• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

临床鼻内镜检查、光学活检与人工智能在喉癌早期诊断及治疗规划中的比较:一项前瞻性观察研究。

Comparison of clinical nasal endoscopy, optical biopsy, and artificial intelligence in early diagnosis and treatment planning in laryngeal cancer: a prospective observational study.

作者信息

Hu Ruifang, Liu Xianping, Zhang Yong, Arthur Clement, Qin Dongguang

机构信息

Endoscopy Center, Shanxi Province Cancer Hospital/Shanxi Hospital Affiliated to Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences/Cancer Hospital Affiliated to Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan, China.

Head and Neck Surgery, First Shanxi Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan, China.

出版信息

Front Oncol. 2025 Jun 10;15:1582011. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2025.1582011. eCollection 2025.

DOI:10.3389/fonc.2025.1582011
PMID:40556680
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12185544/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Laryngeal cancer accounts for approximately 2% of all cancers globally and is considered one of the most aggressive types of head and neck cancer. Prompt diagnosis is crucial to improving survival and function. Direct laryngoscopy and imaging modalities are conventional diagnostic methods. However, laryngeal cancer diagnosis can be delayed, and early subtle mucosal changes can be missed. Flexible nasal endoscopy, particularly when integrated with artificial intelligence and optical biopsy methods, has shown promise in the early detection of laryngeal cancer. Yet, there is little literature on the combined experiences of these modalities.

METHODS

This prospective observational study involved 142 patients with suspected laryngeal cancer. All included patients underwent flexible nasal endoscopy with topical anesthesia. The patients were assessed using one or more optical biopsy techniques (Narrow Band Imaging [NBI], SPIES, or ISCAN), depending on available equipment and whether the lesions were visible. AI algorithms were retrospectively applied to endoscopic images to categorize lesions as cancerous or non-cancerous depending on vascular, textural, and color characteristics. The AI model was trained on a different pre-annotated dataset, and the images from the study cohort were not used to train the AI model - this methodologically ensures no bias has been introduced into the evaluation. Histopathology was used as the reference standard. Diagnostic performance was calculated using sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV).

RESULTS

The study revealed superior sensitivity (95.2%) and specificity (96.5%) with AI-enhanced endoscopy compared to conventional endoscopy (89.6%, 92.4%), respectively. Optical biopsy methods provided better visualization of lesions; however, not all patients had all three modalities in a single procedure. Diagnostic delay was shortened with a median time of 15 to 7 days (<0.001). Inter-rater agreement was strong overall (κ=0.84), with hoarseness having the most reliability, most likely due to better exposure of the glottis.

CONCLUSIONS

AI and selectively applied optical biopsy methods improved diagnostic accuracy in nasal endoscopy and reduced time delays for the early detection and management of laryngeal cancer. Further study in multicenters will allow for further validation of this work.

摘要

背景

喉癌约占全球所有癌症的2%,被认为是头颈癌中侵袭性最强的类型之一。及时诊断对于提高生存率和功能至关重要。直接喉镜检查和影像学检查是传统的诊断方法。然而,喉癌诊断可能会延迟,早期细微的黏膜变化可能会被遗漏。柔性鼻内镜检查,特别是与人工智能和光学活检方法相结合时,在喉癌的早期检测中显示出了前景。然而,关于这些方法联合应用的经验的文献很少。

方法

这项前瞻性观察性研究纳入了142例疑似喉癌患者。所有纳入的患者均接受了局部麻醉下的柔性鼻内镜检查。根据可用设备和病变是否可见,使用一种或多种光学活检技术(窄带成像[NBI]、SPIES或ISCAN)对患者进行评估。人工智能算法被回顾性应用于内镜图像,根据血管、纹理和颜色特征将病变分类为癌性或非癌性。人工智能模型是在一个不同的预先标注的数据集上进行训练的,研究队列的图像未用于训练人工智能模型——这种方法学确保在评估中没有引入偏差。组织病理学被用作参考标准。使用灵敏度、特异度、阳性预测值(PPV)和阴性预测值(NPV)计算诊断性能。

结果

研究显示,与传统内镜检查(分别为89.6%、92.4%)相比,人工智能增强内镜检查的灵敏度(95.2%)和特异度(96.5%)更高。光学活检方法能更好地观察病变;然而,并非所有患者在一次检查中都能接受所有三种方法。诊断延迟缩短,中位时间从15天缩短至7天(<0.001)。总体而言,评分者间一致性较强(κ=0.84),声音嘶哑的可靠性最高,最可能是由于声门暴露更好。

结论

人工智能和选择性应用的光学活检方法提高了鼻内镜检查的诊断准确性,并减少了喉癌早期检测和管理的时间延迟。多中心的进一步研究将有助于对这项工作进行进一步验证。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0e75/12185544/1a66fda6e772/fonc-15-1582011-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0e75/12185544/74029e7e0fc3/fonc-15-1582011-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0e75/12185544/b127a2ca05da/fonc-15-1582011-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0e75/12185544/473bd816e704/fonc-15-1582011-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0e75/12185544/427fce9b7000/fonc-15-1582011-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0e75/12185544/1a66fda6e772/fonc-15-1582011-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0e75/12185544/74029e7e0fc3/fonc-15-1582011-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0e75/12185544/b127a2ca05da/fonc-15-1582011-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0e75/12185544/473bd816e704/fonc-15-1582011-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0e75/12185544/427fce9b7000/fonc-15-1582011-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0e75/12185544/1a66fda6e772/fonc-15-1582011-g005.jpg

