Suppr超能文献

六种固相促甲状腺激素(TSH)试剂盒的评估。

An evaluation of six solid-phase thyrotropin (TSH) kits.

作者信息

Wood W G, Waller D, Hantke U

出版信息

J Clin Chem Clin Biochem. 1985 Aug;23(8):461-71. doi: 10.1515/cclm.1985.23.8.461.

Abstract

This article describes an objective evaluation of six thyrotropin (TSH) kits. One was a radioimmunoassay kit taken for comparison, three were immunoradiometric assays and one was an immunoenzymometric assay. The laboratory internal immunoluminometric assay for thyrotropin was used to measure the concentrations of thyrotropin in the kit standards using a standard curve of WHO 68/38 international reference preparation in serum from a thyrotoxic patient as matrix. The in-house assay was used to demonstrate the "sensitivity" to citrated plasma and the fact that kit standards could only measure "correctly" when used in its own kit. The study was carried out in a "blind" way, the assayist and organiser not knowing from which of the four groups under test (blood donors - serum and citrated plasma, thyroliberin-test and thyroid outpatient clinic patients) the samples came until the study had been completed. The immunometric assay kits were able to differentiate statistically between euthyroid and untreated hyperthyroid patients, although one IRMA kit (Kit F) had a large "grey zone" where both euthyroid and hyperthyroid patients overlapped. Compound precision profiles covering the range 0-5 mU/l thyrotropin were good, a mean coefficient of variation under 5% within the range 0.5-5 mU/l being demonstrated by 3 immunometric assays. The immunometric assay kit with the most cumbersome methodology showed, as was to be expected, the worst precision. The euthyroid ranges for thyrotropin were similar in 3 immunometric assay kits using the WHO 68/38 reference material as calibrator (Kits C and E, 0.25-3 mU/l) and correlated well with one kit using the 2nd IRP (NIBSC 80/558) as calibration material (Kit D 0.33-4 mU/l), although the results were around 30% higher in Kit D. The second kit (Kit A) using the 2nd IRP material as calibrator gave identical values with the kits using the WHO 68/38 reference thyrotropin-preparation for calibration purposes. In a further kit (Kit F) it was stated that both thyrotropin international reference preparations gave rise to identical serum values when used as calibrators. The thyroliberin-test may have an additional role to play in monitoring returning pituitary function in thyrotoxic patients under treatment as the immunometric assay kits were easily able to measure a thyrotropin difference of 0.5 mU/l in the range 0-1 mU/l. The conventional radioimmunoassay (Kit B) was unable to match the precision and sensitivity of the better immunometric assay kits in the range under 1 mU/1.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

摘要

本文描述了对六种促甲状腺激素(TSH)试剂盒的客观评估。其中一种是用于比较的放射免疫分析试剂盒,三种是免疫放射分析试剂盒,一种是免疫酶分析试剂盒。使用甲状腺毒症患者血清中WHO 68/38国际参考制剂的标准曲线作为基质,采用实验室内部促甲状腺激素免疫化学发光分析法测量试剂盒标准品中促甲状腺激素的浓度。内部分析用于证明对枸橼酸盐血浆的“敏感性”以及试剂盒标准品仅在其自身试剂盒中使用时才能“正确”测量的事实。该研究以“盲法”进行,在研究完成之前,分析人员和组织者不知道所测试的四组样本(献血者 - 血清和枸橼酸盐血浆、促甲状腺素释放激素试验和甲状腺门诊患者)中的样本来自哪一组。免疫分析试剂盒能够在统计学上区分甲状腺功能正常和未经治疗的甲状腺功能亢进患者,尽管一种免疫放射分析试剂盒(试剂盒F)有一个大的“灰色区域”,甲状腺功能正常和甲状腺功能亢进患者的结果有重叠。涵盖促甲状腺激素0 - 5 mU/l范围的复合精密度曲线良好,3种免疫分析方法在0.5 - 5 mU/l范围内的平均变异系数低于5%。方法最繁琐的免疫分析试剂盒显示出预期的最差精密度。使用WHO 68/38参考物质作为校准物的3种免疫分析试剂盒中促甲状腺激素的甲状腺功能正常范围相似(试剂盒C和E,0.25 - 3 mU/l),并且与一种使用第二种国际参考制剂(NIBSC 80/558)作为校准材料的试剂盒(试剂盒D,0.33 - 4 mU/l)相关性良好,尽管试剂盒D的结果高约30%。第二种使用第二种国际参考制剂材料作为校准物的试剂盒(试剂盒A)与使用WHO 68/38参考促甲状腺激素制剂进行校准的试剂盒给出相同的值。在另一种试剂盒(试剂盒F)中,据称两种促甲状腺激素国际参考制剂用作校准物时会产生相同的血清值。促甲状腺素释放激素试验在监测接受治疗的甲状腺毒症患者垂体功能恢复方面可能有额外作用,因为免疫分析试剂盒能够轻松测量0 - 1 mU/l范围内0.5 mU/l的促甲状腺激素差异。传统放射免疫分析(试剂盒B)在1 mU/1以下范围内无法与更好的免疫分析试剂盒的精密度和灵敏度相匹配。(摘要截取自400字)

相似文献

1
An evaluation of six solid-phase thyrotropin (TSH) kits.六种固相促甲状腺激素(TSH)试剂盒的评估。
J Clin Chem Clin Biochem. 1985 Aug;23(8):461-71. doi: 10.1515/cclm.1985.23.8.461.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验