• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

招募乳腺导管原位癌女性参加随机对照试验:LORIS 研究的经验教训。

Recruiting women with ductal carcinoma in situ to a randomised controlled trial: lessons from the LORIS study.

机构信息

Sussex Health Outcomes Research & Education in Cancer (SHORE-C), Brighton & Sussex Medical School, University of Sussex, Falmer, Brighton, BN1 9RX, UK.

Cancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit, Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK.

出版信息

Trials. 2023 Oct 14;24(1):670. doi: 10.1186/s13063-023-07703-4.

DOI:10.1186/s13063-023-07703-4
PMID:37838682
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10576350/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The LOw RISk DCIS (LORIS) study was set up to compare conventional surgical treatment with active monitoring in women with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). Recruitment to trials with a surveillance arm is known to be challenging, so strategies to maximise patient recruitment, aimed at both patients and recruiting centres, were implemented.

METHODS

Women aged ≥ 46 years with a histologically confirmed diagnosis of non-high-grade DCIS were eligible for 1:1 randomisation to either surgery or active monitoring. Prior to randomisation, all eligible women were invited to complete: (1) the Clinical Trials Questionnaire (CTQ) examining reasons for or against participation, and (2) interviews exploring in depth opinions about the study information sheets and film. Women agreeing to randomisation completed validated questionnaires assessing health status, physical and mental health, and anxiety levels. Hospital site staff were invited to communication workshops and refresher site initiation visits to support recruitment. Their perspectives on LORIS recruitment were collected via surveys and interviews.

RESULTS

Eighty percent (181/227) of eligible women agreed to be randomised. Over 40% of participants had high anxiety levels at baseline. On the CTQ, the most frequent most important reasons for accepting randomisation were altruism and belief that the trial offered the best treatment, whilst worries about randomisation and the influences of others were the most frequent most important reasons for declining. Most women found the study information provided clear and useful. Communication workshops for site staff improved knowledge and confidence but only about half said they themselves would join LORIS if eligible. The most common recruitment barriers identified by staff were low numbers of eligible patients and patient preference.

CONCLUSIONS

Recruitment to LORIS was challenging despite strategies aimed at both patients and site staff. Ensuring that recruiting staff support the study could improve recruitment in similar future trials.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ISRCTN27544579, prospectively registered on 22 May 2014.

摘要

背景

LOw RISk DCIS(LORIS)研究旨在比较导管原位癌(DCIS)女性的常规手术治疗与主动监测。已知具有监测臂的试验的入组具有挑战性,因此实施了旨在最大化患者招募的策略,既针对患者又针对招募中心。

方法

年龄≥46 岁且经组织学证实为非高级别 DCIS 的女性有资格进行 1:1 随机分组,分别接受手术或主动监测。在随机分组之前,所有符合条件的女性都被邀请完成:(1)临床试验问卷(CTQ),检查参与或反对的原因;(2)访谈,深入探讨对研究信息表和电影的看法。同意随机分组的女性完成了评估健康状况、身心健康和焦虑水平的经过验证的问卷。医院工作人员受邀参加沟通研讨会和重新启动站点的入职访问,以支持招募。通过调查和访谈收集他们对 LORIS 招募的看法。

结果

80%(181/227)符合条件的女性同意进行随机分组。超过 40%的参与者在基线时有较高的焦虑水平。在 CTQ 上,接受随机分组的最重要原因是利他主义和相信试验提供了最佳治疗,而对随机分组的担忧和他人的影响是拒绝的最重要原因。大多数女性认为提供的研究信息清晰有用。针对工作人员的沟通研讨会提高了他们的知识和信心,但只有一半的工作人员表示,如果自己符合条件,他们自己也会加入 LORIS。工作人员确定的最常见招募障碍是符合条件的患者数量少和患者偏好。

