Guan Song, Wang Yu, Liu Qing, Yan Meng, Ren Kai, Wang Jun, Bi Nan, Zhao Lujun
Department of Radiation Oncology, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute & Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Key Laboratory of Cancer Immunology and Biotherapy, Tianjin, China.
Department of Radiation Oncology, Beijing Tuberculosis and Thoracic Tumor Research Institute/Beijing Chest Hospital, Cancer Research Center, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Front Immunol. 2025 Jun 12;16:1591134. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2025.1591134. eCollection 2025.
Consolidation immunotherapy after chemoradiotherapy (CRT) is the standard of care for unresectable stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, the role of upfront chemoimmunotherapy before CRT remains unclear. This study aims to investigate the value of induction chemoimmunotherapy before CRT in unresectable stage III NSCLC.
Unresectable stage III NSCLC patients who received induction chemoimmunotherapy before CRT or consolidation immunotherapy after CRT from four centers were retrospectively enrolled. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS), and one-to-one propensity score matching (PSM) was used to further minimize confounding.
A total of 262 patients were enrolled, with 124 (47.3%) receiving induction chemoimmunotherapy (Ind group) and 138 (52.7%) receiving consolidation immunotherapy (Con group). Further 1:1 PSM analysis showed that induction chemoimmunotherapy achieved comparable outcomes to consolidation immunotherapy (2-year PFS: 56.0% vs. 45.6%, P=0.327; 2-year OS: 81.0% vs. 79.2%, P=0.960) with fewer cycles of immunotherapy (median 4 vs. 10 cycles, P<0.001). The incidence of treatment-related adverse events was similar (P>0.05). Exploratory analysis found that patients with < 4 cycles of induction immunotherapy had similar PFS (median NR vs. 30.1 months, 2-year PFS 50.8% vs. 54.4%, P=0.932) but prolonged OS (median NR vs. 46.0 months, 2-year OS 89.0% vs. 75.5%, P=0.112) compared to those with ≥ 4 cycles of induction immunotherapy.
Upfront chemoimmunotherapy before CRT appears to be feasible and safe, and may achieve non-inferior outcomes to consolidation immunotherapy with fewer cycles of immunotherapy.
放化疗(CRT)后巩固性免疫治疗是不可切除的III期非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)的标准治疗方案。然而,CRT前先行化疗免疫治疗的作用仍不明确。本研究旨在探讨CRT前诱导化疗免疫治疗在不可切除的III期NSCLC中的价值。
回顾性纳入来自四个中心的在CRT前接受诱导化疗免疫治疗或CRT后巩固性免疫治疗的不可切除III期NSCLC患者。采用Kaplan-Meier法估计无进展生存期(PFS)和总生存期(OS),并采用一对一倾向评分匹配(PSM)进一步减少混杂因素。
共纳入262例患者,其中124例(47.3%)接受诱导化疗免疫治疗(诱导组),138例(52.7%)接受巩固性免疫治疗(巩固组)。进一步的1:1 PSM分析显示,诱导化疗免疫治疗与巩固性免疫治疗取得了相当的结果(2年PFS:56.0%对45.6%,P = 0.327;2年OS:81.0%对79.2%,P = 0.960),且免疫治疗周期更少(中位4个周期对中位10个周期,P < 0.001)。治疗相关不良事件的发生率相似(P > 0.05)。探索性分析发现,诱导免疫治疗周期< 4个周期的患者与诱导免疫治疗周期≥ 个周期的患者相比,PFS相似(中位未达到对30.1个月,2年PFS 50.8%对54.4%,P = 0.932),但OS延长(中位未达到对46.0个月,2年OS 89.0%对75.5%,P = 0.112)。
CRT前先行化疗免疫治疗似乎可行且安全,并且可能在更少的免疫治疗周期下取得与巩固性免疫治疗非劣效的结果。