• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

针对英国背景设计的简短在线个性化反馈干预措施预防、减少和应对赌博危害的试点随机试验。

Pilot Randomised Trial of a Brief Online Personalised Feedback Intervention for the UK Context Designed To Prevent, Reduce, and Address Gambling Harm.

作者信息

Cunningham John A, Hodgins David C, Sharman Stephen, Walker Hollie, Schell Christina

机构信息

National Addiction Centre, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.

Institute for Mental Health and Policy Research, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, ON, Canada.

出版信息

J Gambl Stud. 2025 Jun 27. doi: 10.1007/s10899-025-10401-2.

DOI:10.1007/s10899-025-10401-2
PMID:40576930
Abstract

Participation in online gambling is growing and the risk of experiencing harms is also increasing. Brief personalised feedback interventions have been shown to prevent, reduce and address gambling harm and this randomised controlled trial tested the effectiveness of a version customised for the UK. A sample of 1586 online gambling participants with moderate or problem gambling were rapidly recruited from an existing Internet panel of UK residents. Participants were randomised to a no intervention control group or received the self-directed, online intervention which included normative feedback and personalised information explaining the consequences of gambling above lower-risk guidelines. One- and three-month follow-ups assessed the short-term impact on frequency and harm. Feedback and recommendations were collected to guide improvements and increase future utility. All gambling outcomes showed improvement between the initial survey and both follow-ups, however, there were no differences between the intervention and control groups. Most participants displayed normative misperceptions when estimating how much others the same age and gender gambled. The majority of the sample had never previously sought treatment despite over a third of these reporting moderate or problematic levels of gambling. There is need for a publicly available, low-cost alternative to traditional treatment in order to help the large proportion of people with gambling concerns who would not otherwise seek formal support. Although an intervention effect was not detected in this sample, Internet-based alternatives remain a promising opportunity meriting further research.

摘要

参与在线赌博的人数在不断增加,遭受危害的风险也在上升。简短的个性化反馈干预已被证明可以预防、减少和解决赌博危害,这项随机对照试验测试了一个为英国定制版本的有效性。从现有的英国居民互联网面板中迅速招募了1586名有中度或问题赌博行为的在线赌博参与者作为样本。参与者被随机分为无干预对照组或接受自我指导的在线干预,该干预包括规范反馈和个性化信息,解释高于低风险指导方针的赌博后果。在1个月和3个月的随访中评估了对赌博频率和危害的短期影响。收集反馈和建议以指导改进并提高未来的效用。所有赌博结果在初始调查和两次随访之间均有所改善,然而,干预组和对照组之间没有差异。大多数参与者在估计同年龄和性别的其他人赌博量时存在规范误解。尽管超过三分之一的样本报告有中度或问题赌博水平,但大多数人此前从未寻求过治疗。需要一种公开可用的、低成本的传统治疗替代方案,以帮助大部分有赌博问题但不会寻求正式支持的人。尽管在这个样本中未检测到干预效果,但基于互联网的替代方案仍然是一个有前景的机会,值得进一步研究。

