Twiringirimana François Régis, Kanazayire Clémentine, Vandyke Okyere Bright, Kanzunguze Andrew, Rutayisire Reverien, Ogbona Grace
School of Health Sciences, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Rwanda, Kigali, Rwanda.
School of Nursing and Midwifery, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Rwanda, Kigali, Rwanda.
Rwanda J Med Health Sci. 2023 Jul 31;6(2):184-190. doi: 10.4314/rjmhs.v6i2.9. eCollection 2023 Jul.
The Goldmann Applanation Tonometer (GAT) is accepted as the gold standard tool to measure Intraocular Pressure (IOP). Besides, there is an emerging Icare Rebound Tonometer (RBT) which can be an alternative in terms of measuring IOP.
This research aimed to analyze the agreement, and repeatability of intraocular pressure (IOP) measurements and compare the outcomes of RBT and GAT among Mzuzu University Students in Malawi.
For this cross-sectional study, 107 participants aged 18 to 29 years underwent ophthalmic examination with three IOP measurements taken by two examiners using the RBT and the GAT.
The RBT and GAT were found to have a strong correlation (r=0.809, p>0.001), with an intra-class correlation of 0.787 (p>0.001). The mean difference of IOP measured by the two machines was 1.99±1.05mmHg, which was statistically significant. However, according to Bland-Altman analysis, there was no agreement between the results given by the two machines, with a bias of -1.979 (CI -2.28, -1.68, p > 0.001). In terms of repeatability, GAT was found to be better than RBT, with a CR of 7.512 and 10.418 respectively.
The RBT and GAT can offer comparable IOP measures. Therefore, RBT can be recommended for community outreach programs where GAT cannot be employed.
Goldmann压平眼压计(GAT)被公认为测量眼压(IOP)的金标准工具。此外,一种新兴的Icare回弹眼压计(RBT)在测量眼压方面可作为一种替代工具。
本研究旨在分析眼压测量的一致性和可重复性,并比较马拉维姆祖祖大学学生中RBT和GAT的测量结果。
在这项横断面研究中,107名年龄在18至29岁之间的参与者接受了眼科检查,由两名检查人员使用RBT和GAT进行三次眼压测量。
发现RBT和GAT具有很强的相关性(r=0.809,p>0.001),组内相关性为0.787(p>0.001)。两台机器测量的眼压平均差异为1.99±1.05mmHg,具有统计学意义。然而,根据Bland-Altman分析,两台机器给出的结果之间没有一致性,偏差为-1.979(CI -2.28,-1.68,p>0.001)。在可重复性方面,发现GAT比RBT更好,其CR分别为7.512和10.418。
RBT和GAT可以提供可比的眼压测量值。因此,对于无法使用GAT的社区外展项目,推荐使用RBT。