Suppr超能文献

基于压力的二氧化碳描记法选择术中呼气末正压:一项概念验证研究

Intraoperative PEEP selection by pressure-based capnography: a proof of concept study.

作者信息

Tusman Gerardo, Nicolás Matías, Carmona Alejandro, Sipmann Fernando Suarez, Tusman Ulises, Kremeier Peter, Böhm Stephan H

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology, Hospital Privado de Comunidad, Mar del Plata, Argentina.

Department of Surgery, Hospital Privado de Comunidad, Mar del Plata, Argentina.

出版信息

J Clin Monit Comput. 2025 Aug;39(4):739-744. doi: 10.1007/s10877-025-01318-7. Epub 2025 Jun 27.

Abstract

PURPOSE

We aimed to test a new method to determine the positive-end expiratory pressure (PEEP) that maintains the lungs open after a recruitment maneuver (RM).

METHODS

In eleven anesthetized patients, we compared the standard RM searching for the optimal PEEP based on the highest respiratory compliance (PEEP), with a new method. This method performs a RM during a slow pressure-volume curve and detects the optimal PEEP using the novel barometric capnography curve (BCap); i.e. the plot of expired carbon dioxide versus airway pressure. The lungs' closing pressure was detected when the slope of phase III of the BCap changed along this slow expiration (PEEP). The main objective was to compare PEEP with the reference PEEP. As a secondary objective, we explored the association between PEEP and the polarity change in end-expiratory transpulmonary pressure (PEEP) during the deflation phase of a slow flow PV curve.

RESULTS

We found a PEEP of 8.5(3.3) cmHO that was no statistically different from the PEEP of 10.0(4.0) cmHO (p = 0.72). Both methods correlated well with a Rho of 0.84 (p < 0.001). The Bland-Altman plot showed a bias of 0.19 and LOA of 1.92 cmHO (95%CI -0.39 to 0.77 cmHO). During the PV slow deflation limb, PEEP was 9.3(4.3), which was statistically similar to PEEP (p = 0.61). Both pressures were strongly correlated (Rho = 0.93, p < 0.001) with a bias of -0.3 cmHO and LOA of 1.52 (95%CI -0.76 to 0.16 cmHO).

CONCLUSIONS

We concluded that BCap is feasible to detect lungs collapse using a constant flow PV curve.

摘要

目的

我们旨在测试一种新方法,以确定在肺复张手法(RM)后维持肺开放的呼气末正压(PEEP)。

方法

在11例麻醉患者中,我们将基于最高呼吸顺应性寻找最佳PEEP的标准RM与一种新方法进行了比较。该方法在缓慢压力-容积曲线期间进行RM,并使用新型气压二氧化碳图曲线(BCap)检测最佳PEEP;即呼出二氧化碳与气道压力的关系图。当BCap第三阶段的斜率在缓慢呼气过程中发生变化时,检测肺闭合压(PEEP)。主要目的是将PEEP与参考PEEP进行比较。作为次要目的,我们探讨了在缓慢流速压力-容积曲线放气阶段PEEP与呼气末跨肺压(PEEP)极性变化之间的关联。

结果

我们发现PEEP为8.5(3.3)cmH₂O,与10.0(4.0)cmH₂O的PEEP无统计学差异(p = 0.72)。两种方法的相关性良好,Rho为0.84(p < 0.001)。Bland-Altman图显示偏差为0.19,一致性界限为1.92 cmH₂O(95%CI -0.39至0.77 cmH₂O)。在压力-容积缓慢放气阶段,PEEP为9.3(4.3),与PEEP在统计学上相似(p = 0.61)。两种压力高度相关(Rho = 0.93,p < 0.001),偏差为-0.3 cmH₂O,一致性界限为1.52(95%CI -0.76至0.16 cmH₂O)。

结论

我们得出结论,使用恒流压力-容积曲线,BCap检测肺萎陷是可行的。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验