Reigosa-Crespo Vivian, Ponce de León Patricia, Herrero Ainara, Cuadro Ariel
Department of Neuroscience and Learning, Faculty of Health Sciences, Catholic University of Uruguay.
Stella Maris College.
Can J Exp Psychol. 2025 Jun;79(2):146-154. doi: 10.1037/cep0000354. Epub 2024 Dec 30.
Word problem-solving (WPS) in mathematics and reading comprehension (RC) are essential to academic literacy. Previous studies suggest that WPS and RC involve common processes related to number and word processing. However, the nature of these connections is not yet fully understood. In this study, we examined the influence of reading and calculation fluency on the development of WPS and RC by conducting two longitudinal studies (L1 and L2) with children entering first grade in 2019 and 2018, respectively. Significant associations were found between reading fluency and RC, as well as between addition and subtraction fluency and WPS. In general, those correlations were higher (L1: .60-.74; L2: .55-.82) than correlations between reading and mathematics measures (L1: .30-.57; L2: .34-.54) suggesting patterns of overlap between different underlying more specific processes. Hierarchical regressions were computed to test the unique contribution of each predictor to the variance in WPS and RC when the other predictors were controlled. Addition and subtraction fluency significantly explained 6% and 4% of the individual variability in WPS in L1. Addition fluency also explained 20% of the variance in WPS in L2, whereas subtraction fluency did not. Moreover, reading fluency did not show a unique contribution to individual variability in WPS. On the contrary, reading fluency contributed uniquely to variance in RC in L1 (16%) and L2 (17%), while addition and subtraction fluency did not. Considering these findings, the controversy over the specificity of learning disabilities in mathematics and reading is revised, and practical implications are discussed. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).
数学中的文字问题解决(WPS)和阅读理解(RC)对学术素养至关重要。先前的研究表明,WPS和RC涉及与数字和文字处理相关的共同过程。然而,这些联系的本质尚未完全明了。在本研究中,我们通过分别对2019年和2018年进入一年级的儿童进行两项纵向研究(L1和L2),考察了阅读流畅性和计算流畅性对WPS和RC发展的影响。结果发现阅读流畅性与RC之间、加减法流畅性与WPS之间存在显著关联。总体而言,这些相关性(L1:.60-.74;L2:.55-.82)高于阅读与数学测量之间的相关性(L1:.30-.57;L2:.34-.54),表明不同的潜在更具体过程之间存在重叠模式。我们进行了分层回归分析,以检验在控制其他预测变量时,每个预测变量对WPS和RC方差的独特贡献。在L1中,加减法流畅性分别显著解释了WPS中个体变异性的6%和4%。加法流畅性在L2中也解释了WPS中20%的方差,而减法流畅性则没有。此外,阅读流畅性对WPS中的个体变异性没有独特贡献。相反,阅读流畅性在L1(16%)和L2(17%)中对RC的方差有独特贡献,而加减法流畅性则没有。基于这些发现,对数学和阅读学习障碍特异性的争议进行了修正,并讨论了实际意义。(PsycInfo数据库记录(c)2025美国心理学会,保留所有权利)