相似文献

1
Pilot Randomised Trial of a Brief Online Personalised Feedback Intervention for the UK Context Designed To Prevent, Reduce, and Address Gambling Harm.针对英国背景设计的简短在线个性化反馈干预措施预防、减少和应对赌博危害的试点随机试验。
J Gambl Stud. 2025 Jun 27. doi: 10.1007/s10899-025-10401-2.
2
Prescription of Controlled Substances: Benefits and Risks管制药品的处方:益处与风险
3
Group-based interventions to reduce gambling involvement among male football fans: a synopsis of findings from a feasibility study.基于群体的干预措施以减少男性足球迷的赌博行为:一项可行性研究结果概述
Public Health Res (Southampt). 2025 Jul;13(6):1-24. doi: 10.3310/SWWP9393.
4
A digital intervention to improve mental health and interpersonal resilience for young people who have experienced online sexual abuse: the i-Minds non-randomised feasibility clinical trial and nested qualitative study.一项针对遭受网络性虐待的年轻人改善心理健康和人际恢复力的数字干预措施:i-Minds非随机可行性临床试验及嵌套定性研究
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 Jul;13(28):1-27. doi: 10.3310/THAL8732.
5
Digital augmentation of aftercare for patients with anorexia nervosa: the TRIANGLE RCT and economic evaluation.神经性厌食症患者后期护理的数字化增强:TRIANGLE随机对照试验及经济评估
Health Technol Assess. 2025 Jul;29(31):1-162. doi: 10.3310/ADLS3672.
6
Nutritional interventions for survivors of childhood cancer.儿童癌症幸存者的营养干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Aug 22;2016(8):CD009678. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009678.pub2.
7
Falls prevention interventions for community-dwelling older adults: systematic review and meta-analysis of benefits, harms, and patient values and preferences.社区居住的老年人跌倒预防干预措施:系统评价和荟萃分析的益处、危害以及患者的价值观和偏好。
Syst Rev. 2024 Nov 26;13(1):289. doi: 10.1186/s13643-024-02681-3.
8
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.慢性斑块状银屑病的全身药理学治疗:一项网状荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Dec 22;12(12):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub2.
9
Personalised digital interventions for reducing hazardous and harmful alcohol consumption in community-dwelling populations.针对社区居住人群减少有害和危险饮酒行为的个性化数字干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Sep 25;9(9):CD011479. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011479.pub2.
10
Home treatment for mental health problems: a systematic review.心理健康问题的居家治疗:一项系统综述
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(15):1-139. doi: 10.3310/hta5150.

本文引用的文献

1
Applying the Canadian Low-Risk Gambling Guidelines to Gambling Harm Reduction in England.将加拿大低风险赌博准则应用于英格兰的赌博伤害减少。
J Gambl Stud. 2024 Mar;40(1):21-28. doi: 10.1007/s10899-022-10186-8. Epub 2023 Jan 8.
2
How survey mode affects estimates of the prevalence of gambling harm: a multisurvey study.调查模式如何影响赌博危害发生率的估计:一项多调查研究。
Public Health. 2022 Mar;204:63-69. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2021.12.014. Epub 2022 Feb 15.
3
Internet-based treatment of gambling problems: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
基于互联网的赌博问题治疗:随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Behav Addict. 2021 Sep 17;10(3):546-565. doi: 10.1556/2006.2021.00062.
4
Interventions to reduce the public health burden of gambling-related harms: a mapping review.干预措施以减轻赌博相关危害对公共健康的负担:一项映射综述。
Lancet Public Health. 2021 Jan;6(1):e50-e63. doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(20)30230-9.
5
Outcomes of two randomized controlled trials, employing participants recruited through Mechanical Turk, of Internet interventions targeting unhealthy alcohol use.通过 Mechanical Turk 招募参与者的两项随机对照试验的结果,评估了针对不健康饮酒的互联网干预措施。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2019 Jun 14;19(1):124. doi: 10.1186/s12874-019-0770-4.
6
Validation of the Short Gambling Harm Screen (SGHS): A Tool for Assessment of Harms from Gambling.短赌博危害筛查表(SGHS)的验证:一种用于评估赌博危害的工具。
J Gambl Stud. 2018 Jun;34(2):499-512. doi: 10.1007/s10899-017-9698-y.
7
A randomized controlled trial of a personalized feedback intervention for problem gamblers.一项针对问题赌徒的个性化反馈干预的随机对照试验。
PLoS One. 2012;7(2):e31586. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0031586. Epub 2012 Feb 14.
8
Hesitation to seek gambling-related treatment among Ontario problem gamblers.安大略省问题赌徒寻求赌博相关治疗的犹豫。
J Addict Med. 2012 Mar;6(1):39-49. doi: 10.1097/ADM.0b013e3182307dbb.
9
A randomized controlled trial of an internet-based intervention for alcohol abusers.一项基于互联网的干预措施治疗酒精滥用者的随机对照试验。
Addiction. 2009 Dec;104(12):2023-32. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2009.02726.x.
10
The Gambling Symptom Assessment Scale (G-SAS): a reliability and validity study.赌博症状评估量表(G-SAS):一项信效度研究。
Psychiatry Res. 2009 Mar 31;166(1):76-84. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2007.11.008. Epub 2009 Feb 5.