• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

采用双层原发性动脉切开闭合技术进行颈动脉内膜切除术后的中长期疗效评估。

Evaluation of mid- and long-term outcomes following carotid endarterectomy with a double-layer primary arteriotomy closure technique.

作者信息

Tünel Hüseyin Ali, Hafez İzzet, Diken Adem İlkay, Hanedan Muhammed Onur

机构信息

Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Başkent University Adana Medical and Research Center, Adana, Türkiye.

Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Ahi Evren Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery Training and Research Hospital, Trabzon, Türkiye.

出版信息

Turk Gogus Kalp Damar Cerrahisi Derg. 2025 Apr 30;33(2):133-143. doi: 10.5606/tgkdc.dergisi.2025.27226. eCollection 2025 Apr.

DOI:10.5606/tgkdc.dergisi.2025.27226
PMID:40575058
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12188973/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

This study aims to evaluate the mid- and long-term outcomes of patients who underwent carotid endarterectomy with double-layer primary arteriotomy closure technique.

METHODS

Between January 2011 and January 2021, a total of 94 patients (58 males, 36 females; mean age: 66.5±8.5 years; range, 40 to 82 years) who underwent carotid endarterectomy were retrospectively analyzed. Doppler ultrasonography, computed tomography or magnetic resonance angiography, and digital subtraction angiography were utilized during follow-up. Stenoses of 50% and above were defined as restenosis.

RESULTS

The mean carotid clamp time was 11.72±2.30 and the mean follow-up was 54.18±27.71 months. Two patients (2.1%) underwent revision due to bleeding and hematoma. No new cerebrovascular events were observed in the postoperative period (<30 days). During the follow-up, six (6.4%) patients with ≥50% stenosis on the same side and 14 (14.9%) patients with stenosis on the opposite side were identified. Primary patency rates were found to be 99% at one year, 95.4% at three years, 90% at five years, 71% at seven years, and 71% at nine years. Age was the only independent risk factor affecting survival.

CONCLUSION

Our study results suggest that this technique can be used safely in patients with appropriate internal carotid artery diameter with favorable mid- and long-term patency rates.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在评估采用双层原发性动脉切开闭合技术进行颈动脉内膜切除术患者的中长期预后。

方法

回顾性分析2011年1月至2021年1月期间共94例行颈动脉内膜切除术的患者(58例男性,36例女性;平均年龄:66.5±8.5岁;范围40至82岁)。随访期间采用多普勒超声、计算机断层扫描或磁共振血管造影以及数字减影血管造影。50%及以上的狭窄定义为再狭窄。

结果

平均颈动脉夹闭时间为11.72±2.30分钟,平均随访时间为54.18±27.71个月。2例患者(2.1%)因出血和血肿接受了翻修手术。术后30天内未观察到新的脑血管事件。随访期间,同侧狭窄≥50%的患者有6例(6.4%),对侧狭窄的患者有14例(14.9%)。发现1年时的原发性通畅率为99%,3年时为95.4%,5年时为90%,7年时为71%,9年时为71%。年龄是影响生存的唯一独立危险因素。

结论

我们的研究结果表明,该技术可安全用于具有合适颈内动脉直径的患者,中长期通畅率良好。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1c59/12188973/4f439968b45d/TJTCS-2025-33-2-133-143-F3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1c59/12188973/9b54ec65e772/TJTCS-2025-33-2-133-143-F1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1c59/12188973/3f6ab14f208e/TJTCS-2025-33-2-133-143-F2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1c59/12188973/4f439968b45d/TJTCS-2025-33-2-133-143-F3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1c59/12188973/9b54ec65e772/TJTCS-2025-33-2-133-143-F1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1c59/12188973/3f6ab14f208e/TJTCS-2025-33-2-133-143-F2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1c59/12188973/4f439968b45d/TJTCS-2025-33-2-133-143-F3.jpg

