Gondwe Laila, Mumba Chisoni, Besa Kezzy, Phiri Davies, Kabbudula Exillia, Mebelo Noanga, Sichone Suwilanji S, Sinyangwe Ntazana N, Kayula Mwila, Mainda Geoffrey, Kivaria Fredrick M, Bebay Charles, Soumare Baba, Niwael Mtui-Malamsha J, Makungu Chitwambi
Department of Disease Control, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Zambia, Lusaka, Zambia.
Department of Community Education and Lifelong Learning, University of Zambia, Lusaka, Zambia.
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2025 Jun 27;19(6):e0012893. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0012893. eCollection 2025 Jun.
The study aimed to investigate the socio-economic impacts of anthrax outbreaks on rural communities in selected Game Management Areas (GMAs) of Zambia, with a particular focus on how livelihood diversification influences exposure to zoonotic disease risk. We used a mixed-methods approach to assess how environmental, economic, and social factors interact to shape community vulnerability and resilience. The central hypothesis is that proximity to wildlife and reliance on high-risk alternative livelihoods, such as charcoal burning, fishing, and unregulated game meat consumption, heighten household exposure to anthrax, particularly in contexts of limited veterinary access and social protection. Quantitative results showed that 87.9% of households were adversely affected by drought, with 69.1% receiving no external assistance. Coping strategies included charcoal burning, fishing, and gardening, with less than 30% benefiting from social cash transfer programs. Qualitative data provided depth to these findings, illustrating how anthrax outbreaks compounded food insecurity by decimating livestock, a critical source of food and income. Participants emphasized the need for livelihood diversification, such as beekeeping, poultry farming, and small-scale businesses, to mitigate the dual challenges of climatic shocks and zoonotic diseases. Gendered dimensions of vulnerability were also evident, with women disproportionately affected by food insecurity and economic barriers. This integration of quantitative and qualitative data highlights the complex interplay of environmental, economic, and social factors influencing resilience in rural communities. The study underscores the urgent need for comprehensive interventions to address systemic vulnerabilities, promote livelihood diversification, and strengthen food security. Tailored approaches, particularly those empowering women and marginalized groups, are crucial for enhancing community resilience and reducing the impacts of zoonotic diseases like anthrax.
该研究旨在调查炭疽疫情对赞比亚选定野生动物管理区(GMA)农村社区的社会经济影响,特别关注生计多样化如何影响人畜共患病风险暴露。我们采用混合方法评估环境、经济和社会因素如何相互作用,塑造社区的脆弱性和恢复力。核心假设是,靠近野生动物以及依赖高风险的替代生计,如烧炭、捕鱼和无节制地食用野味,会增加家庭接触炭疽的风险,尤其是在兽医服务和社会保护有限的情况下。定量结果显示,87.9%的家庭受到干旱的不利影响,69.1%的家庭未获得外部援助。应对策略包括烧炭、捕鱼和园艺,不到30%的家庭受益于社会现金转移计划。定性数据为这些发现提供了深度,说明了炭疽疫情如何通过大量减少作为食物和收入重要来源的牲畜,加剧了粮食不安全状况。参与者强调需要实现生计多样化,如养蜂、家禽养殖和小型企业,以减轻气候冲击和人畜共患病带来的双重挑战。脆弱性的性别层面也很明显,妇女在粮食不安全和经济障碍方面受到的影响尤为严重。定量和定性数据的整合凸显了影响农村社区恢复力的环境、经济和社会因素之间的复杂相互作用。该研究强调迫切需要采取全面干预措施,以解决系统性脆弱性问题,促进生计多样化,并加强粮食安全。量身定制的方法,特别是那些赋予妇女和边缘化群体权力的方法,对于增强社区恢复力和减少炭疽等人畜共患病的影响至关重要。