Kim Kang-Il, In Yong, Choi Hyung-Suk, Lee Ju-Hong, Sim Jae-Ang, Lee Han-Jun, Moon Young-Wan, Shon Oog-Jin, Seon Jong-Keun, Kim Young-Mo, Song Sang-Jun, Chang Chong-Bum, Han Hyuk-Soo
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Center for Joint Diseases and Rheumatism, Kyung Hee University Hospital at Gangdong, 892 Dongnam-ro, Gang-dong-gu, Seoul 05278, Republic of Korea.
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul 06591, Republic of Korea.
J Clin Med. 2025 Jun 19;14(12):4384. doi: 10.3390/jcm14124384.
: This Phase 3, randomised, double-blind, multicentre trial evaluated the efficacy and safety of a novel hyaluronic acid hydrogel cross-linked with hexamethylenediamine (HMDA-HA) compared to a conventional 1,4-butanediol diglycidyl ether cross-linked HA (BDDE-HA) in patients with mild-to-moderate knee osteoarthritis (OA). : A total of 223 adults (mean age 63.5 years; 167 women) with Kellgren-Lawrence (KL) grade I-III knee OA were randomised 1:1 to receive two intra-articular injections of HMDA-HA or BDDE-HA at baseline and at 24 weeks. The primary endpoint was changes from baseline in weight-bearing pain (WBP) on a 100 mm visual analogue scale (VAS) at Week 12, assessed in the per-protocol population. A non-inferiority margin of 10 mm was predefined. Secondary outcomes included global assessments, Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis (WOMAC) index scores, responder rates, and rescue medication use [ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT06307847]. : At Week 12, least squares mean change (standard error [SE]) in WBP was -23.72 (1.88) mm in the HMDA-HA group (n = 83) and -25.99 (1.76) mm in the BDDE-HA group (n = 95), yielding a difference of 2.26 mm (95% confidence interval [CI]: -2.83 to 7.34; = 0.3825), thus demonstrating the non-inferiority of HMDA-HA to BDDE-HA. Secondary outcomes were comparable between groups. A total of 136 adverse events were reported: 44 (41.1%) in the HMDA-HA group and 32 (28.1%) in the BDDE-HA group, with no treatment-related adverse drug reactions. : A single-injection intra-articular regimen of HMDA-HA was effective and safe for the treatment of adult patients with mild-to-moderate knee OA.
本3期随机双盲多中心试验评估了一种与六亚甲基二胺交联的新型透明质酸水凝胶(HMDA-HA)相较于传统的1,4-丁二醇二缩水甘油醚交联透明质酸(BDDE-HA)在轻至中度膝骨关节炎(OA)患者中的疗效和安全性。共有223名成人(平均年龄63.5岁;167名女性),Kellgren-Lawrence(KL)分级为I-III级膝OA,按1:1随机分组,在基线和24周时接受两次关节内注射HMDA-HA或BDDE-HA。主要终点是在第12周时,在意向性分析人群中,100毫米视觉模拟量表(VAS)上负重疼痛(WBP)相对于基线的变化。预先设定的非劣效界值为10毫米。次要结局包括总体评估、西安大略和麦克马斯特大学骨关节炎指数(WOMAC)评分、缓解率和急救药物使用情况[ClinicalTrials.gov:NCT06307847]。在第12周时,HMDA-HA组(n = 83)WBP的最小二乘均值变化(标准误[SE])为-23.72(1.88)毫米,BDDE-HA组(n = 95)为-25.99(1.76)毫米,差值为2.26毫米(95%置信区间[CI]:-2.83至7.34;P = 0.3825),从而证明HMDA-HA不劣于BDDE-HA。两组间次要结局具有可比性。共报告了136例不良事件:HMDA-HA组44例(41.1%),BDDE-HA组32例(28.1%),无治疗相关的药物不良反应。单次关节内注射HMDA-HA治疗轻至中度膝OA成年患者有效且安全。