• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

瑞典过期引产研究(SWEPIS)中女性的分娩经历:一项多中心、随机对照试验。

Women's childbirth experiences in the Swedish Post-term Induction Study (SWEPIS): a multicentre, randomised, controlled trial.

作者信息

Nilvér Helena, Wessberg Anna, Dencker Anna, Hagberg Henrik, Wennerholm Ulla-Britt, Fadl Helena, Wesström Jan, Sengpiel Verena, Lundgren Ingela, Bergh Christina, Wikström Anna-Karin, Saltvedt Sissel, Elden Helen

机构信息

Institute of Health and Care Sciences, Sahlgrenska Akademy, University of Gothenbourg, Gothenbourg, Sweden

Institute of Health and Care Sciences, Sahlgrenska Akademy, University of Gothenbourg, Gothenbourg, Sweden.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2021 Apr 7;11(4):e042340. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-042340.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2020-042340
PMID:33827832
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8031013/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare childbirth experiences in women randomly assigned to either induction of labour at 41 weeks or to expectant management until 42 weeks, in the Swedish Post-term Induction Study.

DESIGN

A register-based, multicentre, randomised, controlled, superiority trial.

SETTING

Women were recruited at 14 hospitals in Sweden, 2016-2018.

PARTICIPANTS

Women with an uncomplicated singleton pregnancy were recruited at 41 gestational weeks.

INTERVENTIONS

The women were randomly assigned to induction of labour at 41 weeks (induction group, n=1381) or expectant management until 42 weeks (expectant management group, n=1379).

OUTCOME MEASURES

As main outcome, women's childbirth experiences were measured using the Childbirth Experience Questionnaire version 2 (CEQ2), in 656 women, 3 months after the birth at three hospitals. As exploratory outcome, overall childbirth experience was measured in 1457 women using a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS 1-10) within 3 days after delivery at the remaining eleven hospitals.

RESULTS

The total response rate was 77% (2113/2760). There were no significant differences in childbirth experience measured with CEQ2 between the groups (induction group, n=354; expectant management group, n=302) in the subscales: (2.8 vs 2.7, p=0.09), (3.3 vs 3.2, p=0.06) and (3.6 vs 3.5, p=0.38) or in the total CEQ2 score (3.3 vs 3.2, p=0.07), respectively. Women in the induction group scored higher in the subscale (3.6 vs 3.4, p=0.02), although with a small effect size (0.19). No significant difference was observed in overall childbirth experience according to VAS (8.0 (n=735) vs 8.1 (n=735), p=0.22).

CONCLUSIONS

There were no differences in childbirth experience, according to CEQ2 or overall childbirth experience assessed with VAS, between women randomly assigned to induction of labour at 41 weeks or expectant management until 42 weeks. Overall, women rated their childbirth experiences high.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

ISRCTN26113652.

摘要

目的

在瑞典过期引产研究中,比较随机分配至41周引产或期待治疗至42周的女性的分娩体验。

设计

一项基于登记的多中心随机对照优效性试验。

设置

2016年至2018年期间,在瑞典的14家医院招募女性。

参与者

在妊娠41周时招募单胎妊娠且无并发症的女性。

干预措施

将女性随机分配至41周引产(引产组,n = 1381)或期待治疗至42周(期待治疗组,n = 1379)。

结局指标

作为主要结局,在三家医院产后3个月时,使用分娩体验问卷第2版(CEQ2)对656名女性的分娩体验进行测量。作为探索性结局,在其余11家医院分娩后3天内,使用视觉模拟量表(VAS 1 - 10)对1457名女性的总体分娩体验进行测量。

结果

总应答率为77%(2113/2760)。两组(引产组,n = 354;期待治疗组,n = 302)在以下子量表中,用CEQ2测量的分娩体验无显著差异:(2.8对2.7,p = 0.09)、(3.3对3.2,p = 0.06)和(3.6对3.5,p = 0.38),或在CEQ2总分中(3.3对3.2,p = 0.07)。引产组女性在子量表中得分更高(3.6对3.4,p = 0.02),尽管效应量较小(0.19)。根据VAS测量的总体分娩体验无显著差异(8.0(n = 735)对8.1(n = 735),p = 0.22)。

结论

随机分配至41周引产或期待治疗至42周的女性,根据CEQ2或用VAS评估的总体分娩体验,其分娩体验无差异。总体而言,女性对其分娩体验评价较高。

试验注册号

ISRCTN26113652。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/45dd/8031013/17952f70204b/bmjopen-2020-042340f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/45dd/8031013/af96c01aa80c/bmjopen-2020-042340f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/45dd/8031013/17952f70204b/bmjopen-2020-042340f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/45dd/8031013/af96c01aa80c/bmjopen-2020-042340f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/45dd/8031013/17952f70204b/bmjopen-2020-042340f02.jpg