相似文献

1
Evaluation of mid- and long-term outcomes following carotid endarterectomy with a double-layer primary arteriotomy closure technique.采用双层原发性动脉切开闭合技术进行颈动脉内膜切除术后的中长期疗效评估。
Turk Gogus Kalp Damar Cerrahisi Derg. 2025 Apr 30;33(2):133-143. doi: 10.5606/tgkdc.dergisi.2025.27226. eCollection 2025 Apr.
2
Bypass surgery for chronic lower limb ischaemia.慢性下肢缺血的搭桥手术。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Apr 3;4(4):CD002000. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002000.pub3.
3
Duplex ultrasound for diagnosing symptomatic carotid stenosis in the extracranial segments.双功能超声用于诊断颅外段有症状颈动脉狭窄。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Jul 11;7(7):CD013172. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013172.pub2.
4
Eversion versus conventional carotid endarterectomy for preventing stroke.外翻式与传统颈动脉内膜切除术预防卒中的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2001;2000(1):CD001921. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001921.
5
Carotid endarterectomy with patch angioplasty versus primary closure in patients with symptomatic and significant stenosis: a systematic review with meta-analyses and trial sequential analysis of randomized clinical trials.有症状且严重狭窄患者行颈动脉内膜切除术加补片血管成形术与直接缝合术的比较:一项对随机临床试验的系统评价、荟萃分析及试验序贯分析
Syst Rev. 2021 May 6;10(1):139. doi: 10.1186/s13643-021-01692-8.
6
Does Augmenting Irradiated Autografts With Free Vascularized Fibula Graft in Patients With Bone Loss From a Malignant Tumor Achieve Union, Function, and Complication Rate Comparably to Patients Without Bone Loss and Augmentation When Reconstructing Intercalary Resections in the Lower Extremity?对于因恶性肿瘤导致骨缺损的患者,在重建下肢节段性切除时,采用带血管游离腓骨移植来增强照射后的自体骨移植,其骨愈合、功能及并发症发生率与无骨缺损且未进行增强的患者相比是否相当?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Jun 26. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003599.
7
Patch angioplasty versus primary closure for carotid endarterectomy.颈动脉内膜切除术时斑块切除术与直接缝合的比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Aug 3;8(8):CD000160. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000160.pub4.
8
Accurate, practical and cost-effective assessment of carotid stenosis in the UK.英国颈动脉狭窄的准确、实用且具成本效益的评估。
Health Technol Assess. 2006 Aug;10(30):iii-iv, ix-x, 1-182. doi: 10.3310/hta10300.
9
Graft type for femoro-popliteal bypass surgery.股腘动脉搭桥手术的移植物类型。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Feb 11;2(2):CD001487. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001487.pub3.
10
Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension (DASH) for the primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular diseases.用于心血管疾病一级和二级预防的饮食预防高血压(DASH)方案。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 May 6;5(5):CD013729. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013729.pub2.

本文引用的文献

1
Primary versus patching versus eversion as carotid endarterectomy closure.作为颈动脉内膜切除术闭合方式的直接缝合术与补片修补术与外翻缝合术的比较
J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino). 2023 Apr;64(2):174-183. doi: 10.23736/S0021-9509.23.12618-8. Epub 2023 Feb 6.
2
Editor's Choice - Nationwide Outcome Analysis of Primary Carotid Endarterectomy in Symptomatic Patients Depending on Closure Technique and Patch Type.编辑推荐——根据闭合技术和补片类型对有症状患者进行原发性颈动脉内膜切除术的全国性结果分析
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2023 Apr;65(4):467-473. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2022.12.033. Epub 2023 Jan 2.
3
Computer Modeling of Carotid Endarterectomy With the Different Shape Patches and Prediction of the Atherosclerotic Plaque Formation Zones.
Curr Probl Cardiol. 2023 Feb;48(2):101505. doi: 10.1016/j.cpcardiol.2022.101505. Epub 2022 Nov 17.
4
Primary arterial closure after carotid endarterectomy is a safe and expeditious technique in appropriately selected patients.
Am J Surg. 2022 Dec;224(6):1438-1441. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2022.10.009. Epub 2022 Oct 7.
5
Editor's Choice - European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS) 2023 Clinical Practice Guidelines on the Management of Atherosclerotic Carotid and Vertebral Artery Disease.编辑推荐——欧洲血管外科学会(ESVS)2023年动脉粥样硬化性颈动脉和椎动脉疾病管理临床实践指南
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2023 Jan;65(1):7-111. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2022.04.011. Epub 2022 May 20.
6
Five-year outcome of non-shunting and primary closure technique during carotid endarterectomy: a longitudinal cohort study.颈动脉内膜切除术中非分流和直接缝合技术的 5 年结果:一项纵向队列研究。
J Int Med Res. 2022 Apr;50(4):3000605221076925. doi: 10.1177/03000605221076925.
7
Long Term Restenosis Rate After Carotid Endarterectomy: Comparison of Three Surgical Techniques and Intra-Operative Shunt Use.颈动脉内膜切除术治疗颈动脉狭窄后长期再狭窄率:三种手术技术的比较和术中使用转流管。
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2021 Oct;62(4):513-521. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2021.06.028. Epub 2021 Aug 25.
8
The Society for Vascular Surgery implementation document for management of extracranial cerebrovascular disease.血管外科学会关于颅外脑血管疾病管理的实施文件。
J Vasc Surg. 2022 Jan;75(1S):26S-98S. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2021.04.074. Epub 2021 Jun 19.
9
Carotid endarterectomy with patch angioplasty versus primary closure in patients with symptomatic and significant stenosis: a systematic review with meta-analyses and trial sequential analysis of randomized clinical trials.有症状且严重狭窄患者行颈动脉内膜切除术加补片血管成形术与直接缝合术的比较:一项对随机临床试验的系统评价、荟萃分析及试验序贯分析
Syst Rev. 2021 May 6;10(1):139. doi: 10.1186/s13643-021-01692-8.
10
Literature review of primary versus patching versus eversion as carotid endarterectomy closure.颈动脉内膜切除术闭合术的原发性与补丁与外翻的文献复习。
J Vasc Surg. 2021 Aug;74(2):666-675. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2021.02.051. Epub 2021 Apr 20.