Lin Fuyong, Muhammad Musa Hassan, Mao Yufei, Zhao Fan, Wang Zixuan, Hong Yongcong, Cai Pumo, Guan Xiong, Huang Tianpei
State Key Laboratory of Agricultural and Forestry Biosecurity & Key Laboratory of Biopesticide and Chemical Biology of Ministry of Education & Biopesticide Research Center, College of Life Sciences, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou 350002, China.
College of Tea and Food Science, Wuyi University, Nanping 354300, China.
Insects. 2025 May 23;16(6):552. doi: 10.3390/insects16060552.
is a major pest of , with chemical pesticides being the primary method for pest control. However, their negative impact on crop growth and environmental risks have prompted the search for low-toxicity, environmentally friendly alternatives. This study systematically evaluates the control effectiveness of two commonly used chemical pesticides, Zu Jia and Jie Tiao, along with their impact on the growth characteristics of and compares them to the biopesticide (Bt) strain G033A. The control efficacy was assessed by measuring the insect population reduction rate and plant physiological indicators (weight, plant height, chlorophyll content, and root length). The differences between biopesticide and the two chemical pesticide treatments were analyzed. The results indicated that both Bt strain G033A and the chemical pesticides significantly controlled . However, chemical pesticides (Zu Jia and Jie Tiao) significantly reduced the chlorophyll content, plant height, and weight of ( < 0.05), whereas Bt strain G033A had no significant adverse effects on these plant traits ( > 0.05). The colonization characteristics of the Bt strain suggest potential for sustained pest control, while chemical pesticides exhibited rapid pest suppression effects. The findings highlight a novel IPM strategy that integrates the long-lasting efficacy of Bt biopesticides with the rapid action of chemical pesticides, offering a more sustainable and balanced approach to management in cultivation.
是一种主要害虫,化学农药是害虫防治的主要方法。然而,它们对作物生长的负面影响和环境风险促使人们寻找低毒、环保的替代品。本研究系统评估了两种常用化学农药“诅甲”和“捷条”的防治效果及其对生长特性的影响,并将它们与生物农药(Bt)菌株G033A进行比较。通过测量害虫种群减少率和植物生理指标(重量、株高、叶绿素含量和根长)来评估防治效果。分析了生物农药与两种化学农药处理之间的差异。结果表明,Bt菌株G033A和化学农药均能有效控制。然而,化学农药(诅甲和捷条)显著降低了的叶绿素含量、株高和重量(P<0.05),而Bt菌株G033A对这些植物性状没有显著不利影响(P>0.05)。Bt菌株的定殖特性表明其具有持续控制害虫的潜力,而化学农药表现出快速的害虫抑制效果。研究结果突出了一种新的综合虫害管理策略,该策略将Bt生物农药的长效性与化学农药的快速作用相结合,为种植中的害虫管理提供了一种更可持续、更平衡的方法。