Coghlan M Kaitlyn, Cojocaru Liviu, Alton Suzanne, Pahlavan Autusa, Trilling Ariel, Seung Hyunuk, Kodali Bhavani, Crimmins Sarah, Goetzinger Katherine
Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA.
Int Urol Nephrol. 2025 Jun 26. doi: 10.1007/s11255-025-04610-2.
Postoperative urinary retention (POUR) remains a common concern associated with cesarean delivery (CD). Recently, efforts have been made to expedite recovery after CD through Enhanced Recovery After Cesarean (ERAC) pathways. We aimed to evaluate whether the implementation of an ERAC protocol impacts the incidence of POUR after CD.
This is a secondary analysis of a prospective, longitudinal, quality improvement (QI) study of patients undergoing CD before and after implementation of an ERAC protocol. CD patients requiring general anesthesia, significantly complicated CD, and patients with chronic pain disorders were excluded. The primary outcome was POUR, defined as failure of spontaneous voiding 6 hours (h) after Foley catheter removal. Secondary outcomes were the duration of Foley catheter placement and replacement of Foley catheter.
Three hundred-eight patients were included. The incidence of POUR was similar between groups pre-ERAC (44, 22.6%) vs post-ERAC (36, 31.8%), p = 0.08. Time to Foley removal following CD was significantly decreased in the post-ERAC cohort [10.1 h (7.2, 13.7) vs. 12.5 h (10.9, 17.8)] (p < 0.001). Need for Foley catheter replacement occurred at a similar rate (pre-ERAC: 1.0%; post-ERAC: 0.9%, p = 0.7).
There was no significant difference in POUR after implementing an ERAC protocol, although a trend toward increased incidence was noted. Post-ERAC implementation resulted in a significant decrease in the duration of Foley catheter placement.
术后尿潴留(POUR)仍然是剖宫产(CD)相关的常见问题。最近,人们通过剖宫产术后加速康复(ERAC)途径努力加快剖宫产术后的恢复。我们旨在评估ERAC方案的实施是否会影响剖宫产术后POUR的发生率。
这是一项对实施ERAC方案前后接受剖宫产患者的前瞻性、纵向、质量改进(QI)研究的二次分析。排除需要全身麻醉的剖宫产患者、严重复杂的剖宫产患者以及患有慢性疼痛疾病的患者。主要结局是POUR,定义为拔除Foley导尿管后6小时(h)内不能自主排尿。次要结局是Foley导尿管留置时间和更换Foley导尿管情况。
共纳入308例患者。ERAC前组(44例,22.6%)与ERAC后组(36例,31.8%)的POUR发生率相似,p = 0.08。ERAC后队列剖宫产术后拔除Foley导尿管的时间显著缩短[10.1小时(7.2,13.7)对12.5小时(10.9,17.8)](p < 0.001)。Foley导尿管更换需求发生率相似(ERAC前:1.0%;ERAC后:0.9%,p = 0.7)。
实施ERAC方案后POUR无显著差异,尽管有发生率增加的趋势。ERAC方案实施后Foley导尿管留置时间显著缩短。