Suppr超能文献

胃癌组织样本中claudin 18.2实验室检测的一致性:独立能力验证及描述性非干预性研究

Concordance of laboratory assays for claudin 18.2 in gastric cancer tissue samples: independent proficiency testing and a descriptive non-interventional study.

作者信息

Röcken Christoph, Höhn Anne Kathrin, Neumann Jens, Schildhaus Hans-Ulrich, Singer Stephan, Clauditz Till S, Quaas Alexander, Jöhrens Korinna

机构信息

Department of Pathology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Arnold-Heller-Str 3, 24105, Kiel, Germany.

Universität Leipzig, Haus G, Liebigstraße 26, 04103, Leipzig, Germany.

出版信息

Virchows Arch. 2025 Jun 28. doi: 10.1007/s00428-025-04138-x.

Abstract

Biomarker testing is vital for personalized cancer treatment with improved efficacy based on genotype and biomarker expression. This prospective, in vitro, non-interventional study accompanied an independent proficiency test to descriptively analyze the results of immunohistochemical claudin 18.2 (CLDN18.2) testing in gastric cancer tissue samples by laboratories in Germany, Austria, and Switzerland, using assays independently established in their institutions. CLDN18.2 is a biomarker and drug target for locally advanced unresectable/metastatic gastric and pancreatic cancer. During an open proficiency test (OPT), laboratories were provided with 10 gastric cancer tissue samples (cases) for staining, interpretation, and scoring by a pathologist. Results were submitted with stained tumor cell percentage and a binary CLDN18.2-positive/negative result for each sample (cut-off: ≥ 75% of tumor cells expressing membranous CLDN18 with ≥ 2+ [moderate to strong] staining intensity). Successful participation was defined as ≥ 90% of cases evaluated correctly. Overall proficiency of the OPT was acceptable if ≥ 80% of laboratories participated successfully. Fifty-four institutes registered for the OPT, and one resigned. Forty-two of 53 (79.2%) institutes participated successfully. The main source of errors was false negative results (false negative rate, 12%; false positive rate, 1%). Overall accuracy was 91%. The CLDN18 (43-14A) clone was used most frequently, with optimal staining results and minor interpretation problems observed. Two antibodies were associated with false negative results (ZR451 [Zeta/Zytomed]; EPR19202 [Abcam]). Staining quality was the major factor for successful analysis; interpretation errors were not significant. Ongoing quality assurance will enable establishment of appropriate staining protocols and accurate CLDN18.2 interpretation, thereby facilitating individually optimized treatment.

摘要

生物标志物检测对于基于基因型和生物标志物表达提高疗效的个性化癌症治疗至关重要。这项前瞻性、体外、非干预性研究伴随一项独立的能力验证试验,以描述性分析德国、奥地利和瑞士的实验室使用各自机构独立建立的检测方法,对胃癌组织样本进行免疫组化claudin 18.2(CLDN18.2)检测的结果。CLDN18.2是局部晚期不可切除/转移性胃癌和胰腺癌的生物标志物及药物靶点。在一项开放式能力验证试验(OPT)中,为各实验室提供了10份胃癌组织样本(病例),由病理学家进行染色、解读和评分。结果需提交每个样本的染色肿瘤细胞百分比以及CLDN18.2的二元阳性/阴性结果(临界值:≥75%的肿瘤细胞表达膜性CLDN18且染色强度≥2+[中度至强])。成功参与定义为正确评估的病例≥90%。如果≥80%的实验室成功参与,则OPT的总体能力可接受。54家机构报名参加OPT,1家退出。53家机构中的42家(79.2%)成功参与。错误的主要来源是假阴性结果(假阴性率为12%;假阳性率为1%)。总体准确率为91%。CLDN18(43-14A)克隆使用最为频繁,观察到染色结果最佳且解读问题较少。两种抗体与假阴性结果相关(ZR451 [Zeta/Zytomed];EPR19202 [Abcam])。染色质量是成功分析的主要因素;解读错误不显著。持续的质量保证将有助于建立合适的染色方案并准确解读CLDN18.2,从而促进个体化的优化治疗。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验