相似文献

1
Comparison of clinical nasal endoscopy, optical biopsy, and artificial intelligence in early diagnosis and treatment planning in laryngeal cancer: a prospective observational study.临床鼻内镜检查、光学活检与人工智能在喉癌早期诊断及治疗规划中的比较:一项前瞻性观察研究。
Front Oncol. 2025 Jun 10;15:1582011. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2025.1582011. eCollection 2025.
2
Signs and symptoms to determine if a patient presenting in primary care or hospital outpatient settings has COVID-19.在基层医疗机构或医院门诊环境中,如果患者出现以下症状和体征,可判断其是否患有 COVID-19。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 May 20;5(5):CD013665. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013665.pub3.
3
Diagnostic test accuracy and cost-effectiveness of tests for codeletion of chromosomal arms 1p and 19q in people with glioma.染色体臂 1p 和 19q 缺失的检测在胶质瘤患者中的诊断准确性和成本效益。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Mar 2;3(3):CD013387. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013387.pub2.
4
A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of paclitaxel, docetaxel, gemcitabine and vinorelbine in non-small-cell lung cancer.对紫杉醇、多西他赛、吉西他滨和长春瑞滨在非小细胞肺癌中的临床疗效和成本效益进行的快速系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(32):1-195. doi: 10.3310/hta5320.
5
Transabdominal ultrasound and endoscopic ultrasound for diagnosis of gallbladder polyps.经腹超声和内镜超声用于胆囊息肉的诊断。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Aug 15;8(8):CD012233. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012233.pub2.
6
Surveillance of Barrett's oesophagus: exploring the uncertainty through systematic review, expert workshop and economic modelling.巴雷特食管的监测:通过系统评价、专家研讨会和经济模型探索不确定性
Health Technol Assess. 2006 Mar;10(8):1-142, iii-iv. doi: 10.3310/hta10080.
7
Systemic treatments for metastatic cutaneous melanoma.转移性皮肤黑色素瘤的全身治疗
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Feb 6;2(2):CD011123. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011123.pub2.
8
Drugs for preventing postoperative nausea and vomiting in adults after general anaesthesia: a network meta-analysis.成人全身麻醉后预防术后恶心呕吐的药物:网状Meta分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Oct 19;10(10):CD012859. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012859.pub2.
9
The impact of artificial intelligence on the endoscopic assessment of inflammatory bowel disease-related neoplasia.人工智能对炎症性肠病相关肿瘤内镜评估的影响。
Therap Adv Gastroenterol. 2025 Jun 23;18:17562848251348574. doi: 10.1177/17562848251348574. eCollection 2025.
10
A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of topotecan for ovarian cancer.拓扑替康治疗卵巢癌的临床有效性和成本效益的快速系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(28):1-110. doi: 10.3310/hta5280.

本文引用的文献

1
Artificial Intelligence in Oral Cancer: A Comprehensive Scoping Review of Diagnostic and Prognostic Applications.口腔癌中的人工智能:诊断与预后应用的全面范围综述
Diagnostics (Basel). 2025 Jan 24;15(3):280. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics15030280.
2
Machine Learning of Endoscopy Images to Identify, Classify, and Segment Sinonasal Masses.用于识别、分类和分割鼻窦肿物的内镜图像机器学习
Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2025 May;15(5):524-535. doi: 10.1002/alr.23525. Epub 2025 Jan 8.
3
Recent advances of photodiagnosis and treatment for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.
头颈部鳞状细胞癌的光诊断与治疗的最新进展
Neoplasia. 2025 Feb;60:101118. doi: 10.1016/j.neo.2024.101118. Epub 2024 Dec 24.
4
Application of artificial intelligence in laryngeal lesions: a systematic review and meta-analysis.人工智能在喉部病变中的应用:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2025 Mar;282(3):1543-1555. doi: 10.1007/s00405-024-09075-0. Epub 2024 Nov 22.
5
Self-Attention Mechanisms-Based Laryngoscopy Image Classification Technique for Laryngeal Cancer Detection.基于自注意力机制的喉镜图像分类技术用于喉癌检测
Head Neck. 2025 Mar;47(3):944-955. doi: 10.1002/hed.27999. Epub 2024 Nov 11.
6
Advancing precise diagnosis of nasopharyngeal carcinoma through endoscopy-based radiomics analysis.通过基于内镜的影像组学分析推进鼻咽癌的精准诊断。
iScience. 2024 Jul 26;27(9):110590. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2024.110590. eCollection 2024 Sep 20.
7
Computer Vision and Videomics in Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery: Bridging the Gap Between Clinical Needs and the Promise of Artificial Intelligence.耳鼻喉头颈外科中的计算机视觉与视频组学:弥合临床需求与人工智能前景之间的差距。
Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 2024 Oct;57(5):703-718. doi: 10.1016/j.otc.2024.05.005. Epub 2024 Jul 8.
8
A machine learning approach for vocal fold segmentation and disorder classification based on ensemble method.基于集成方法的声带分割和障碍分类的机器学习方法。
Sci Rep. 2024 Jun 23;14(1):14435. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-64987-5.
9
Deep learning algorithm for the automated detection and classification of nasal cavity mass in nasal endoscopic images.深度学习算法在鼻内镜图像中鼻腔肿块的自动检测和分类。
PLoS One. 2024 Mar 13;19(3):e0297536. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0297536. eCollection 2024.
10
Impact of Diagnostic and Treatment Delays on Survival and Treatment-Related Toxicities in Portuguese Patients With Head and Neck Cancer.诊断和治疗延迟对葡萄牙头颈癌患者生存及治疗相关毒性的影响
Cureus. 2024 Jan 27;16(1):e53039. doi: 10.7759/cureus.53039. eCollection 2024 Jan.