Krummenacher Maryline, Tarvainen Mika, Montet Estelle, Turner Michelle C, Canu Irina Guseva
Department of Occupational and Environmental Health, Unisanté, University of Lausanne, Switzerland.
J Occup Environ Med. 2025 Jun 5;67(9):717-22. doi: 10.1097/JOM.0000000000003479.
To compare the Polar H10 and Bittium Faros™ HRV monitors for use in occupational and environmental health research, considering data collection, storage, transfer, resource needs, and limitations.
A literature review, device testing, and expert interviews were conducted to assess device performance and usability.
Polar H10 is affordable, records RR intervals for up to 20 hours offline, and requires a smartwatch and app for extended storage. Bittium Faros™ is a certified ECG monitor that records full waveforms, supports long measurements, and enables automatic data transfer. Both devices can be worn with a chest strap, but placement issues may affect data quality. Patch electrodes improve stability but may cause skin irritation.
This assessment highlights key device differences to guide HRV monitor selection for occupational and environmental epidemiological studies.
考虑数据收集、存储、传输、资源需求和局限性,比较用于职业与环境卫生研究的 Polar H10 和 Bittium Faros™ 心率变异性监测仪。
进行文献综述、设备测试和专家访谈,以评估设备性能和可用性。
Polar H10 价格实惠,可离线记录 RR 间期长达 20 小时,如需扩展存储则需要智能手表和应用程序。Bittium Faros™ 是一款经过认证的心电图监测仪,可记录完整波形,支持长时间测量,并能实现自动数据传输。两种设备都可搭配胸带佩戴,但放置问题可能会影响数据质量。贴片电极可提高稳定性,但可能会引起皮肤刺激。
本评估突出了关键设备差异,以指导职业与环境流行病学研究中 HRV 监测仪的选择。