Suppr超能文献

WILL随机试验(何时引产以降低妊娠高血压风险)中女性的分娩经历:一项混合方法分析

Women's Childbirth Experiences in the WILL Randomised Trial (When to Induce Labour to Limit Risk in Pregnancy Hypertension): A Mixed Methods Analysis.

作者信息

Tohill Sue, Kirkham Katie, Gkini Eleni, Moakes Catherine A, Silverio Sergio A, Horgan Gillian, Wills Ben, Hutcheon Jennifer A, Singer Joel, Stubbs Clive, Thornton Jim G, von Dadelszen Peter, Magee Laura A

机构信息

Maternity Services, Guy's and St Thomas' National Health Service (NHS) Foundation Trust, London, UK.

Birmingham Clinical Trials Unit, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.

出版信息

BJOG. 2025 Sep;132(10):1426-1437. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.18257. Epub 2025 Jun 24.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare childbirth satisfaction in women with chronic or gestational hypertension, randomised to 'planned early term birth at 38 weeks' gestation' (intervention) or 'usual care at term' (control).

DESIGN

Randomised trial.

SETTING

Forty-two consultant-led maternity units, United Kingdom.

POPULATION

357/403 women randomised completed the Childbirth Experience Questionnaire (CEQ).

METHODS

Mixed-methods analysis of the 22-item CEQ, assessing: 'Own capacity', 'Professional support', 'Perceived safety' and 'Participation'. Directed content analysis sorted free-text comments into themes covered by the CEQ and two additional themes.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

CEQ scores overall and by domain.

RESULTS

In intervention (vs. control) groups, the CEQ was completed by 177/202, 88.1% (vs. 180/202, 89.1%) participants, and 378 free-text comments were made by 93/177, 52.5% (vs. 98/180, 54.4%) participants. There was no significant difference in CEQ scores overall (3.1 ± 0.4 vs. 3.1 ± 0.4, respectively) or by domain ('Own capacity' [2.8 ± 0.5 vs. 2.7 ± 0.5, respectively]; 'Professional support' [3.7 ± 0.5 vs. 3.7 ± 0.6, respectively]; 'Perceived safety' [3.2 ± 0.6 vs. 3.1 ± 0.6, respectively]; and 'Participation' [2.6 ± 0.7 vs. 2.7 ± 0.6]). Most comments were positive (222/378, 58.7%), and about 'Relational care and care interactions' (CEQ 'Professional support'). Neither the number nor positivity of comments appeared to differ between groups.

CONCLUSION

For women with chronic or gestational hypertension who remain well at term, we found no difference in childbirth experience between women randomised to planned early term birth versus usual care at term. Shared decisions about timing of birth may be more influenced by differences in clinical outcomes and costs.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ISRCTN: 77258279.

摘要

目的

比较慢性高血压或妊娠期高血压妇女的分娩满意度,这些妇女被随机分配至“妊娠38周计划早产”(干预组)或“足月常规护理”(对照组)。

设计

随机试验。

地点

英国42个由顾问主导的产科单位。

研究对象

403名随机分组的妇女中有357名完成了分娩体验问卷(CEQ)。

方法

对包含22个条目的CEQ进行混合方法分析,评估“自身能力”“专业支持”“感知安全性”和“参与度”。定向内容分析将自由文本评论分类为CEQ涵盖的主题以及另外两个主题。

主要结局指标

CEQ总分及各领域得分。

结果

在干预组(与对照组相比)中,177/202名(88.1%,对照组为180/202名,89.1%)参与者完成了CEQ,93/177名(52.5%,对照组为98/180名,54.4%)参与者给出了378条自由文本评论。CEQ总分(分别为3.1±0.4和3.1±0.4)及各领域得分(“自身能力”分别为2.8±0.5和2.7±0.5;“专业支持”分别为3.7±0.5和3.7±0.6;“感知安全性”分别为3.2±0.6和3.1±0.6;“参与度”分别为2.6±0.7和2.7±0.6)均无显著差异。大多数评论是积极的(222/378,58.7%),且涉及“关系性护理和护理互动”(CEQ“专业支持”)。两组之间评论的数量和积极性似乎均无差异。

结论

对于足月时状况良好的慢性高血压或妊娠期高血压妇女,我们发现随机分配至计划早产与足月常规护理的妇女在分娩体验上没有差异。关于分娩时间的共同决策可能更多地受到临床结局和成本差异的影响。

试验注册号

ISRCTN:77258279。

相似文献

2
Planned birth at or near term for improving health outcomes for pregnant women with gestational diabetes and their infants.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jan 5;1(1):CD012910. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012910.
3
Planned early delivery versus expectant management for hypertensive disorders from 34 weeks gestation to term.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Jan 15;1(1):CD009273. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009273.pub2.
4
Planned early delivery versus expectant management of the term suspected compromised baby for improving outcomes.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Nov 24;2015(11):CD009433. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009433.pub2.
5
Hypnosis for pain management during labour and childbirth.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 May 19;2016(5):CD009356. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009356.pub3.
6
Non-clinical interventions for reducing unnecessary caesarean section.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Sep 28;9(9):CD005528. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005528.pub3.
7
Assessment and support during early labour for improving birth outcomes.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Apr 20;4(4):CD011516. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011516.pub2.
8
Acupuncture or acupressure for induction of labour.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Oct 17;10(10):CD002962. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002962.pub4.
10
Debriefing interventions for the prevention of psychological trauma in women following childbirth.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Apr 10;2015(4):CD007194. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007194.pub2.

本文引用的文献

2
Measuring Women's Satisfaction with Childbirth: A Literature Review of Measurement Properties.
Zdr Varst. 2024 Mar 20;63(2):100-108. doi: 10.2478/sjph-2024-0014. eCollection 2024 Jun.
3
Experience of induction of labour: a cross-sectional postnatal survey of women at UK maternity units.
BMJ Open. 2023 May 9;13(5):e071703. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-071703.
4
WILL (When to induce labour to limit risk in pregnancy hypertension): Protocol for a multicentre randomised trial.
Pregnancy Hypertens. 2023 Jun;32:35-42. doi: 10.1016/j.preghy.2023.03.002. Epub 2023 Apr 3.
5
Labor induction information leaflets-Do women receive evidence-based information about the benefits and harms of labor induction?
Front Glob Womens Health. 2022 Nov 21;3:936770. doi: 10.3389/fgwh.2022.936770. eCollection 2022.
10
Childbirth experience questionnaire 2: Validating its use in the United Kingdom.
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol X. 2019 Oct 3;5:100097. doi: 10.1016/j.eurox.2019.100097. eCollection 2020 Jan.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验