• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[处于需要长期护理的临界点——巴伐利亚州有和没有护理级别建议的老年人的比较]

[On the threshold of needing long-term care-Comparison of older people with and without a care level recommendation in Bavaria].

作者信息

Schütz Johanna, Wetzel Lorena Denise

机构信息

Bayerisches Zentrum Pflege Digital, Hochschule für angewandte Wissenschaften Kempten, Albert-Einstein-Straße 6, 87437, Kempten, Deutschland.

出版信息

Z Gerontol Geriatr. 2025 Jun 26. doi: 10.1007/s00391-025-02457-x.

DOI:10.1007/s00391-025-02457-x
PMID:40569422
Abstract

BACKGROUND

People who have not received a care level ("Pflegegrad", PG) in care assessments in accordance with § 14 Social Code (SGB) XI have hardly been addressed by research to date, even though information on this group has enormous preventative potential. This article aims to compare older people with and without PG recommendations in terms of sociodemographic characteristics, independence in various areas of life as well as medical diagnoses.

METHODS

The analysis is based on n = 122,478 initial care assessments of adults over the age of 50 years, which were carried out by the Bavarian Medical Service (MD) in 2019. Descriptive analyses are used to compare people with and without PG recommendations.

RESULTS

Of those assessed, 19.5% were not given a PG recommendation. These people are younger, more often female and living alone than people with PG recommendation. Overall, those assessed without PG recommendation are less restricted in their independence than those with a PG recommendation. Nevertheless, they also have significant limitations in activities relevant to everyday life (especially in mobility outside the home, shopping, cleaning the home). In both groups, a limitation of gait and mobility is the most common diagnosis that leads to an application for a care assessment.

CONCLUSION

Routine data from long-term care assessments provide information about older people who are on the threshold of needing long-term care. People without PG recommendation who nevertheless require support therefore represent an important target group for support measures and should be addressed by preventive and health-promoting interventions.

摘要

背景

根据德国社会法典(SGB)第十一章第14条进行的护理评估中,未获得护理等级(“Pflegegrad”,PG)的人群迄今几乎未受到研究关注,尽管有关该群体的信息具有巨大的预防潜力。本文旨在比较有和没有PG建议的老年人在社会人口学特征、生活各方面的独立性以及医学诊断方面的情况。

方法

分析基于巴伐利亚医疗服务机构(MD)在2019年对122478名50岁以上成年人进行的首次护理评估。采用描述性分析比较有和没有PG建议的人群。

结果

在接受评估的人群中,19.5%未获得PG建议。这些人比有PG建议的人更年轻,女性更多,且独居。总体而言,未获得PG建议的被评估者在独立性方面受到的限制比有PG建议的人少。然而,他们在与日常生活相关的活动中也存在显著限制(尤其是在家外出行、购物、打扫房屋方面)。在两组中,步态和行动能力受限是导致申请护理评估的最常见诊断。

结论

长期护理评估的常规数据提供了有关处于需要长期护理边缘的老年人的信息。因此,那些没有PG建议但仍需要支持的人是支持措施的重要目标群体,应通过预防性和促进健康的干预措施加以关注。

相似文献

1
[On the threshold of needing long-term care-Comparison of older people with and without a care level recommendation in Bavaria].[处于需要长期护理的临界点——巴伐利亚州有和没有护理级别建议的老年人的比较]
Z Gerontol Geriatr. 2025 Jun 26. doi: 10.1007/s00391-025-02457-x.
2
Signs and symptoms to determine if a patient presenting in primary care or hospital outpatient settings has COVID-19.在基层医疗机构或医院门诊环境中,如果患者出现以下症状和体征,可判断其是否患有 COVID-19。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 May 20;5(5):CD013665. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013665.pub3.
3
A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of paclitaxel, docetaxel, gemcitabine and vinorelbine in non-small-cell lung cancer.对紫杉醇、多西他赛、吉西他滨和长春瑞滨在非小细胞肺癌中的临床疗效和成本效益进行的快速系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(32):1-195. doi: 10.3310/hta5320.
4
Home treatment for mental health problems: a systematic review.心理健康问题的居家治疗:一项系统综述
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(15):1-139. doi: 10.3310/hta5150.
5
Systemic treatments for metastatic cutaneous melanoma.转移性皮肤黑色素瘤的全身治疗
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Feb 6;2(2):CD011123. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011123.pub2.
6
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.系统性药理学治疗慢性斑块状银屑病:网络荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Apr 19;4(4):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub4.
7
Behavioral interventions to reduce risk for sexual transmission of HIV among men who have sex with men.降低男男性行为者中艾滋病毒性传播风险的行为干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008 Jul 16(3):CD001230. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001230.pub2.
8
Antidepressants for pain management in adults with chronic pain: a network meta-analysis.抗抑郁药治疗成人慢性疼痛的疼痛管理:一项网络荟萃分析。
Health Technol Assess. 2024 Oct;28(62):1-155. doi: 10.3310/MKRT2948.
9
How lived experiences of illness trajectories, burdens of treatment, and social inequalities shape service user and caregiver participation in health and social care: a theory-informed qualitative evidence synthesis.疾病轨迹的生活经历、治疗负担和社会不平等如何影响服务使用者和照顾者参与健康和社会护理:一项基于理论的定性证据综合分析
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 Jun;13(24):1-120. doi: 10.3310/HGTQ8159.
10
Interventions for interpersonal communication about end of life care between health practitioners and affected people.干预健康从业者与受影响者之间关于临终关怀的人际沟通。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Jul 8;7(7):CD013116. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013116.pub2.

本文引用的文献

1
[How has life expectancy without functional limitations developed in Germany? An analysis with data from the German Ageing Survey (DEAS)].德国无功能限制的预期寿命是如何发展的?基于德国老龄化调查(DEAS)数据的分析
Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2024 May;67(5):564-571. doi: 10.1007/s00103-024-03875-9. Epub 2024 Apr 22.
2
[Preventing the need for long-term care : Analyses of assessment data from the medical service].[预防长期护理需求:医疗服务评估数据分析]
Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2023 May;66(5):490-497. doi: 10.1007/s00103-023-03685-5. Epub 2023 Mar 21.
3
Care Dependency Factors–Analyses of Assessment Data from the Medical Service of German Statutory Health Insurance Providers.
护理依赖因素——德国法定健康保险机构医疗服务评估数据的分析
Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2021 Aug 23;118(33-34):563-564. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.m2021.0263.