van Draanen Jenna, Hayashi Kanna, Milloy M-J, Nosova Ekaterina, Shulha Hennady, Grant Cameron, Richardson Lindsey
Department of Sociology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
British Columbia Centre on Substance Use, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Soc Indic Res. 2021 Sep;157(2):501-521. doi: 10.1007/s11205-021-02663-1. Epub 2021 Mar 14.
Poverty and socioeconomic status (SES) are conventionally measured through indicators of income, wealth, education and/or occupation, but for some populations such as people who use drugs (PWUD), these measures may not sufficiently capture material well-being. This paper examines the reliability and validity of material security, measured through a modified Family Resource Scale (FRS) as an alternative measure of poverty, comparing this to other measures in the context of exposure to violence among PWUD using multivariable generalized estimating equations. The FRS demonstrated good reliability (α=0.83) as well as content, criterion, and construct validity. Three factors were detected within the FRS representing access to housing, economic resources, and basic needs and services. In contrast to other SES measures that had no or positive relationships with exposure to violence, higher FRS scores were associated with lower odds of exposure to violence in final analyses. The FRS thus adds an important perspective to the measurement of poverty, with potential relevance to other populations.
贫困和社会经济地位(SES)通常通过收入、财富、教育和/或职业指标来衡量,但对于一些人群,如吸毒者(PWUD),这些指标可能无法充分反映其物质福祉。本文通过修正的家庭资源量表(FRS)来衡量物质保障的可靠性和有效性,以此作为贫困的替代衡量指标,并在吸毒者遭受暴力侵害的背景下,使用多变量广义估计方程将其与其他指标进行比较。FRS显示出良好的可靠性(α=0.83)以及内容效度、标准效度和结构效度。在FRS中检测到三个因素,分别代表住房获取、经济资源以及基本需求和服务。与其他与遭受暴力侵害无关联或呈正相关的SES指标不同,在最终分析中,较高的FRS得分与较低的遭受暴力侵害几率相关。因此,FRS为贫困衡量增加了一个重要视角,可能与其他人群相关。