Casado-Martín Lorena, Hernández Marta, Eiros José M, Valero Antonio, Rodríguez-Lázaro David
Microbiology Area, University of Burgos, Plaza Misael Bañuelos s/n, 09001 Burgos, Spain.
Centre for Emerging Pathogens and Global Health, University of Burgos, Plaza Misael Bañuelos s/n, 09001 Burgos, Spain.
Microorganisms. 2025 May 23;13(6):1186. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms13061186.
Wastewater-based molecular epidemiology enables the surveillance of both symptomatic and asymptomatic individuals in a non-invasive, cost-effective, rapid, and early-detection manner. The use of wastewater analysis to monitor the prevalence of viral pathogens in a given population has increased significantly since the COVID-19 pandemic. These studies typically involve three main steps: viral concentration, nucleic acid extraction, and DNA/RNA quantification. However, the absence of a standardized methodology remains a major limitation, hindering result comparability across studies. Among the available viral concentration techniques, aluminum-based adsorption-precipitation is one of the most commonly used due to its simplicity, efficiency, and low cost. This study evaluates the robustness and variability of the viral concentration and nucleic acid extraction steps by implementing different process controls in wastewater samples across 122 independent experiments. Additionally, correlations between viral recovery efficiencies and relevant physicochemical parameters were also analyzed ( = 600). The results indicate that, despite the overall robustness of the method, the concentration step exhibits the highest variability (CV = 53.82%), which accounted for 53.73% of the overall variability. In addition, our results show that, on average, 0.65 logarithmic units were lost during the viral concentration step. Furthermore, viral recovery rates were influenced by seasonality and sample characteristics, while no significant correlation was observed with pH or conductivity. These findings highlight the importance of process controls, confirming the robustness of the methodology, and identifying key parameters that should be considered in future studies for improved data interpretation.
基于废水的分子流行病学能够以非侵入性、经济高效、快速且早期检测的方式对有症状和无症状个体进行监测。自新冠疫情以来,利用废水分析来监测特定人群中病毒病原体的流行情况显著增加。这些研究通常涉及三个主要步骤:病毒浓缩、核酸提取和DNA/RNA定量。然而,缺乏标准化方法仍然是一个主要限制,阻碍了不同研究结果的可比性。在现有的病毒浓缩技术中,基于铝的吸附沉淀法因其简单、高效和低成本而成为最常用的方法之一。本研究通过在122个独立实验的废水样本中实施不同的过程控制,评估了病毒浓缩和核酸提取步骤的稳健性和变异性。此外,还分析了病毒回收效率与相关理化参数之间的相关性(n = 600)。结果表明,尽管该方法总体上具有稳健性,但浓缩步骤的变异性最高(CV = 53.82%),占总变异性的53.73%。此外,我们的结果表明,在病毒浓缩步骤中平均损失了0.65个对数单位。此外,病毒回收率受季节性和样本特征的影响,而与pH值或电导率未观察到显著相关性。这些发现突出了过程控制的重要性,证实了该方法的稳健性,并确定了未来研究中为改进数据解释应考虑的关键参数。