Deniz Matheus, Sena Amanda Ribeiro, De-Sousa Karolini Tenffen, Vieira Frederico Márcio Corrêa, de Souza Estevam Rodrigues, Hötzel Maria José, Dittrich João Ricardo
Grupo de Estudos em Bovinos Leiteiros, Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia, Universidade Estadual Paulista, Botucatu 18618-681, São Paulo, Brazil.
Grupo de Estudos em Biometeorologia, Universidade Tecnológica Federal do Paraná, Dois Vizinhos 85660-000, Paraná, Brazil.
Animals (Basel). 2025 Jun 18;15(12):1791. doi: 10.3390/ani15121791.
The social category of dairy cows within a herd may influence their access to essential heat abatement resources. We evaluated how dominant, intermediate, and subordinate cows used shade and water in a silvopastoral system. Thirty-nine lactating Jersey cows were observed in a replicated study. Cows had unrestricted access to natural shade and a water trough. Microclimatic conditions and cow behaviors were recorded, and social rank was determined. Sunny areas promoted potential thermal discomfort for the cows, with higher heat load (on average 580.7 W/m) than shaded areas (on average 438.6 W/m). Intermediate (IRR: 2.07) and subordinate (IRR: 1.63) cows were more likely ( < 0.001) to visit the water trough than dominant cows. The odds of drinking water decreased by 13% ( < 0.001) for each hour that passed throughout the day. In contrast, the odds of using shaded areas increased by 7% ( < 0.001) for each increase in hour unit. Although all cows used the shaded areas at some point, they generally spent more time standing than lying down in the shade. Social category and hour influenced ( < 0.001) the behaviors in the shaded areas, with dominant cows more likely to engage in lying behaviors such as idling and rumination. In conclusion, our study demonstrated that cows' social category and thermal environment influenced the use of shade and drinking water. Although the overall pattern of resource use increased with rising thermal load, the proportion of use varied according to social category. Ensuring multiple or alternative resources may help meet the needs of cows across social ranks and improve thermal comfort during heat stress periods.
牛群中奶牛的社会类别可能会影响它们获取必要的防暑资源。我们评估了优势、中间和从属奶牛在林牧系统中对遮荫和水的使用情况。在一项重复研究中观察了39头泌乳期泽西奶牛。奶牛可以不受限制地使用自然遮荫和一个水槽。记录了微气候条件和奶牛行为,并确定了社会等级。阳光充足的区域会使奶牛面临潜在的热不适,其热负荷(平均580.7瓦/平方米)高于遮荫区域(平均438.6瓦/平方米)。中间等级(相对风险率:2.07)和从属等级(相对风险率:1.63)的奶牛比优势奶牛更有可能(P<0.001)去水槽饮水。一天中每过去一小时,饮水的几率就会降低13%(P<0.001)。相比之下,每增加一个小时单位,使用遮荫区域的几率就会增加7%(P<0.001)。尽管所有奶牛在某些时候都会使用遮荫区域,但它们通常在遮荫处站立的时间比躺卧的时间长。社会类别和时间影响(P<0.001)在遮荫区域的行为,优势奶牛更有可能进行躺卧行为,如闲逛和反刍。总之,我们的研究表明,奶牛的社会类别和热环境会影响遮荫和饮水的使用。尽管随着热负荷的增加,资源使用的总体模式有所增加,但使用比例因社会类别而异。确保有多种或替代资源可能有助于满足不同社会等级奶牛的需求,并在热应激期间提高热舒适度。