Kheirabadi Dorna, Gunaseelan Vidhya, Lai Yenling, Brummett Chad M, Waljee Jennifer F, Englesbe Michael J, Bicket Mark C
From the Department of Anesthesiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.
Overdose Prevention Engagement Network, Institute for Healthcare Policy and Innovation, University of Michigan School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.
Ann Surg Open. 2025 Apr 23;6(2):e571. doi: 10.1097/AS9.0000000000000571. eCollection 2025 Jun.
The aim is to compare opioid prescription, consumption, and patient-reported and clinical outcomes after surgical discharge pre- versus post-COVID-19 pandemic.
Numerous studies have demonstrated negative health outcomes after pandemic onset. However, the impact on postoperative opioid use, pain, and relevant outcomes is unclear.
Using interrupted time series analysis, we examined opioid-naive adults undergoing a variety of surgical procedures across 69 hospitals in a statewide quality collaborative, adjusting for demographic and clinical factors. We compared postsurgical outcomes in the prepandemic period (June 1, 2018-February 29, 2020) and the postpandemic period (June 1, 2020-December 31, 2021). Primary outcomes included 30-day opioid prescriptions and patient-reported consumption; secondary outcomes included patient-reported pain, quality of life, satisfaction, and surgical regret; and the composite outcome included 30-day complications, readmissions, and emergency department visits.
The primary analysis included 18,031 patients in the prepandemic group and 19,973 in the postpandemic group. Adjusted analyses showed no significant impact of the pandemic on opioid prescribing (level change in any prescription: -0.012 [95% confidence interval (CI): -0.073 to 0.048]; number of pills prescribed: 0.863 [95% CI: -0.277 to 2.003]) or opioid consumption (level change in amount consumed: 0.614 [95% CI: -11.748 to 12.977]). No differences appeared in patient-reported outcomes or composite outcomes of 30-day complications, readmissions, and emergency room visits ( for all level change >0.05).
The absence of significant changes in opioid prescribing or consumption, clinical outcomes, and patient-reported outcomes suggest that certain quality improvement outcomes may have been resilient to disruptions caused by the COVID-19 pandemic.
比较新型冠状病毒肺炎大流行之前与之后手术出院后的阿片类药物处方、使用情况以及患者报告的和临床的结果。
众多研究已证明大流行开始后对健康产生了负面结果。然而,其对术后阿片类药物使用、疼痛及相关结果的影响尚不清楚。
采用中断时间序列分析,我们研究了全州质量协作中69家医院接受各种外科手术的未使用过阿片类药物的成年人,并对人口统计学和临床因素进行了调整。我们比较了大流行前时期(2018年6月1日至2020年2月29日)和大流行后时期(2020年6月1日至2021年12月31日)的术后结果。主要结果包括30天阿片类药物处方和患者报告的使用量;次要结果包括患者报告的疼痛、生活质量、满意度和手术遗憾;综合结果包括30天并发症、再入院和急诊就诊。
主要分析包括大流行前组的18,031名患者和大流行后组的19,973名患者。调整后的分析显示,大流行对阿片类药物处方(任何处方的水平变化:-0.012 [95%置信区间(CI):-0.073至0.048];处方药丸数量:0.863 [95% CI:-0.277至2.003])或阿片类药物使用量(使用量的水平变化:0.614 [95% CI:-11.748至12.977])没有显著影响。患者报告的结果或30天并发症、再入院和急诊就诊的综合结果也没有差异(所有水平变化>0.05)。
阿片类药物处方或使用量、临床结果以及患者报告的结果均无显著变化,这表明某些质量改进结果可能对新型冠状病毒肺炎大流行造成的干扰具有弹性。