Fei-Zhang David J, Pan Eric, Gallant Jean-Nicolas, Bur Andrés M, Belcher Ryan H
Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine Chicago Illinois USA.
Medical College of Georgia - Augusta University Augusta Georgia USA.
Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol. 2025 Jun 24;10(3):e70186. doi: 10.1002/lio2.70186. eCollection 2025 Jun.
To assess the independent associations of poor food environment with differences in papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC) outcomes using the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA)-validated Food Environment Atlas (FEA).
This retrospective cohort study assessed patients from 2000 to 2017 for trends in overall and 3-year survival, and the number of tumors at diagnosis with increasing food environment vulnerability/FEA-scores by Cox hazards and logistic regression models stratified by race-ethnicity and age. FEA-scores were based on 282 county-level variables of food security, store-restaurant availability, SNAP/WIC enrollment, pricing, taxes, and producer vicinity while adjusting for traditional social determinant factors.
Among 148,296 patients, increased food environment vulnerability was associated with decreased overall survival (HR 1.06, 95% CI 1.04-1.07). These FEA effects were exacerbated among non-White patients (1.08, 1.05-1.11) compared to White patients (1.05, 1.04-1.07). Increased FEA was also associated with increased 3-year mortality (OR 1.05, 95% CI 1.03-1.07). These effects were exacerbated among non-White (1.06, 1.02-1.10) and older patients (1.05, 1.02-1.07). Increased food environment vulnerability was additionally associated with increased odds of having more than one primary tumor (1.02, 95% CI 1.01-1.03). When stratified separately for race and for age, worse food environment was associated with non-White patients (1.03, 1.01-1.06) and patients aged 45 years and older (1.02, 1.01-1.03).
Food environment vulnerability was associated with poorer prognosis after adjusting for traditional social determinant vulnerabilities, with varying magnitude upon stratification of race and age. Given PTC's rise in incidence and severity, the effects of food environment should be considered when informing future investigation and policy.
III.
利用美国农业部(USDA)验证的食品环境地图集(FEA)评估不良食品环境与甲状腺乳头状癌(PTC)预后差异之间的独立关联。
这项回顾性队列研究评估了2000年至2017年的患者的总体生存率和3年生存率趋势,以及通过按种族和年龄分层的Cox风险模型和逻辑回归模型,随着食品环境脆弱性/FEA评分增加,诊断时的肿瘤数量。FEA评分基于282个县级变量,包括粮食安全、商店-餐馆供应情况、补充营养援助计划/妇女、婴儿和儿童特别补充营养计划(SNAP/WIC)登记情况、定价、税收和生产者 proximity,同时调整传统社会决定因素。
在148296名患者中,食品环境脆弱性增加与总体生存率降低相关(风险比[HR]1.06,95%置信区间[CI]1.04-1.07)。与白人患者(1.05,1.04-1.07)相比,这些FEA效应在非白人患者中更为明显(1.08,1.05-1.11)。FEA增加也与3年死亡率增加相关(比值比[OR]1.05,95%CI 1.03-1.07)。这些效应在非白人(1.06,1.02-1.10)和老年患者(1.05,1.02-1.07)中更为明显。食品环境脆弱性增加还与有多个原发性肿瘤的几率增加相关(1.02,95%CI 1.01-1.03)。按种族和年龄分别分层时,较差的食品环境与非白人患者(1.03,1.01-1.06)和45岁及以上患者(1.02,1.01-1.03)相关。
在调整传统社会决定因素脆弱性后,食品环境脆弱性与较差的预后相关,在按种族和年龄分层时程度不同。鉴于PTC发病率和严重程度的上升,在为未来的调查和政策提供信息时应考虑食品环境的影响。
III级。