• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Childbirth experience questionnaire 2: Validating its use in the United Kingdom.分娩体验问卷2:验证其在英国的使用情况。
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol X. 2019 Oct 3;5:100097. doi: 10.1016/j.eurox.2019.100097. eCollection 2020 Jan.
2
Childbirth experience questionnaire: validating its use in the United Kingdom.分娩体验问卷:验证其在英国的使用情况。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2015 Apr 7;15:86. doi: 10.1186/s12884-015-0513-4.
3
Childbirth experience questionnaire 2 - Icelandic translation and validation.产妇分娩经历问卷 2-冰岛语翻译与验证。
Sex Reprod Healthc. 2023 Sep;37:100882. doi: 10.1016/j.srhc.2023.100882. Epub 2023 Jun 28.
4
Overall childbirth experience: what does it mean? A comparison between an overall childbirth experience rating and the Childbirth Experience Questionnaire 2.总体分娩体验:它意味着什么?总体分娩体验评分与产时经历量表 2 的比较。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2023 Mar 14;23(1):176. doi: 10.1186/s12884-023-05498-5.
5
Validating the use of the revised childbirth experience questionnaire in Hong Kong.验证香港使用修订版分娩经历问卷的有效性。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2022 Feb 15;22(1):126. doi: 10.1186/s12884-022-04456-x.
6
Dosage of oxytocin for augmentation of labor and women's childbirth experiences: A randomized controlled trial.缩宫素在引产和妇女分娩体验中的剂量:一项随机对照试验。
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2021 May;100(5):971-978. doi: 10.1111/aogs.14042. Epub 2021 Jan 28.
7
Adaption and validation of the childbirth experience questionnaire (CEQ-SK) in Slovakia.分娩体验问卷(CEQ-SK)在斯洛伐克的改编与验证。
Eur J Midwifery. 2023 Mar 14;7:6. doi: 10.18332/ejm/160973. eCollection 2023.
8
Women's childbirth experiences in the Swedish Post-term Induction Study (SWEPIS): a multicentre, randomised, controlled trial.瑞典过期引产研究(SWEPIS)中女性的分娩经历:一项多中心、随机对照试验。
BMJ Open. 2021 Apr 7;11(4):e042340. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-042340.
9
Childbirth Experience Questionnaire (CEQ) in the Sri Lankan setting: translation, cultural adaptation and validation into the Sinhala language.斯里兰卡环境下的分娩体验问卷(CEQ):翻译、文化适应及僧伽罗语版本的验证。
BMC Res Notes. 2020 Nov 13;13(1):534. doi: 10.1186/s13104-020-05380-z.
10
Cultural adaptation and psychometric evaluation of Childbirth Experience Questionnaire 2 in Karnataka state, India.印度卡纳塔克邦的《产时经历问卷 2》的文化调适和心理测量学评估。
PLoS One. 2023 Nov 28;18(11):e0291591. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0291591. eCollection 2023.

引用本文的文献

1
The importance of promoting positive childbirth experiences for women: a perspective paper.促进女性积极分娩体验的重要性:一篇观点论文。
Front Glob Womens Health. 2025 Jul 17;6:1599249. doi: 10.3389/fgwh.2025.1599249. eCollection 2025.
2
Cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric evaluation of the Chinese version of Childbirth Experience Questionnaire 2.0.《分娩体验问卷2.0中文版的跨文化适应与心理测量学评估》
Front Psychiatry. 2025 Jun 20;16:1488966. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1488966. eCollection 2025.
3
Assessment of childbirth experience over time-A prospective cohort study.不同时期分娩体验的评估——一项前瞻性队列研究。
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2025 Sep;104(9):1766-1773. doi: 10.1111/aogs.70010. Epub 2025 Jul 2.
4
Women's Childbirth Experiences in the WILL Randomised Trial (When to Induce Labour to Limit Risk in Pregnancy Hypertension): A Mixed Methods Analysis.WILL随机试验(何时引产以降低妊娠高血压风险)中女性的分娩经历:一项混合方法分析
BJOG. 2025 Sep;132(10):1426-1437. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.18257. Epub 2025 Jun 24.
5
Predictors of a positive birth experience in childbirth: A cross-sectional study.分娩中积极分娩体验的预测因素:一项横断面研究。
Heliyon. 2024 Sep 22;10(19):e38262. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e38262. eCollection 2024 Oct 15.
6
A cross-sectional study of low birth satisfaction during the COVID-19 epidemics' fifth wave.一项关于 COVID-19 疫情第五波期间出生满意度低的横断面研究。
Nurs Open. 2024 Sep;11(9):e70026. doi: 10.1002/nop2.70026.
7
Obstetric interventions' effects on the birthing experience.产科干预措施对分娩体验的影响。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2024 Jul 27;24(1):508. doi: 10.1186/s12884-024-06626-5.
8
Measuring Women's Satisfaction with Childbirth: A Literature Review of Measurement Properties.衡量女性对分娩的满意度:测量属性的文献综述
Zdr Varst. 2024 Mar 20;63(2):100-108. doi: 10.2478/sjph-2024-0014. eCollection 2024 Jun.
9
Cultural adaptation, validation and evaluation of the psychometric properties of Childbirth Experience Questionnaire version 2.0 in the Spanish context.文化调适、验证及评估西班牙文版生育经验问卷 2.0 的心理计量特性。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2024 Mar 19;24(1):207. doi: 10.1186/s12884-024-06400-7.
10
[Impact of hospital architecture on the birthing experience: a phenomenological study with mothers-to-be who are design experts].[医院建筑对分娩体验的影响:一项针对身为设计专家的准妈妈的现象学研究]
An Sist Sanit Navar. 2024 Feb 13;47(1):e1059. doi: 10.23938/ASSN.1059.