结论

尽管针对患者和工作人员都实施了策略,但 LORIS 的招募仍具有挑战性。确保招募工作人员支持该研究可能会改善未来类似试验的招募。

试验注册

ISRCTN27544579,于 2014 年 5 月 22 日前瞻性注册。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b9ae/10576350/ce93c993c857/13063_2023_7703_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b9ae/10576350/4513729323ee/13063_2023_7703_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b9ae/10576350/ce93c993c857/13063_2023_7703_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b9ae/10576350/4513729323ee/13063_2023_7703_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b9ae/10576350/ce93c993c857/13063_2023_7703_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Recruiting women with ductal carcinoma in situ to a randomised controlled trial: lessons from the LORIS study.招募乳腺导管原位癌女性参加随机对照试验:LORIS 研究的经验教训。
Trials. 2023 Oct 14;24(1):670. doi: 10.1186/s13063-023-07703-4.
2
Do LORIS Trial Eligibility Criteria Identify a Ductal Carcinoma In Situ Patient Population at Low Risk of Upgrade to Invasive Carcinoma?LORIS试验的入选标准能否识别出原位导管癌患者中升级为浸润性癌风险较低的人群?
Ann Surg Oncol. 2016 Oct;23(11):3487-3493. doi: 10.1245/s10434-016-5268-2. Epub 2016 May 12.
3
Ductal Carcinoma In Situ - Quo Vadis?导管原位癌——路在何方?
Chirurgia (Bucur). 2021 Dec;116(5 Suppl):S5-S6.
4
Women with Low-Risk DCIS Eligible for the LORIS Trial After Complete Surgical Excision: How Low Is Their Risk After Standard Therapy?完全手术切除后符合LORIS试验条件的低风险导管原位癌女性:标准治疗后她们的风险有多低?
Ann Surg Oncol. 2016 Dec;23(13):4253-4261. doi: 10.1245/s10434-016-5595-3. Epub 2016 Oct 20.
5
Surgical Upstaging Rates for Vacuum Assisted Biopsy Proven DCIS: Implications for Active Surveillance Trials.真空辅助活检证实的 DCIS 的手术升级率:对主动监测试验的影响。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2017 Nov;24(12):3534-3540. doi: 10.1245/s10434-017-6018-9. Epub 2017 Aug 9.
6
Concordance between vacuum assisted biopsy and postoperative histology: implications for the proposed Low Risk DCIS Trial (LORIS).真空辅助活检与术后组织学的一致性:对拟议的低危 DCIS 试验(LORIS)的影响。
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2013 Dec;39(12):1337-40. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2013.09.028. Epub 2013 Oct 9.
7
Do Eligibility Criteria for Ductal Carcinoma In Situ (DCIS) Active Surveillance Trials Identify Patients at Low Risk for Upgrade to Invasive Carcinoma?导管原位癌(DCIS)主动监测试验的纳入标准能否识别低风险升级为浸润性癌的患者?
Ann Surg Oncol. 2020 Oct;27(11):4459-4465. doi: 10.1245/s10434-020-08576-6. Epub 2020 May 16.
8
Proportion of Patients With Ductal Carcinoma In Situ That Qualify for Observation Criteria Set Forth by Clinical Trials.符合临床试验设定的观察标准的导管原位癌患者比例。
J Surg Oncol. 2025 Feb;131(2):115-123. doi: 10.1002/jso.27858. Epub 2024 Sep 19.
9
Feasibility of the Less Is More Approach in Treating Low-Risk Ductal Carcinoma In Situ Diagnosed on Core Needle Biopsy: Ten-Year Review of Ductal Carcinoma In Situ Upgraded to Invasion at Surgery.低危核心针活检诊断为导管原位癌(DCIS)中“少即是多”治疗策略的可行性:手术时升级为浸润性癌的 DCIS 十年回顾。
Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2018 Sep;142(9):1120-1126. doi: 10.5858/arpa.2017-0268-OA. Epub 2018 Mar 27.
10
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.

引用本文的文献

1
Is axillary surgery still justified in DCIS diagnosed via vacuum-assisted biopsy?对于通过真空辅助活检诊断出的导管原位癌,腋窝手术是否仍有必要?
World J Surg Oncol. 2025 Jul 12;23(1):275. doi: 10.1186/s12957-025-03926-8.
2
Mammography screening and incidence of ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast in Italy: an age-period-cohort analysis.意大利乳腺钼靶筛查与乳腺导管原位癌发病率:年龄-时期-队列分析
Int J Epidemiol. 2025 Jun 11;54(4). doi: 10.1093/ije/dyaf102.
3
Three-Dimensional Models: Biomimetic Tools That Recapitulate Breast Tissue Architecture and Microenvironment to Study Ductal Carcinoma In Situ Transition to Invasive Ductal Breast Cancer.

