Nguyen Kent, Yoo Kristy, Frediani Tanner, Lang Tracy, Shan John, Toy Brian, Xu Benjamin Y
Department of Ophthalmology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Clin Exp Optom. 2025 Jun 25:1-6. doi: 10.1080/08164622.2025.2515978.
Few studies have examined the utility of glaucoma referrals among young adults aged 18-40 years, as glaucoma is primarily a disease of the elderly. There are sparse data about prevalence of myopia, which may confound glaucoma diagnosis in this population.
To examine the prevalence and characteristics of primary open angle glaucoma (POAG) patients and suspects among young adults aged 18-39 years referred by optometry for in-office evaluation by glaucoma specialists.
Eligible participants who were referred for glaucoma evaluation between 1 January 2015 to 31 December 2019 were identified in the electronic medical record database. Study inclusion required glaucoma suspect diagnosis by optometry with subsequent referral and evaluation by a fellowship-trained glaucoma specialist. Diagnoses of glaucoma suspect and POAG by the glaucoma specialists were ascertained through International Classification of Diseases Tenth Revision codes and confirmed through manual chart review. Electronic medical record data were reviewed for age at time of referral, sex, cup-to-disc ratio, intraocular pressure (IOP), central corneal thickness, spherical equivalent refractive error, and family history of glaucoma. Ocular data from one eye of each included patient was selected at random and compared between glaucoma suspects and glaucoma patients.
Among 660 patients referred by optometrists for glaucoma evaluation, 151 (22.9%) followed up with referrals. Among evaluated patients, 6 (4.0%) were diagnosed with glaucoma. Glaucoma patients tended to have more severe myopia and higher cup-to-disc ratio compared to glaucoma suspects.
The utility of referring young adults for glaucoma evaluation was low in this patient population and practice setting, with only one out of 25 evaluations yielding a positive diagnosis and over 75% of referred patients failing to present for evaluation. Evidence-based methods to risk-stratify patients and establish standardised referral guidelines could be beneficial to ensure proper allocation of glaucoma care resources.
由于青光眼主要是一种老年疾病,很少有研究探讨18至40岁年轻成年人青光眼转诊的效用。关于近视患病率的数据稀少,这可能会混淆该人群的青光眼诊断。
为了研究验光转诊至青光眼专科医生进行门诊评估的18至39岁年轻成年人中原发性开角型青光眼(POAG)患者及疑似患者的患病率和特征。
在电子病历数据库中识别出2015年1月1日至2019年12月31日期间因青光眼评估而被转诊的符合条件的参与者。研究纳入要求验光诊断为青光眼疑似病例并随后由接受过专科培训的青光眼专家进行转诊和评估。青光眼专家对青光眼疑似病例和POAG的诊断通过国际疾病分类第十版编码确定,并通过手工病历审查进行确认。审查电子病历数据以获取转诊时的年龄、性别、杯盘比、眼压(IOP)、中央角膜厚度、等效球镜屈光不正和青光眼家族史。从每个纳入患者的一只眼中随机选择眼部数据,并在青光眼疑似患者和青光眼患者之间进行比较。
在验光师转诊进行青光眼评估的660名患者中,151名(22.9%)接受了转诊随访。在接受评估的患者中,6名(4.0%)被诊断为青光眼。与青光眼疑似患者相比,青光眼患者往往有更严重的近视和更高的杯盘比。
在该患者群体和实践环境中,转诊年轻成年人进行青光眼评估的效用较低,25次评估中只有1次得出阳性诊断,超过75%的转诊患者未前来评估。基于证据的患者风险分层方法和建立标准化转诊指南可能有助于确保青光眼护理资源的合理分配。