与放牧管理的相互作用。我们讨论了牧场保护管理在全球范围内应用范围和成效差异巨大,且全球范围内普遍存在资源退化现象的一些原因。这是一个至关重要的相关话题,涉及占据全球陆地面积一半以上的自然空间,且是全球畜牧生产最重要的饲料资源。有史以来,实现牧场的可持续管理一直是世界各地面临的一项挑战。作为关键做法的放牧与规定火烧的综合管理应以合理的生态原则为基础,并得到以管理为导向的决策支持工具的支持。但目前尚未实现这一点。在过去几个世纪里,全球范围内历史悠久的放牧和火烧模式受到了严重干扰,往往伴随着过度放牧,导致牧场大面积退化。这些问题与人类和牲畜数量的增加以及文化变迁有关。人口增长也是历史悠久的牧场不断扩大转变为雨养作物种植区的关键因素。这种转变发生在不适合长期可持续作物生产的半干旱土地上,因此,会给环境和气候带来极其不利的后果。通过本文,我们向动物科学家介绍牧场监测的关键概念,以便他们更深入地了解畜牧生产最重要资源之一的保护管理中当前存在的问题。我们探讨了与牲畜放牧相关的牧场退化问题以及牧场管理在提供解决方案方面的作用。我们讨论了牧场管理与动物管理必须如何整合,以确保对这一资源的长期利用,没有这一点,全球畜牧生产将无法实现。