• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

社会阶层的大众认知:一种基于财富的群体认知与刻板印象的混合研究方法。

Lay representations of social class: A mixed methods approach to wealth-based group perceptions and stereotypes.

作者信息

Del Fresno-Díaz Ángel, García-Sánchez Efraín, Padial-Rojas Elena, Willis Guillermo B, de Lemus Soledad

机构信息

Department of Social Psychology, University of Granada, Granada, Spain.

Institute of Psychology, University of Gdańsk, Gdańsk, Poland.

出版信息

Br J Soc Psychol. 2025 Jul;64(3):e70003. doi: 10.1111/bjso.70003.

DOI:10.1111/bjso.70003
PMID:40579770
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12205169/
Abstract

People's perceptions of social classes may differ from scholars' definitions. We used a mixed method, sensitive to context, to examine lay perceptions of social classes in Spain. In Study 1 (N = 90), we conducted qualitative interviews to examine how people spontaneously characterize wealth-based groups. Participants identified between two and seven groups. We grouped these into five main analytical categories for analytical purposes: poor, lower and working classes, middle classes, upper classes and rich and beyond. These groups were described based on material characteristics, traits and culture. Positive traits were mainly associated with non-wealthy groups, especially the lower and working classes, while negative traits were associated with wealthy groups. In Studies 2 (N = 251) and 3 (N = 190), we extended these findings quantitatively, showing that positive stereotypes were associated with non-wealthy groups, whereas negative stereotypes were associated with wealthy groups. Using psychometric networks, non-wealthy groups were ascribed more positive traits-with some ambivalences-while wealthy groups were mainly described using negative traits. We confirmed this pattern of results through meta-analyses. These findings highlight the importance of lay perspectives in theoretical frameworks and the need for context-sensitive approaches in analysing social class representations.

