Gallagher C G, Hof V I, Younes M
J Appl Physiol (1985). 1985 Oct;59(4):1152-8. doi: 10.1152/jappl.1985.59.4.1152.
Our aim was to determine whether inspiratory muscle fatigue changes breathing pattern and whether any changes seen occur before mechanical fatigue develops. Nine normal subjects breathed through a variable inspiratory resistance with a predetermined mouth pressure (Pm) during inspiration and a fixed ratio of inspiratory time to total breath duration. Breathing pattern after resistive breathing (recovery breathing pattern) was compared with breathing pattern at rest and during CO2 rebreathing (control breathing pattern) for each subject. Relative rapid shallow breathing was seen after mechanical fatigue and also in experiments with electromyogram evidence of diaphragmatic fatigue where Pm was maintained at the predetermined level during the period of resistive breathing. In contrast there was no significant difference between recovery and control breathing patterns when neither mechanical nor electromyogram fatigue was seen. It is suggested that breathing pattern after inspiratory muscle fatigue changes in order to minimize respiratory sensation.
我们的目的是确定吸气肌疲劳是否会改变呼吸模式,以及在出现机械性疲劳之前是否会有任何可见的变化。九名正常受试者在吸气过程中通过可变吸气阻力进行呼吸,吸气时口腔压力(Pm)预先设定,吸气时间与总呼吸持续时间的比例固定。将每个受试者在阻力呼吸后的呼吸模式(恢复呼吸模式)与静息时以及二氧化碳重复呼吸期间的呼吸模式(对照呼吸模式)进行比较。在出现机械性疲劳后以及在有膈肌疲劳肌电图证据的实验中(在阻力呼吸期间Pm维持在预定水平),都出现了相对快速的浅呼吸。相比之下,当既未出现机械性疲劳也未出现肌电图疲劳时,恢复呼吸模式与对照呼吸模式之间没有显著差异。有人认为,吸气肌疲劳后的呼吸模式会发生改变,以便将呼吸感觉降至最低。