• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

州府城市母亲接受宫颈癌筛查的情况及障碍:一项描述性横断面研究

Acceptance and barriers to cervical cancer screening among mothers in a state-capital city: a descriptive cross-sectional study.

作者信息

Oduwoye Afusat O, Olabisi Elisha O, Ojo Elizabeth F, Dosumu Taiwo O, Owoeye Michael O, Tijani Adelani, Esan Deborah T

机构信息

Community Health Department, Osun State University Teaching Hospital, Osogbo 230001, Nigeria.

Faculty of Nursing Sciences, Ladoke Akintola University of Technology, Ogbomoso 210214, Nigeria.

出版信息

Ecancermedicalscience. 2025 May 29;19:1916. doi: 10.3332/ecancer.2025.1916. eCollection 2025.

DOI:10.3332/ecancer.2025.1916
PMID:40556804
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12185862/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Cervical cancer is a reproductive malignancy that may be detected in its pre-invasive stage by regular cytological screening.

OBJECTIVE

This study assessed the acceptance of cervical cancer screening among mothers attending infant welfare clinics in hospitals in Osogbo, Osun State, Nigeria.

METHODS

A descriptive cross-sectional design was employed, with questionnaires administered to 355 respondents, selected using Fisher's formula. A multistage sampling technique was used to ensure a representative sample. Data were analysed using descriptive and inferential statistical methods. Relationships between variables were tested using chi-square and Fisher's exact tests at a 5% significance level.

RESULT

Approximately half (46.9%) had adequate knowledge of cervical cancer and its screening. More than half (55.7%) had low susceptibility to cervical cancer. About two-thirds (61.6%) were willing to undergo cervical cancer screening while only a quarter (25.9%) had undergone the screening test. Barriers to cervical cancer screening include lack of awareness, fear, perceived immunity, cost, pain and embarrassment while motivators include integration with general health screenings and perceived necessity. Findings suggest there is a statistically significant association between mothers' age, marital status, ethnicity, knowledge of cervical cancer, susceptibility to cervical cancer and cervical cancer screening acceptability.

CONCLUSION

Acceptance of screening was high which was significantly influenced by their degree of knowledge and susceptibility to cervical cancer. However, screening acceptance was not consistent with their low uptake.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

There is a need for continuous education and policies to minimise costs and ensure accessibility to the screening test to promote and improve its uptake thus reducing morbidities and mortalities associated with the disease.

摘要

背景

宫颈癌是一种生殖系统恶性肿瘤,通过定期细胞学筛查可在其癌前阶段被检测出来。

目的

本研究评估了尼日利亚奥孙州奥索博市医院母婴保健诊所的母亲们对宫颈癌筛查的接受程度。

方法

采用描述性横断面设计,使用费舍尔公式选取355名受访者进行问卷调查。采用多阶段抽样技术以确保样本具有代表性。使用描述性和推断性统计方法对数据进行分析。在5%的显著性水平下,使用卡方检验和费舍尔精确检验来检验变量之间的关系。

结果

约一半(46.9%)的人对宫颈癌及其筛查有足够的了解。超过一半(55.7%)的人对宫颈癌的易感性较低。约三分之二(61.6%)的人愿意接受宫颈癌筛查,而只有四分之一(25.9%)的人接受过筛查测试。宫颈癌筛查的障碍包括缺乏意识、恐惧、自认为有免疫力、费用、疼痛和尴尬,而激励因素包括与一般健康筛查相结合以及自认为有必要。研究结果表明,母亲的年龄、婚姻状况、种族、对宫颈癌的了解、对宫颈癌的易感性与宫颈癌筛查可接受性之间存在统计学上的显著关联。

