Dunford Elizabeth K, Galligan Thomas M, Taillie Lindsey Smith, Musicus Aviva A
Department of Nutrition, Gillings Global School of Public Health, The University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina; Food Policy Division, The George Institute for Global Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Center for Science in the Public Interest, Washington, District of Columbia; Carolina Population Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
J Acad Nutr Diet. 2025 Jun 17. doi: 10.1016/j.jand.2025.05.007.
Research over the past 40 or more years has raised questions around the safety of synthetic food dyes approved for use in foods and beverages in the United States, especially in relation to impacts on neurobehavior in some children. Understanding the prevalence of synthetic dyes in US foods and beverages, especially those marketed to children, can help inform policy makers interested in taking legislative or regulatory action.
The objective of this study was to examine the use of synthetic dyes in US foods and beverages (overall and by category) sold by the top 25 US manufacturers in 2020 and to examine differences in the total sugar, sodium, and saturated fat content of products between those with and without synthetic dyes. The proportions of products in the top 5 categories marketed to children that contained synthetic dyes were compared with all remaining products.
This study was a cross-sectional analysis using ingredient data for all products from the top 25 manufacturers in the United States. Data were sourced from Label Insight (a NielsenIQ company) in 2021 (final sample, n = 39 763).
The number and proportion of products containing synthetic dyes were calculated. Products in the top 5 categories marketed to children were compared with all other product categories.
Mean levels of total sugar, sodium, and saturated fat for each category and company were calculated, and differences in nutrients between products with and without synthetic food dyes were examined using Student t test. P < .001 was considered significant.
Synthetic dyes were present in 19% of products, representing more than $46 billion in consumer purchases in 2020. The most common synthetic dye was Food, Drug and Cosmetic Red No. 40 (14% of products). The number of synthetic dyes per product ranged from 0 to 7, with 19% of foods containing 1 or more synthetic dyes. Twenty-eight percent of products in the top 5 categories marketed to children contained synthetic dyes compared with 11% in the remaining categories. Mean total sugar in products containing synthetic dyes was 141% higher (33.3 g/100 g) compared with products without synthetic dyes (13.8 g/100 g; P < .001). Products containing synthetic dyes had lower levels of sodium and saturated fat.
Foods and beverages containing synthetic dyes are widely prevalent in the US food supply, particularly in sweet foods and beverages, which are commonly marketed to children.
过去40多年的研究引发了人们对美国批准用于食品和饮料的合成食用色素安全性的质疑,尤其是其对一些儿童神经行为的影响。了解美国食品和饮料中,尤其是面向儿童销售的产品中合成色素的流行情况,有助于为有意采取立法或监管行动的政策制定者提供信息。
本研究的目的是调查2020年美国前25大制造商销售的食品和饮料(总体及按类别)中合成色素的使用情况,并比较含与不含合成色素的产品在总糖、钠和饱和脂肪含量上的差异。将面向儿童销售的前五大类产品中含合成色素的产品比例与所有其他产品进行比较。
本研究是一项横断面分析,使用了美国前25大制造商所有产品的成分数据。数据于2021年来自Label Insight(尼尔森IQ公司)(最终样本,n = 39763)。
计算含合成色素的产品数量和比例。将面向儿童销售的前五大类产品与所有其他产品类别进行比较。
计算每个类别和公司的总糖、钠和饱和脂肪的平均水平,并使用学生t检验检查含与不含合成食用色素的产品在营养素方面的差异。P < .001被认为具有统计学意义。
19%的产品含有合成色素,在2020年消费者购买量超过460亿美元。最常见的合成色素是食品、药品和化妆品红40号(占产品的14%)。每个产品中合成色素的数量从0到7不等,19%的食品含有1种或更多种合成色素。面向儿童销售的前五大类产品中,28%的产品含有合成色素,而其他类别中这一比例为11%。含合成色素的产品平均总糖含量比不含合成色素的产品高141%(33.3克/100克)(13.8克/100克;P < .001)。含合成色素的产品钠和饱和脂肪含量较低。
含合成色素的食品和饮料在美国食品供应中广泛存在,尤其是在通常面向儿童销售的甜食和饮料中。