Moon Kwangsu, Kim Kyung Woo, Lee Ji Dong
Department of Psychology, Chung-Ang University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Labor Union, Korea Occupational Safety and Health Agency, Ulsan, Republic of Korea.
Saf Health Work. 2025 Jun;16(2):193-199. doi: 10.1016/j.shaw.2025.02.002. Epub 2025 Feb 20.
This study explored the applicability of the Trust Leading Indicator (TLI) and Proactive Leading Indicator (PLI), developed as part of the Vision Zero, a global campaign for the dissemination of prevention culture, in Korean industries. The relationship between these indicators and safety culture-related variables were compared, such as safety climate, safety behavior, risk perception, and accident experience.
The study sample comprised 630 workers from 12 subcontractors affiliated with the Republic of Korea's large manufacturing plant. Correlations among the main variables were examined, including group differences in TLI and PLI based on subjective accident experience.
The TLI and PLI had significant positive correlations with the sub-factors of safety climate and safety behavior and negative correlations with risk perception, indicating their potential utility as extensions of existing safety culture indicators. A significant difference in TLI and PLI was observed across accident experience levels.
Despite limitations, such as the predominance of male workers in the study owing to the nature of the industry and use of subjective accident experience rather than official industrial accident data, this study is significant as it explores the applicability of the two leading indicators of prevention culture in Korean industries, confirming the potential utility of these indicators across various cultural contexts and contributing to global efforts to disseminate a prevention culture.
本研究探讨了作为“零愿景”(一项传播预防文化的全球运动)一部分而开发的信任领先指标(TLI)和主动领先指标(PLI)在韩国工业中的适用性。比较了这些指标与安全文化相关变量之间的关系,如安全氛围、安全行为、风险认知和事故经历。
研究样本包括来自韩国大型制造工厂附属的12个分包商的630名工人。检验了主要变量之间的相关性,包括基于主观事故经历的TLI和PLI的组间差异。
TLI和PLI与安全氛围和安全行为的子因素呈显著正相关,与风险认知呈负相关,表明它们作为现有安全文化指标的扩展具有潜在效用。在不同事故经历水平上观察到TLI和PLI存在显著差异。
尽管存在局限性,如由于行业性质本研究中男性工人占主导地位,且使用的是主观事故经历而非官方工业事故数据,但本研究具有重要意义,因为它探讨了预防文化的两个领先指标在韩国工业中的适用性,证实了这些指标在不同文化背景下的潜在效用,并为传播预防文化的全球努力做出了贡献。