相似文献

1
Women's childbirth experiences in the Swedish Post-term Induction Study (SWEPIS): a multicentre, randomised, controlled trial.瑞典过期引产研究(SWEPIS)中女性的分娩经历:一项多中心、随机对照试验。
BMJ Open. 2021 Apr 7;11(4):e042340. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-042340.
2
Dosage of oxytocin for augmentation of labor and women's childbirth experiences: A randomized controlled trial.缩宫素在引产和妇女分娩体验中的剂量:一项随机对照试验。
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2021 May;100(5):971-978. doi: 10.1111/aogs.14042. Epub 2021 Jan 28.
3
Induction of labour at 41 weeks versus expectant management and induction of labour at 42 weeks (SWEdish Post-term Induction Study, SWEPIS): multicentre, open label, randomised, superiority trial.41 周引产与期待管理及 42 周引产(SWEdish Post-term Induction Study,SWEPIS):多中心、开放标签、随机、优效性试验。
BMJ. 2019 Nov 20;367:l6131. doi: 10.1136/bmj.l6131.
4
Study protocol of SWEPIS a Swedish multicentre register based randomised controlled trial to compare induction of labour at 41 completed gestational weeks versus expectant management and induction at 42 completed gestational weeks.SWEPIS研究方案:一项基于瑞典多中心登记的随机对照试验,旨在比较妊娠41足周引产与期待治疗以及妊娠42足周引产的效果。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2016 Mar 7;16:49. doi: 10.1186/s12884-016-0836-9.
5
Overall childbirth experience: what does it mean? A comparison between an overall childbirth experience rating and the Childbirth Experience Questionnaire 2.总体分娩体验:它意味着什么?总体分娩体验评分与产时经历量表 2 的比较。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2023 Mar 14;23(1):176. doi: 10.1186/s12884-023-05498-5.
6
Efficacy and safety of oral misoprostol vs transvaginal balloon catheter for labor induction: An observational study within the SWEdish Postterm Induction Study (SWEPIS).口服米索前列醇与经阴道球囊导管用于引产的疗效和安全性:SWEdish Postterm Induction Study(SWEPIS)内的观察性研究。
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2021 Aug;100(8):1463-1477. doi: 10.1111/aogs.14155. Epub 2021 May 2.
7
Impact of Birthing Room Design on Maternal Childbirth Experience: Results From the Room4Birth Randomized Trial.分娩室设计对产妇分娩体验的影响:来自 Room4Birth 随机试验的结果。
HERD. 2023 Jan;16(1):200-218. doi: 10.1177/19375867221124232. Epub 2022 Oct 14.
8
Induction of labour at 41 weeks versus expectant management until 42 weeks (INDEX): multicentre, randomised non-inferiority trial.41 周引产与 42 周期待管理(INDEX):多中心、随机非劣效性试验。
BMJ. 2019 Feb 20;364:l344. doi: 10.1136/bmj.l344.
9
Assessing Dutch women's experiences of labour and birth: adaptations and psychometric evaluations of the measures Mothers on Autonomy in Decision Making Scale, Mothers on Respect Index, and Childbirth Experience Questionnaire 2.0.评估荷兰女性的分娩经历:自主决策量表、尊重指数和生育体验问卷 2.0 的测量方法的调整和心理计量学评估。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2022 Feb 18;22(1):134. doi: 10.1186/s12884-022-04445-0.
10
Induction of labour at 41 weeks of gestation versus expectant management and induction of labour at 42 weeks of gestation: A cost-effectiveness analysis.41 孕周引产与期待管理及 42 孕周引产的成本效益分析。
BJOG. 2022 Dec;129(13):2157-2165. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.16929. Epub 2021 Oct 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Women's Childbirth Experiences in the WILL Randomised Trial (When to Induce Labour to Limit Risk in Pregnancy Hypertension): A Mixed Methods Analysis.WILL随机试验(何时引产以降低妊娠高血压风险)中女性的分娩经历:一项混合方法分析
BJOG. 2025 Sep;132(10):1426-1437. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.18257. Epub 2025 Jun 24.
2
Evaluating women's experiences and satisfaction with labour induction in India: a comparison of the participant generated experience and satisfaction (PaGES) index with standard methods.评估印度女性引产的经历和满意度:将参与者生成的经历与满意度(PaGES)指数与标准方法进行比较。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2025 May 28;25(1):619. doi: 10.1186/s12884-025-07731-9.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Induction of labour at 41 weeks or expectant management until 42 weeks: A systematic review and an individual participant data meta-analysis of randomised trials.41 周引产或 42 周期待管理:随机试验的系统评价和个体参与者数据荟萃分析。
PLoS Med. 2020 Dec 8;17(12):e1003436. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003436. eCollection 2020 Dec.
2
What women want and why. Women's preferences for induction of labour or expectant management in late-term pregnancy.女性想要什么,以及为什么。女性对晚期妊娠引产或期待管理的偏好。
Women Birth. 2021 May;34(3):250-256. doi: 10.1016/j.wombi.2020.03.010. Epub 2020 May 20.
