Validation of the Quality Assessment Tool for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Real-World Studies.
作者信息
Gebrye Tadesse, Mbada Chidozie, Hakimi Zalmai, Fatoye Francis
机构信息
Department of Health Professions, Faculty of Health and Education, Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester, UK.
Swedish Orphan Biovitrum AB, Stockholm, Sweden.
出版信息
J Evid Based Med. 2025 Jun;18(2):e70052. doi: 10.1111/jebm.70052.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Validation of the Quality Assessment Tool for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Real-World Studies.真实世界研究系统评价和Meta分析质量评估工具的验证
J Evid Based Med. 2025 Jun;18(2):e70052. doi: 10.1111/jebm.70052.
2
A critical appraisal of the methodology and quality of evidence of systematic reviews and meta-analyses of traditional Chinese medical nursing interventions: a systematic review of reviews.对中医护理干预系统评价和Meta分析的方法学及证据质量的批判性评价：一项综述的系统评价
BMJ Open. 2016 Nov 14;6(11):e011514. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011514.
3
AI for IMPACTS Framework for Evaluating the Long-Term Real-World Impacts of AI-Powered Clinician Tools: Systematic Review and Narrative Synthesis.用于评估人工智能驱动的临床医生工具长期现实世界影响的AI for IMPACTS框架：系统评价与叙述性综合分析
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Feb 5;27:e67485. doi: 10.2196/67485.
4
Quality assessment of systematic reviews for surgical treatment of low back pain: an overview.腰痛手术治疗系统评价的质量评估：综述
Spine J. 2016 May;16(5):667-75. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2016.01.185. Epub 2016 Jan 27.
5
The quantity, quality and findings of network meta-analyses evaluating the effectiveness of GLP-1 RAs for weight loss: a scoping review.评估胰高血糖素样肽-1受体激动剂（GLP-1 RAs）减肥效果的网状Meta分析的数量、质量及结果：一项范围综述
Health Technol Assess. 2025 Jun 25:1-73. doi: 10.3310/SKHT8119.
6
Acupuncture and moxibustion for irritable bowel syndrome: An umbrella systematic review.针灸治疗肠易激综合征：一项伞形系统评价。
J Integr Med. 2024 Jan;22(1):22-31. doi: 10.1016/j.joim.2023.12.001. Epub 2023 Dec 23.
7
Benefits and harms of exercise therapy and physical activity for low back pain: An umbrella review.运动疗法和身体活动对腰痛的益处与危害：一项伞状综述。
J Sport Health Sci. 2025 Apr 2;14:101038. doi: 10.1016/j.jshs.2025.101038.
8
Systematic Reviews in Sports Medicine.运动医学系统评价
Am J Sports Med. 2016 Feb;44(2):533-8. doi: 10.1177/0363546515580290. Epub 2015 Apr 21.
9
WHO Environmental Noise Guidelines for the European Region: A Systematic Review on Environmental Noise and Adverse Birth Outcomes.世界卫生组织欧洲区域环境噪声指南：关于环境噪声与不良出生结局的系统评价
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017 Oct 19;14(10):1252. doi: 10.3390/ijerph14101252.
10
Risk of bias from inclusion of patients who already have diagnosis of or are undergoing treatment for depression in diagnostic accuracy studies of screening tools for depression: systematic review.对用于诊断抑郁症的筛查工具的诊断准确性研究中纳入已经患有或正在接受抑郁症治疗的患者所带来的偏倚风险：系统综述。
BMJ. 2011 Aug 18;343:d4825. doi: 10.1136/bmj.d4825.
本文引用的文献
1
Development of quality assessment tool for systematic reviews and meta-analyses of real-world studies: a Delphi consensus survey.真实世界研究系统评价和荟萃分析质量评估工具的开发：德尔菲共识调查。
Rheumatol Int. 2024 Jul;44(7):1275-1281. doi: 10.1007/s00296-024-05595-4. Epub 2024 Apr 29.
2
Improving the reliability of measurements in orthopaedics and sports medicine.提高矫形外科和运动医学测量的可靠性。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2023 Dec;31(12):5277-5285. doi: 10.1007/s00167-023-07635-1. Epub 2023 Oct 30.
3
A scoping review on quality assessment tools used in systematic reviews and meta-analysis of real-world studies.系统评价和真实世界研究荟萃分析中使用的质量评估工具的范围综述。
Rheumatol Int. 2023 Sep;43(9):1573-1581. doi: 10.1007/s00296-023-05354-x. Epub 2023 Jun 16.
4
Real-world data: a brief review of the methods, applications, challenges and opportunities.真实世界数据：方法、应用、挑战和机遇的简要回顾。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2022 Nov 5;22(1):287. doi: 10.1186/s12874-022-01768-6.
5
Rationale, Strengths, and Limitations of Real-World Evidence in Oncology: A Canadian Review and Perspective.肿瘤学中真实世界证据的理由、优势和局限性：加拿大的回顾与观点。
Oncologist. 2022 Sep 2;27(9):e731-e738. doi: 10.1093/oncolo/oyac114.
6
Real-world studies: bridging the gap between trial-assessed efficacy and routine care.真实世界研究：弥合试验评估疗效与常规护理之间的差距。
J Biomed Res. 2022 May 10;36(3):147-154. doi: 10.7555/JBR.36.20220040.
7
Real-World Evidence: Bridging Gaps in Evidence to Guide Payer Decisions.真实世界证据：弥合证据差距以指导支付方决策。
Pharmacoecon Open. 2021 Mar;5(1):3-11. doi: 10.1007/s41669-020-00221-y.
8
A Guideline of Selecting and Reporting Intraclass Correlation Coefficients for Reliability Research.可靠性研究中组内相关系数选择与报告指南
J Chiropr Med. 2016 Jun;15(2):155-63. doi: 10.1016/j.jcm.2016.02.012. Epub 2016 Mar 31.
9
Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis: Understanding the Best Evidence in Primary Healthcare.系统评价与Meta分析：理解初级卫生保健中的最佳证据。
J Family Med Prim Care. 2013 Jan;2(1):9-14. doi: 10.4103/2249-4863.109934.
10
Testing a tool for assessing the risk of bias for nonrandomized studies showed moderate reliability and promising validity.测试一种用于评估非随机研究偏倚风险的工具显示出了中等的可靠性和有前途的有效性。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2013 Apr;66(4):408-14. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2012.09.016. Epub 2013 Jan 18.
Zotero 插件