Moore Ramey, Hallgren Emily, Worrell Shani, Wahls Anna, Council Sarah K, King Deanne L, Cheerla Rajalakshmi, Watson Donya, Childs Jacquelene, Garrett-Shaver Martha, McElfish Pearl A
College of Medicine, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences Northwest, 2708 S. 48th St., Springdale, AR, 72762, USA.
Institute for Community Health Innovation, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences Northwest, 2708 S. 48th St., Springdale, AR, 72762, USA.
SSM Qual Res Health. 2025 Jun;7. doi: 10.1016/j.ssmqr.2024.100519. Epub 2024 Dec 19.
This study explores challenges faced by a large, diverse sample of cancer survivors who received care in the rural state of Arkansas to provide holistic insight into the quality of survivorship.
We used a theory-driven exploratory descriptive design to explore cancer survivors' (n = 519) biggest cancer-related challenges.
Cancer survivors' challenges were organized using domains from the Quality of Survival framework: quality of life, survival, managing the side effects, and managing the economic impact. Nearly half (48.4%) of all responses identified challenges related to quality of life, and 39.7% of all responses focused on the challenges of managing the side effects of cancer and its treatment. Managing the economic impact (6.9%) and survival (4.9%) were also identified as challenges by survivors.
Survivors faced a range of challenges from cancer and its treatment. Survivors primarily faced psychosocial challenges, issues with ongoing care, and physical and/or functional sequelae. Managing the economic impact and financial toxicity of cancer treatment and surviving cancer and its treatment were less frequently identified among the challenges faced by survivors.
Our analysis highlights the importance of understanding the psychosocial and physical sequelae of cancer and its treatment. Our research helps fill significant gaps in the literature, improving the understanding of rural cancer survivorship. Nuanced understanding of survivors' experiences, using theory-driven qualitative and mixed-methods approaches, will continue to be critical for developing effective, evidence-based practices to meet the needs of survivors.
本研究探讨了在阿肯色州这个农村地区接受治疗的大量、多样化癌症幸存者样本所面临的挑战,以便全面洞察生存质量。
我们采用了一种理论驱动的探索性描述性设计,以探究癌症幸存者(n = 519)与癌症相关的最大挑战。
癌症幸存者的挑战依据“生存质量”框架的各个领域进行组织:生活质量、生存、应对副作用以及应对经济影响。所有回复中近一半(48.4%)指出了与生活质量相关的挑战,39.7%的回复聚焦于应对癌症及其治疗副作用的挑战。幸存者也将应对经济影响(6.9%)和生存(4.9%)视为挑战。
幸存者面临着来自癌症及其治疗的一系列挑战。幸存者主要面临心理社会挑战、持续护理问题以及身体和/或功能后遗症。在幸存者所面临的挑战中,较少有人提及应对癌症治疗的经济影响和财务毒性以及战胜癌症及其治疗。
我们的分析凸显了理解癌症及其治疗的心理社会和身体后遗症的重要性。我们的研究有助于填补文献中的重大空白,增进对农村癌症幸存者的了解。运用理论驱动的定性和混合方法对幸存者经历进行细致入微的理解,对于制定有效的循证实践以满足幸存者需求而言,仍将至关重要。