• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

超越:为盲人设计导航机器人的共享控制

Beyond : Designing Shared Control for Navigation Robots with Blind People.

作者信息

Kamikubo Rie, Kayukawa Seita, Kaniwa Yuka, Wang Allan, Kacorri Hernisa, Takagi Hironobu, Asakawa Chieko

机构信息

University of Maryland, College Park Maryland, United States IBM Research - Tokyo Tokyo, Japan.

IBM Research - Tokyo Tokyo, Japan.

出版信息

Proc SIGCHI Conf Hum Factor Comput Syst. 2025;2025. doi: 10.1145/3706598.3714112.

DOI:10.1145/3706598.3714112
PMID:40567540
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12188963/
Abstract

Autonomous navigation robots can increase the independence of blind people but often limit user control-following what is called in Japanese an "omakase" approach where decisions are left to the robot. This research investigates ways to enhance user control in social robot navigation, based on two studies conducted with blind participants. The first study, involving structured interviews (N=14), identified crowded spaces as key areas with significant social challenges. The second study (N=13) explored navigation tasks with an autonomous robot in these environments and identified design strategies across different modes of autonomy. Participants preferred an active role, termed the "boss" mode, where they managed crowd interactions, while the "monitor" mode helped them assess the environment, negotiate movements, and interact with the robot. These findings highlight the importance of shared control and user involvement for blind users, offering valuable insights for designing future social navigation robots.

摘要

自主导航机器人可以提高盲人的独立性,但通常会限制用户的控制权——这在日语中被称为“おまかせ”方式,即把决定权交给机器人。这项研究基于对盲人参与者进行的两项研究,探讨了增强社交机器人导航中用户控制权的方法。第一项研究包括结构化访谈(N = 14),将拥挤空间确定为存在重大社交挑战的关键区域。第二项研究(N = 13)在这些环境中使用自主机器人探索导航任务,并确定了不同自主模式下的设计策略。参与者更喜欢积极参与的角色,即所谓的“老板”模式,在这种模式下他们管理与人群的互动,而“监控”模式则帮助他们评估环境、协商行动以及与机器人互动。这些发现凸显了共享控制和用户参与对盲人用户的重要性,为未来社交导航机器人的设计提供了宝贵的见解。

相似文献

1
Beyond : Designing Shared Control for Navigation Robots with Blind People.超越:为盲人设计导航机器人的共享控制
Proc SIGCHI Conf Hum Factor Comput Syst. 2025;2025. doi: 10.1145/3706598.3714112.
2
Stigma Management Strategies of Autistic Social Media Users.自闭症社交媒体用户的污名管理策略
Autism Adulthood. 2025 May 28;7(3):273-282. doi: 10.1089/aut.2023.0095. eCollection 2025 Jun.
3
How lived experiences of illness trajectories, burdens of treatment, and social inequalities shape service user and caregiver participation in health and social care: a theory-informed qualitative evidence synthesis.疾病轨迹的生活经历、治疗负担和社会不平等如何影响服务使用者和照顾者参与健康和社会护理:一项基于理论的定性证据综合分析
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 Jun;13(24):1-120. doi: 10.3310/HGTQ8159.
4
Adapting Safety Plans for Autistic Adults with Involvement from the Autism Community.在自闭症群体的参与下为成年自闭症患者调整安全计划。
Autism Adulthood. 2025 May 28;7(3):293-302. doi: 10.1089/aut.2023.0124. eCollection 2025 Jun.
5
"Just Ask What Support We Need": Autistic Adults' Feedback on Social Skills Training.“只需询问我们需要什么支持”:成年自闭症患者对社交技能培训的反馈
Autism Adulthood. 2025 May 28;7(3):283-292. doi: 10.1089/aut.2023.0136. eCollection 2025 Jun.
6
What Matters Most? An Exploration of Quality of Life Through the Everyday Experiences of Autistic Young People and Adults.最重要的是什么?通过自闭症青少年和成年人的日常经历探索生活质量。
Autism Adulthood. 2025 May 28;7(3):312-323. doi: 10.1089/aut.2023.0127. eCollection 2025 Jun.
7
Understanding and Overcoming Negative Attitudes That Hinder Adoption of Reablement in Dementia Care: An Explorative Qualitative Study.理解并克服阻碍痴呆症护理中采用康复护理的消极态度:一项探索性定性研究
J Multidiscip Healthc. 2025 Jun 12;18:3411-3422. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S522515. eCollection 2025.
8
Shared decision-making interventions for people with mental health conditions.心理健康问题患者的共同决策干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Nov 11;11(11):CD007297. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007297.pub3.
9
Home treatment for mental health problems: a systematic review.心理健康问题的居家治疗:一项系统综述
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(15):1-139. doi: 10.3310/hta5150.
10
Survivor, family and professional experiences of psychosocial interventions for sexual abuse and violence: a qualitative evidence synthesis.性虐待和暴力的心理社会干预的幸存者、家庭和专业人员的经验:定性证据综合。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Oct 4;10(10):CD013648. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013648.pub2.

本文引用的文献

1
Understanding How Blind Users Handle Object Recognition Errors: Strategies and Challenges.了解视障用户如何处理物体识别错误:策略与挑战
ASSETS. 2024;2024:1-15. doi: 10.1145/3663548.3675635.
2
Automation-Induced Complacency Potential: Development and Validation of a New Scale.自动化引发的自满情绪潜力:一种新量表的开发与验证
Front Psychol. 2019 Feb 19;10:225. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00225. eCollection 2019.
3
What Is the Sense of Agency and Why Does it Matter?何为能动感?它为何重要?
Front Psychol. 2016 Aug 29;7:1272. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01272. eCollection 2016.
4
Active and passive spatial learning in human navigation: acquisition of graph knowledge.人类导航中的主动和被动空间学习:图形知识的获取。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2015 Jul;41(4):1162-1178. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000082. Epub 2014 Nov 24.
5
Spatial navigational strategies correlate with gray matter in the hippocampus of healthy older adults tested in a virtual maze.在虚拟迷宫中测试的健康老年人的空间导航策略与海马体中的灰质有关。
Front Aging Neurosci. 2013 Feb 20;5:1. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2013.00001. eCollection 2013.
6
Assisting the visually impaired: obstacle detection and warning system by acoustic feedback.辅助视障人士:基于声反馈的障碍物检测与预警系统。
Sensors (Basel). 2012 Dec 17;12(12):17476-96. doi: 10.3390/s121217476.
7
Active and passive contributions to spatial learning.主动和被动对空间学习的贡献。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2012 Feb;19(1):1-23. doi: 10.3758/s13423-011-0182-x.
8
Decision-making models in Japanese psychiatry: transitions from passive to active patterns.日本精神病学中的决策模型:从被动模式到主动模式的转变。
Soc Sci Med. 2004 Jul;59(1):83-91. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2003.10.006.