Petresin Tamara, Haines Jess, Battram Danielle S, Desgreniers Virginie, Regina Pena Mascorro Ivanna, Tugault-Lafleur Claire N
Department of Family Relations and Applied Nutrition, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON N1G 2W1, Canada.
Brescia School of Food and Nutritional Sciences, Western University, London, ON N6G 2V4, Canada.
Children (Basel). 2025 Jun 6;12(6):739. doi: 10.3390/children12060739.
The majority of Canadian children bring a home-packed lunch to school, and previous research suggests lunches are of poor nutritional quality. This pilot study aimed to test the feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary impact of an eHealth family-based intervention designed to improve the nutritional quality of home-packed lunches. : In this 12-week intervention, families (n = 20 parents with children aged 4-8 years) received a toolkit which included a cookbook on tips for preparing healthy lunches and 15 tested lunch box-friendly recipes, a lunch box, text messages, and an online cooking class. Feasibility was assessed via documentation of intervention delivery and participant retention rates. Acceptability was assessed via post-intervention surveys and semi-structured interviews in a sub-sample of parents (n = 9). Preliminary impact was assessed using 3-day lunch food records. Descriptive statistics were used to assess feasibility and acceptability, and Wilcoxon signed-rank tests were used to evaluate changes in the nutritional content of packed lunches. : Findings indicated a high retention rate (85%), and the majority (94%) of participants reported that the intervention was helpful and that they would recommend it to another parent. Qualitative interviews suggest parents found the recipes practical and diverse, the lunch box and the cooking class helpful, and some reported increased confidence and greater awareness of the foods being packed. No changes in the nutritional content of packed lunches were observed (n = 10 children). : In summary, a home-packed lunchbox intervention is feasible and well accepted by families, but further refinements are needed to optimize its impact before a full-scale trial.
大多数加拿大儿童会自带午餐去学校,此前的研究表明这些午餐的营养质量较差。这项试点研究旨在测试一项基于电子健康的家庭干预措施的可行性、可接受性及其对改善自带午餐营养质量的初步影响。在这项为期12周的干预措施中,家庭(20位有4至8岁孩子的家长)收到了一个工具包,其中包括一本关于准备健康午餐小贴士的食谱书以及15道经测试适合装在午餐盒中的食谱、一个午餐盒、短信和一门在线烹饪课程。通过记录干预措施的实施情况和参与者留存率来评估可行性。通过干预后的调查问卷以及对部分家长样本(9位)进行半结构化访谈来评估可接受性。使用3天的午餐食物记录来评估初步影响。描述性统计用于评估可行性和可接受性,威尔科克森符号秩检验用于评估自带午餐营养成分的变化。研究结果显示留存率很高(85%),大多数参与者(94%)表示该干预措施很有帮助,并且会向其他家长推荐。定性访谈表明家长们认为食谱实用且多样,午餐盒和烹饪课程很有帮助,一些家长还表示信心有所增强,对所装食物的认识也有所提高。未观察到自带午餐的营养成分有变化(10名儿童)。总之,自带午餐干预措施是可行的,并且受到家庭的广泛接受,但在进行全面试验之前,还需要进一步完善以优化其效果。