3
"I guess baby was just too comfy in there…": A qualitative study of women's experiences of elective late-term induction of labour.
Primiparous and multiparous women's birthing experiences and satisfaction with pain management in the first and second stages of vaginal delivery-A prospective cohort study.
初产妇和经产妇在阴道分娩第一和第二产程中的分娩经历及对疼痛管理的满意度——一项前瞻性队列研究。
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2025 Jun;104(6):1143-1152. doi: 10.1111/aogs.15083. Epub 2025 Apr 28.
4
Maternal and perinatal outcomes after implementation of a more active management in late- and postterm pregnancies in Sweden: A population-based cohort study.瑞典晚期及过期妊娠实施更积极管理后的孕产妇和围产期结局:一项基于人群的队列研究。
PLoS Med. 2025 Jan 16;22(1):e1004504. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1004504. eCollection 2025 Jan.
5
Use cases of registry-based randomized controlled trials-A review of the registries' contributions and constraints.基于注册的随机对照试验的应用案例——对注册研究的贡献和限制的回顾。
Clin Transl Sci. 2024 Nov;17(11):e70072. doi: 10.1111/cts.70072.
6
Motivations for and experience with labor induction at 39 weeks in women with obesity-A qualitative study.肥胖女性孕39周引产的动机与经历——一项定性研究
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2025 Jan;104(1):215-224. doi: 10.1111/aogs.14993. Epub 2024 Oct 31.
7
Impact of collegial midwifery assistance during second stage of labour on women's experience: a follow-up from the Swedish Oneplus randomised controlled trial.产程第二阶段助产士团队协助对产妇体验的影响:来自瑞典 Oneplus 随机对照试验的随访。
BMJ Open. 2024 Jul 27;14(7):e077458. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-077458.
8
Association of childbirth experience with long-term psychological outcomes: a prospective cohort study.分娩经历与长期心理结局的关联:一项前瞻性队列研究。
Reprod Health. 2024 May 30;21(1):71. doi: 10.1186/s12978-024-01819-9.
9
Women's experiences of childbirth during the COVID-19 pandemic in Lithuania.立陶宛女性在新冠疫情期间的分娩经历。
Eur J Midwifery. 2024 Apr 24;8. doi: 10.18332/ejm/185750. eCollection 2024.
10
'connEcted caesarean section': creating a virtual link between MOthers and their infanTs to ImprOve maternal childbirth experieNce - study protocol for a PILOT trial (e-motion-pilot).“连接式剖宫产”:在母婴之间建立虚拟联系以改善母婴分娩体验——一项 PILOT 试验(e-motion-pilot)的研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2023 Jun 7;13(6):e065830. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-065830.
“我猜宝宝在里面太舒服了……”:一项关于女性选择性晚期引产体验的定性研究。
Women Birth. 2021 May;34(3):242-249. doi: 10.1016/j.wombi.2020.03.012. Epub 2020 May 11.
4
Measuring women's experiences of decision-making and aspects of midwifery support: a confirmatory factor analysis of the revised Childbirth Experience Questionnaire.测量女性的决策体验和助产支持方面:修订后的《分娩体验问卷》的验证性因素分析。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2020 Apr 6;20(1):199. doi: 10.1186/s12884-020-02869-0.
5
Childbirth experience questionnaire 2: Validating its use in the United Kingdom.分娩体验问卷2:验证其在英国的使用情况。
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol X. 2019 Oct 3;5:100097. doi: 10.1016/j.eurox.2019.100097. eCollection 2020 Jan.
6
The impact of obstetric interventions and complications on women's satisfaction with childbirth a population based cohort study including 16,000 women.产科干预和并发症对产妇分娩满意度的影响:一项基于人群的队列研究,纳入了 16000 名女性。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2019 Dec 11;19(1):494. doi: 10.1186/s12884-019-2633-8.
7
Induction of labour at 41 weeks versus expectant management and induction of labour at 42 weeks (SWEdish Post-term Induction Study, SWEPIS): multicentre, open label, randomised, superiority trial.41 周引产与期待管理及 42 周引产(SWEdish Post-term Induction Study,SWEPIS):多中心、开放标签、随机、优效性试验。
BMJ. 2019 Nov 20;367:l6131. doi: 10.1136/bmj.l6131.
8
Women's experiences of waterbirth compared with conventional uncomplicated births.水中分娩与常规简单分娩的产妇体验比较。
Midwifery. 2019 Dec;79:102547. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2019.102547. Epub 2019 Sep 30.
9
Translation and Cultural Adaptation of the Childbirth Experience Questionnaire (CEQ) in Iran.《分娩体验问卷》(CEQ)在伊朗的翻译与文化调适
Iran J Nurs Midwifery Res. 2019 Jul-Aug;24(4):296-300. doi: 10.4103/ijnmr.IJNMR_103_18.
10
Childbirth experiences among women with fear of birth randomized to internet-based cognitive therapy or midwife counseling.产妇对基于互联网的认知疗法或助产士咨询的分娩体验恐惧随机分组。
J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol. 2020 Sep;41(3):205-214. doi: 10.1080/0167482X.2019.1634047. Epub 2019 Jun 27.