Doyle Fosco Sebrina L, Schussler Deborah L
Human Development and Family Studies Department, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, 16802, USA.
Education Policy and Leadership Department, University at Albany, SUNY, Albany, NY, 12222, USA.
Prev Sci. 2025 Jul;26(5):827-838. doi: 10.1007/s11121-025-01819-6. Epub 2025 Jun 25.
School-based mindfulness programs (SBMPs) have shown a range of academic, emotional, and behavioral outcomes. However, heterogeneity in curricular content obscures accurate interpretation of results. To unpack the "black box" of SBMPs and better contextualize intervention outcomes, this investigation examined the practices, skills, and knowledge conveyed in twelve curricula. Required curricular elements (CEs) from the written curricula were coded for mindfulness practices and skills, and lessons were coded for mindfulness knowledge conveyed. Curricula had a different composition of components depending on theoretical foundation and program length. All curricula included intrapersonal (i.e., individual) practices, most often engaging somatic awareness. Interpersonal (i.e., relational) practices were identified in eight curricula and were infrequent, except in two programs that focused on kindness/compassion. All curricula cultivated intrapersonal skills of focused attention, emotion awareness, and emotion regulation at varying levels. Programs derived from MBSR cultivated the highest proportion of skills focused on awareness of mental states. Longer programs had a significantly higher proportion of CEs focused on interpersonal skills compared to shorter programs. Longer programs also had a higher proportion of lessons concentrated on focused attention and on empathy/perspective taking. Knowledge conveyed in lessons did not always correspond to the practices and skills coded, indicating students may be learning about topics even if they are not actively practicing or engaged in skill cultivation. This study offers clarity regarding the curricular content of SBMPs, making it possible to investigate links between active ingredients and program outcomes, refine theories of change, and better prepare teachers facilitating SBMPs.
基于学校的正念项目(SBMPs)已展现出一系列学业、情感和行为方面的成果。然而,课程内容的异质性使得对结果的准确解读变得模糊。为了揭开SBMPs的“黑匣子”并更好地理解干预结果的背景,本调查研究了十二种课程中所传授的实践、技能和知识。对书面课程中的必修课程要素(CEs)进行编码,以确定正念实践和技能,并对课程中所传授的正念知识进行编码。根据理论基础和课程时长,课程的组成部分各不相同。所有课程都包括个人内部(即个体)实践,最常见的是涉及身体感知。在八种课程中发现了人际(即关系)实践,且频率较低,除了两个专注于善良/同情的项目。所有课程都在不同程度上培养了专注注意力、情绪意识和情绪调节等个人内部技能。源自正念减压疗法(MBSR)的项目培养的专注于心理状态意识的技能比例最高。与较短的课程相比,较长的课程中专注于人际技能的课程要素比例显著更高。较长的课程中专注于专注注意力和同理心/换位思考的课程比例也更高。课程中所传授的知识并不总是与编码的实践和技能相对应,这表明即使学生没有积极实践或参与技能培养,他们也可能在学习相关主题。这项研究为SBMPs的课程内容提供了清晰的认识,使得研究有效成分与项目结果之间的联系、完善变革理论以及更好地培训实施SBMPs的教师成为可能。