本文引用的文献

1
Randomized Trial of Labor Induction in Women 35 Years of Age or Older.35 岁及以上妇女引产随机试验。
N Engl J Med. 2016 Mar 3;374(9):813-22. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1509117.
2
Childbirth experience questionnaire: validating its use in the United Kingdom.分娩体验问卷:验证其在英国的使用情况。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2015 Apr 7;15:86. doi: 10.1186/s12884-015-0513-4.
3
Outcome measures in studies on the use of oxytocin for the treatment of delay in labour: a systematic review.使用缩宫素治疗产程延长的研究中的结局指标:一项系统评价
Midwifery. 2014 Sep;30(9):975-82. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2014.06.005. Epub 2014 Jul 1.
4
Childbirth experience questionnaire (CEQ): development and evaluation of a multidimensional instrument.分娩体验问卷(CEQ):多维工具的开发和评估。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2010 Dec 10;10:81. doi: 10.1186/1471-2393-10-81.
5
Factors related to childbirth satisfaction.与分娩满意度相关的因素。
J Adv Nurs. 2004 Apr;46(2):212-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2003.02981.x.
6
Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures.自我报告测量工具跨文化适应过程指南。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000 Dec 15;25(24):3186-91. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200012150-00014.

分娩体验问卷2:验证其在英国的使用情况。

Childbirth experience questionnaire 2: Validating its use in the United Kingdom.

作者信息

Walker Kate F, Dencker Anna, Thornton Jim G

机构信息

Maternity Department, Nottingham City Hospital, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, NG5 1PB, UK.

Centre for Person-centred Care, Institute of Health and Care Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.

出版信息

Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol X. 2019 Oct 3;5:100097. doi: 10.1016/j.eurox.2019.100097. eCollection 2020 Jan.

DOI:10.1016/j.eurox.2019.100097
PMID:32021972
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6994391/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To validate the Childbirth Experience Questionnaire 2 (CEQ2) in the UK to see if it is an effective tool for evaluating labour experience.

STUDY DESIGN

The CEQ2 and part of the Care Quality Commission Maternity Survey (2010) was sent to 475 women one month and six weeks after birth. It was tested for face validity among 25 postnatal mothers. Demographic data and delivery data was used to establish construct validity using the method of known-groups validation. The results of the scored CEQ2 sent out twice were used to measure test-retest reliability by calculating the quadratic weighted index of agreement between the two scores. Criterion validity was measured by calculating the Pearson correlation coefficient for the CEQ2 and Maternity Survey scores.

RESULTS

Face validity of the CEQ2 in a UK population was demonstrated with all respondents stating it was easy to understand and complete. A statistically significantly higher CEQ2 score for subgroups of women known to report a better birth outcome demonstrated construct validity. A weighted kappa of 0.55 demonstrated test-retest reliability. A Pearson correlation co-efficient of 0.56 demonstrated a moderate correlation between the results of the CEQ2 and the results of the 'gold standard' assessment of childbirth experience in the UK: the Maternity Survey and hence criterion validity.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrates that the Childbirth Experience Questionnaire version 2 (CEQ2) is a valid and reliable measure of childbirth experience in the UK population.

摘要

目的

在英国验证分娩体验问卷2(CEQ2),以确定其是否为评估分娩经历的有效工具。

研究设计

在产后1个月和6周时,将CEQ2及部分护理质量委员会产妇调查(2010年)问卷发送给475名女性。在25名产后母亲中对其表面效度进行了测试。使用已知群组验证方法,利用人口统计学数据和分娩数据来确定结构效度。通过计算两次发出的CEQ2评分结果之间的二次加权一致性指数,来测量重测信度。通过计算CEQ2与产妇调查得分之间的皮尔逊相关系数来测量效标效度。

结果

CEQ2在英国人群中的表面效度得到了证明,所有受访者均表示该问卷易于理解和填写。已知报告分娩结局较好的女性亚组的CEQ2得分在统计学上显著更高,证明了结构效度。加权kappa值为0.55,证明了重测信度。皮尔逊相关系数为0.56,表明CEQ2结果与英国分娩体验“金标准”评估(产妇调查)结果之间存在中度相关性,从而证明了效标效度。

结论

本研究表明,分娩体验问卷第2版(CEQ2)是衡量英国人群分娩体验的有效且可靠的工具。