• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于个性的结对编程:在极小实体中实现内在动机匹配。

Personality-based pair programming: toward intrinsic motivation alignment in very small entities.

作者信息

Valovy Marcel, Buchalcevova Alena

机构信息

Department of Information Technology, University of Economics Prague, Prague, Czech Republic.

出版信息

PeerJ Comput Sci. 2025 Apr 1;11:e2774. doi: 10.7717/peerj-cs.2774. eCollection 2025.

DOI:10.7717/peerj-cs.2774
PMID:40567791
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12190715/
Abstract

AIM

This study explores whether personality-based role assignments (Pilot, Navigator, Solo) can raise intrinsic motivation in pair programming, focusing on designing a framework and process extension for the resource-constrained environment of very small entities (VSEs).

METHOD

We employed a mixed-methods design across three quasi-experimental datasets ( = 73 participants), applying linear mixed-effects (LME) modeling to assess motivational outcomes and thematically analyzing ( = 25) interviews for socio-psychological insights.

FINDINGS

Openness strongly correlates with Pilot roles; Extraversion & Agreeableness favor Navigator roles; and Neuroticism aligns more comfortably with Solo roles-each yielding substantial boosts in intrinsic motivation (up to 60-65%). Twelve qualitative themes underscore the influence of mentorship, pairing constellations, and flow disruptions on developer experiences.

IMPLICATIONS

Building on these results, we propose the role-optimization motivation alignment (ROMA) framework, mapped to the ISO/IEC 29110 Software Basic Profile and Agile Guidelines, with practical tasks (T1-T7) to facilitate systematic role-trait alignments in small agile teams. Although our data primarily involve Gen-Z undergraduates, the recurring patterns suggest broader applicability, further supported by a separately published application for ongoing generalizability.

CONCLUSION

Personality-driven role optimization may significantly enhance collaboration and developer satisfaction in VSEs, though further studies in professional settings and investigations into AI-assisted or distributed pair programming are warranted.

摘要

目的

本研究探讨基于个性的角色分配(飞行员、导航员、单独工作者)能否提高结对编程中的内在动机,重点是为超小型实体(VSE)资源受限的环境设计一个框架和流程扩展。

方法

我们在三个准实验数据集(n = 73名参与者)上采用了混合方法设计,应用线性混合效应(LME)模型来评估动机结果,并对25次访谈进行主题分析以获得社会心理见解。

结果

开放性与飞行员角色密切相关;外向性和宜人性有利于导航员角色;神经质与单独工作者角色更匹配——每种情况都能大幅提高内在动机(高达60 - 65%)。十二个定性主题强调了指导、结对组合和流程中断对开发者体验的影响。

启示

基于这些结果,我们提出了角色优化动机匹配(ROMA)框架,该框架映射到ISO/IEC 29110软件基本概况和敏捷指南,并配有实际任务(T1 - T7),以促进小型敏捷团队中系统的角色 - 特质匹配。尽管我们的数据主要涉及Z世代本科生,但反复出现的模式表明其具有更广泛的适用性,另一篇单独发表的关于持续可推广性的应用文章进一步支持了这一点。

结论

个性驱动的角色优化可能会显著提高VSE中的协作和开发者满意度,不过仍需在专业环境中进行进一步研究,并对人工智能辅助或分布式结对编程进行调查。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9c28/12190715/a7752a3bfcc7/peerj-cs-11-2774-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9c28/12190715/a7752a3bfcc7/peerj-cs-11-2774-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9c28/12190715/a7752a3bfcc7/peerj-cs-11-2774-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Personality-based pair programming: toward intrinsic motivation alignment in very small entities.基于个性的结对编程:在极小实体中实现内在动机匹配。
PeerJ Comput Sci. 2025 Apr 1;11:e2774. doi: 10.7717/peerj-cs.2774. eCollection 2025.
2
Accreditation through the eyes of nurse managers: an infinite staircase or a phenomenon that evaporates like water.护士长眼中的认证:是无尽的阶梯还是如流水般消逝的现象。
J Health Organ Manag. 2025 Jun 30. doi: 10.1108/JHOM-01-2025-0029.
3
Monitoring strategies for clinical intervention studies.临床干预研究的监测策略。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Dec 8;12(12):MR000051. doi: 10.1002/14651858.MR000051.pub2.
4
Perceptions and experiences of the prevention, detection, and management of postpartum haemorrhage: a qualitative evidence synthesis.预防、检测和管理产后出血的认知和经验:定性证据综合。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Nov 27;11(11):CD013795. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013795.pub2.
5
Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.医疗专业人员在急症医院环境中团队合作教育的经验:对定性文献的系统综述
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):96-137. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-1843.
6
Faculty development initiatives designed to promote leadership in medical education. A BEME systematic review: BEME Guide No. 19.旨在促进医学教育领导力的教师发展计划。BEME 系统评价:BEME 指南第 19 号。
Med Teach. 2012;34(6):483-503. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2012.680937.
7
Measures implemented in the school setting to contain the COVID-19 pandemic.学校为控制 COVID-19 疫情而采取的措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Jan 17;1(1):CD015029. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015029.
8
Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of computer and other electronic aids for smoking cessation: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.计算机和其他电子戒烟辅助手段的有效性和成本效益:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
Health Technol Assess. 2012;16(38):1-205, iii-v. doi: 10.3310/hta16380.
9
Shared decision-making interventions for people with mental health conditions.心理健康问题患者的共同决策干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Nov 11;11(11):CD007297. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007297.pub3.
10
Psychological therapies for panic disorder with or without agoraphobia in adults: a network meta-analysis.成人伴或不伴有广场恐惧症的惊恐障碍的心理治疗:一项网状荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Apr 13;4(4):CD011004. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011004.pub2.

本文引用的文献

1
K-Alpha Calculator-Krippendorff's Alpha Calculator: A user-friendly tool for computing Krippendorff's Alpha inter-rater reliability coefficient.K值阿尔法计算器 - 克里彭多夫阿尔法计算器:一款用于计算克里彭多夫阿尔法评分者间信度系数的用户友好型工具。
MethodsX. 2024 Jan 6;12:102545. doi: 10.1016/j.mex.2023.102545. eCollection 2024 Jun.
2
From needs to goals and representations: Foundations for a unified theory of motivation, personality, and development.从需要到目标再到表现:动机、个性和发展的统一理论基础。
Psychol Rev. 2017 Nov;124(6):689-719. doi: 10.1037/rev0000082. Epub 2017 Sep 21.
3
The Emerging Neuroscience of Intrinsic Motivation: A New Frontier in Self-Determination Research.
内在动机的新兴神经科学:自我决定研究的新前沿。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2017 Mar 24;11:145. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2017.00145. eCollection 2017.
4
Happy software developers solve problems better: psychological measurements in empirical software engineering.快乐的软件开发人员能更好地解决问题:实证软件工程中的心理测量。
PeerJ. 2014 Mar 11;2:e289. doi: 10.7717/peerj.289. eCollection 2014.
5
The evolution of personality variation in humans and other animals.人类及其他动物个性变异的演变。
Am Psychol. 2006 Sep;61(6):622-31. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.61.6.622.
6
Personality and job performance: test of the mediating effects of motivation among sales representatives.个性与工作绩效:销售代表动机中介效应的检验
J Appl Psychol. 2002 Feb;87(1):43-51. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.87.1.43.
7
Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being.自我决定理论与内在动机、社会发展和幸福感的促进
Am Psychol. 2000 Jan;55(1):68-78. doi: 10.1037//0003-066x.55.1.68.