结论

筛查的接受度较高,这受到她们对宫颈癌的了解程度和易感性的显著影响。然而,筛查接受度与低参与率并不一致。

对实践的启示

需要持续开展教育并制定政策,以降低成本并确保能够获得筛查测试,从而促进和提高其参与率,进而降低与该疾病相关的发病率和死亡率。

相似文献

1
Acceptance and barriers to cervical cancer screening among mothers in a state-capital city: a descriptive cross-sectional study.州府城市母亲接受宫颈癌筛查的情况及障碍:一项描述性横断面研究
Ecancermedicalscience. 2025 May 29;19:1916. doi: 10.3332/ecancer.2025.1916. eCollection 2025.
2
Home treatment for mental health problems: a systematic review.心理健康问题的居家治疗:一项系统综述
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(15):1-139. doi: 10.3310/hta5150.
3
Interventions targeted at women to encourage the uptake of cervical screening.针对女性的干预措施,以鼓励她们接受宫颈癌筛查。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Sep 6;9(9):CD002834. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002834.pub3.
4
A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of paclitaxel, docetaxel, gemcitabine and vinorelbine in non-small-cell lung cancer.对紫杉醇、多西他赛、吉西他滨和长春瑞滨在非小细胞肺癌中的临床疗效和成本效益进行的快速系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(32):1-195. doi: 10.3310/hta5320.
5
Intravenous magnesium sulphate and sotalol for prevention of atrial fibrillation after coronary artery bypass surgery: a systematic review and economic evaluation.静脉注射硫酸镁和索他洛尔预防冠状动脉搭桥术后房颤:系统评价与经济学评估
Health Technol Assess. 2008 Jun;12(28):iii-iv, ix-95. doi: 10.3310/hta12280.
6
A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of topotecan for ovarian cancer.拓扑替康治疗卵巢癌的临床有效性和成本效益的快速系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(28):1-110. doi: 10.3310/hta5280.
7
Behavioral interventions to reduce risk for sexual transmission of HIV among men who have sex with men.降低男男性行为者中艾滋病毒性传播风险的行为干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008 Jul 16(3):CD001230. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001230.pub2.
8
The Utility of an Human Papillomavirus Genotype Assay for Cancer Screening in Self-Collected Urine and Vaginal Samples from Japanese Women.人乳头瘤病毒基因分型检测在日本女性自行采集的尿液和阴道样本癌症筛查中的效用
Gynecol Obstet Invest. 2025;90(2):143-152. doi: 10.1159/000541641. Epub 2024 Oct 7.
9
Signs and symptoms to determine if a patient presenting in primary care or hospital outpatient settings has COVID-19.在基层医疗机构或医院门诊环境中,如果患者出现以下症状和体征,可判断其是否患有 COVID-19。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 May 20;5(5):CD013665. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013665.pub3.
10
Diagnostic test accuracy and cost-effectiveness of tests for codeletion of chromosomal arms 1p and 19q in people with glioma.染色体臂 1p 和 19q 缺失的检测在胶质瘤患者中的诊断准确性和成本效益。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Mar 2;3(3):CD013387. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013387.pub2.

本文引用的文献

1
Combined Oral Contraceptive Use and the Risk of Cervical Cancer: Literature Review.联合使用口服避孕药与宫颈癌风险:文献综述。
Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. 2023 Dec;45(12):e818-e824. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-1776403. Epub 2023 Dec 23.
2
Knowledge and acceptability of cervical cancer screening among female undergraduates in Babcock University Ilishan-Remo, Ogun State, Nigeria.尼日利亚奥贡州伊莱山-雷莫巴科克大学女大学生对宫颈癌筛查的知晓情况和接受程度
Ecancermedicalscience. 2023 Jan 31;17:1502. doi: 10.3332/ecancer.2023.1502. eCollection 2023.
3
The effectiveness of health education interventions on cervical cancer prevention in Africa: A systematic review.健康教育干预措施在非洲预防宫颈癌中的有效性:系统评价。
Prev Med. 2022 Nov;164:107219. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2022.107219. Epub 2022 Aug 22.
4
Intramarital Status Differences across Africa's Educational Expansion.非洲教育扩张过程中的婚姻状况差异。
J Marriage Fam. 2020 Apr;82(2):733-750. doi: 10.1111/jomf.12632. Epub 2019 Dec 2.
5
Design and feasibility of a novel program of cervical screening in Nigeria: self-sampled HPV testing paired with visual triage.尼日利亚一项新型宫颈癌筛查项目的设计与可行性:自我采样的人乳头瘤病毒检测与视觉分诊相结合
Infect Agent Cancer. 2020 Oct 14;15:60. doi: 10.1186/s13027-020-00324-5. eCollection 2020.
6
Factors Associated with Cervical Cancer Screening Uptake: Implications for the Health of Women in Jordan.与宫颈癌筛查普及率相关的因素:对约旦女性健康的影响。
Infect Dis Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Mar 21;2020:9690473. doi: 10.1155/2020/9690473. eCollection 2020.
7
Knowledge, attitude and practice of cervical cancer prevention, among women residing in an urban slum in Lagos, South West, Nigeria.尼日利亚西南部拉各斯一个城市贫民窟中女性对宫颈癌预防的知识、态度和实践情况。
Pan Afr Med J. 2019 Mar 18;32:130. doi: 10.11604/pamj.2019.32.130.14432. eCollection 2019.
8
Cervical cancer screening history prior to a diagnosis of cervical cancer in Danish women aged 60 years and older-A national cohort study.丹麦 60 岁及以上女性宫颈癌诊断前的宫颈癌筛查史:一项全国队列研究。
Cancer Med. 2019 Jan;8(1):418-427. doi: 10.1002/cam4.1926. Epub 2019 Jan 1.
9
Reducing incidence of cervical cancer: knowledge and attitudes of caregivers in Nigerian city to human papilloma virus vaccination.降低宫颈癌发病率:尼日利亚某城市护理人员对人乳头瘤病毒疫苗接种的认知与态度
Infect Agent Cancer. 2018 Aug 17;13:29. doi: 10.1186/s13027-018-0202-9. eCollection 2018.
10
Does health literacy mediate the relationship between socioeconomic status and health disparities? Integrative review.健康素养是否介导了社会经济地位与健康差距之间的关系?综合综述。
Health Promot Int. 2019 Oct 1;34(5):e1-e17. doi: 10.1093/heapro/day062.