本文引用的文献

1
Ductal Carcinoma in Situ: State-of-the-Art Review.导管原位癌:最新综述。
Radiology. 2022 Feb;302(2):246-255. doi: 10.1148/radiol.211839. Epub 2021 Dec 21.
2
Digital tools in the informed consent process: a systematic review.知情同意过程中的数字工具:一项系统综述
BMC Med Ethics. 2021 Feb 27;22(1):18. doi: 10.1186/s12910-021-00585-8.
3
Factors that impact on recruitment to randomised trials in health care: a qualitative evidence synthesis.影响医疗保健领域随机试验招募的因素:一项定性证据综合分析
三维模型:模拟乳腺组织结构和微环境以研究导管原位癌向浸润性导管癌转变的仿生工具。
Cells. 2025 Feb 4;14(3):220. doi: 10.3390/cells14030220.
4
Patient-Reported Outcomes for Low-Risk Ductal Carcinoma In Situ: A Secondary Analysis of the COMET Randomized Clinical Trial.低风险导管原位癌患者报告的结局:COMET随机临床试验的二次分析
JAMA Oncol. 2025 Mar 1;11(3):300-309. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2024.6556.
5
Defining precancer: a grand challenge for the cancer community.定义癌前病变:癌症领域的重大挑战。
Nat Rev Cancer. 2024 Nov;24(11):792-809. doi: 10.1038/s41568-024-00744-0. Epub 2024 Oct 1.
6
Risk perception of patients with ductal carcinoma (DCIS) of the breast and their healthcare practitioners: The importance of histopathological terminology, and the gaps in our knowledge.乳腺导管原位癌(DCIS)患者及其医护人员的风险认知:组织病理学术语的重要性以及我们知识上的差距。
Histol Histopathol. 2025 Mar;40(3):297-306. doi: 10.14670/HH-18-806. Epub 2024 Sep 3.
7
Survival outcomes after omission of surgery for ductal carcinoma in situ.导管原位癌手术省略后的生存结果。
NPJ Breast Cancer. 2024 Sep 20;10(1):82. doi: 10.1038/s41523-024-00689-5.
8
Radiology for Ductal Carcinoma In Situ of the Breast: Updates on Invasive Cancer Progression and Active Monitoring.乳腺导管原位癌的放射学:浸润性癌进展和主动监测的更新。
Korean J Radiol. 2024 Aug;25(8):698-705. doi: 10.3348/kjr.2024.0117. Epub 2024 Jul 4.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Oct 7;10(10):MR000045. doi: 10.1002/14651858.MR000045.pub2.
4
What are the optimal measures to identify anxiety and depression in people diagnosed with head and neck cancer (HNC): a systematic review.对于已诊断为头颈癌(HNC)的患者,识别焦虑和抑郁的最佳措施有哪些:一项系统综述。
J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2020 Apr 23;4(1):26. doi: 10.1186/s41687-020-00189-7.
5
The COMET (Comparison of Operative versus Monitoring and Endocrine Therapy) trial: a phase III randomised controlled clinical trial for low-risk ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS).COMET(手术与监测和内分泌治疗比较)试验:一项针对低危导管原位癌(DCIS)的 III 期随机对照临床试验。
BMJ Open. 2019 Mar 12;9(3):e026797. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026797.
6
Renaming low risk conditions labelled as cancer.重新命名被标记为癌症的低风险病症。
BMJ. 2018 Aug 12;362:k3322. doi: 10.1136/bmj.k3322.
7
Current approach and future perspective for ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast.乳腺导管原位癌的当前治疗方法与未来展望
Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2017 Aug 1;47(8):671-677. doi: 10.1093/jjco/hyx059.
8
Finding the balance between over- and under-treatment of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS).找到导管原位癌(DCIS)过度治疗与治疗不足之间的平衡。
Breast. 2017 Feb;31:274-283. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2016.09.001. Epub 2016 Sep 23.
9
Addressing overtreatment of screen detected DCIS; the LORIS trial.解决过度治疗筛查出的 DCIS 问题;LORIS 试验。
Eur J Cancer. 2015 Nov;51(16):2296-303. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2015.07.017. Epub 2015 Aug 18.
10
Feasibility of a prospective, randomised, open-label, international multicentre, phase III, non-inferiority trial to assess the safety of active surveillance for low risk ductal carcinoma in situ - The LORD study.一项前瞻性、随机、开放标签、国际多中心、III期、非劣效性试验评估低风险导管原位癌主动监测安全性的可行性——LORD研究
Eur J Cancer. 2015 Aug;51(12):1497-510. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2015.05.008. Epub 2015 May 26.