摘要

人们对社会阶层的认知可能与学者的定义有所不同。我们采用了一种结合多种方法且考虑情境因素的方式,来研究西班牙民众对社会阶层的认知。在研究1(N = 90)中,我们进行了定性访谈,以探究人们如何自发地对基于财富的群体进行特征描述。参与者识别出了2至7个群体。为了便于分析,我们将这些群体归为五个主要的分析类别:贫困阶层、下层和工人阶级、中产阶级、上层阶级以及富裕阶层及以上。这些群体是根据物质特征、特质和文化来描述的。积极特质主要与非富裕群体相关,尤其是下层和工人阶级,而消极特质则与富裕群体相关。在研究2(N = 251)和研究3(N = 190)中,我们对这些发现进行了定量扩展,结果表明积极的刻板印象与非富裕群体相关,而消极的刻板印象与富裕群体相关。通过心理测量网络分析,非富裕群体被赋予了更多积极特质——尽管存在一些矛盾之处——而富裕群体主要被用消极特质来描述。我们通过元分析证实了这一结果模式。这些发现凸显了民众观点在理论框架中的重要性,以及在分析社会阶层表征时采用考虑情境因素方法的必要性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0d69/12205169/5d1071957a7c/BJSO-64-0-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0d69/12205169/801256e3ebf5/BJSO-64-0-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0d69/12205169/bf3b197ab43e/BJSO-64-0-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0d69/12205169/3bab8288e63f/BJSO-64-0-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0d69/12205169/8ecb7c2b89ba/BJSO-64-0-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0d69/12205169/2dd63861704d/BJSO-64-0-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0d69/12205169/a5b9784342e9/BJSO-64-0-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0d69/12205169/ad450636403d/BJSO-64-0-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0d69/12205169/5d1071957a7c/BJSO-64-0-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0d69/12205169/801256e3ebf5/BJSO-64-0-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0d69/12205169/bf3b197ab43e/BJSO-64-0-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0d69/12205169/3bab8288e63f/BJSO-64-0-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0d69/12205169/8ecb7c2b89ba/BJSO-64-0-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0d69/12205169/2dd63861704d/BJSO-64-0-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0d69/12205169/a5b9784342e9/BJSO-64-0-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0d69/12205169/ad450636403d/BJSO-64-0-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0d69/12205169/5d1071957a7c/BJSO-64-0-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Lay representations of social class: A mixed methods approach to wealth-based group perceptions and stereotypes.社会阶层的大众认知:一种基于财富的群体认知与刻板印象的混合研究方法。
Br J Soc Psychol. 2025 Jul;64(3):e70003. doi: 10.1111/bjso.70003.
2
Factors that influence parents' and informal caregivers' views and practices regarding routine childhood vaccination: a qualitative evidence synthesis.影响父母和非正式照顾者对常规儿童疫苗接种看法和做法的因素:定性证据综合分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Oct 27;10(10):CD013265. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013265.pub2.
3
Perceptions and experiences of the prevention, detection, and management of postpartum haemorrhage: a qualitative evidence synthesis.预防、检测和管理产后出血的认知和经验:定性证据综合。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Nov 27;11(11):CD013795. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013795.pub2.
4
Stakeholders' perceptions and experiences of factors influencing the commissioning, delivery, and uptake of general health checks: a qualitative evidence synthesis.利益相关者对影响一般健康检查的委托、提供和接受因素的看法与体验:一项定性证据综合分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Mar 20;3(3):CD014796. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014796.pub2.
5
How lived experiences of illness trajectories, burdens of treatment, and social inequalities shape service user and caregiver participation in health and social care: a theory-informed qualitative evidence synthesis.疾病轨迹的生活经历、治疗负担和社会不平等如何影响服务使用者和照顾者参与健康和社会护理:一项基于理论的定性证据综合分析
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 Jun;13(24):1-120. doi: 10.3310/HGTQ8159.
6
Eliciting adverse effects data from participants in clinical trials.从临床试验参与者中获取不良反应数据。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jan 16;1(1):MR000039. doi: 10.1002/14651858.MR000039.pub2.
7
Participation in environmental enhancement and conservation activities for health and well-being in adults: a review of quantitative and qualitative evidence.成年人参与促进环境改善和保护活动对健康与福祉的影响:定量和定性证据综述
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 May 21;2016(5):CD010351. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010351.pub2.
8
Survivor, family and professional experiences of psychosocial interventions for sexual abuse and violence: a qualitative evidence synthesis.性虐待和暴力的心理社会干预的幸存者、家庭和专业人员的经验:定性证据综合。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Oct 4;10(10):CD013648. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013648.pub2.
9
Drugs for preventing postoperative nausea and vomiting in adults after general anaesthesia: a network meta-analysis.成人全身麻醉后预防术后恶心呕吐的药物:网状Meta分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Oct 19;10(10):CD012859. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012859.pub2.
10
Systemic treatments for metastatic cutaneous melanoma.转移性皮肤黑色素瘤的全身治疗
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Feb 6;2(2):CD011123. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011123.pub2.

本文引用的文献

1
Social class group identity, intergroup attitudes, and views on social mobility and inequality in the U.K. and the U.S.英国和美国的社会阶层群体认同、群体间态度以及对社会流动和不平等的看法
Soc Issues Policy Rev. 2025 Apr;25(1). doi: 10.1111/asap.12431. Epub 2024 Oct 4.
2
A Psychological Network Approach to Attitudes and Preventive Behaviors During Pandemics: A COVID-19 Study in the United Kingdom and the Netherlands.大流行期间态度与预防行为的心理网络方法:英国和荷兰的一项关于新冠疫情的研究
Soc Psychol Personal Sci. 2022 Jan;13(1):233-245. doi: 10.1177/19485506211002420.
3
Mapping gender stereotypes: a network analysis approach.
映射性别刻板印象:一种网络分析方法。
Front Psychol. 2023 Jul 18;14:1193866. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1193866. eCollection 2023.
4
How living in economically unequal societies shapes our minds and our social lives.经济不平等社会如何塑造我们的思维和社会生活。
Br J Psychol. 2023 May;114(2):515-531. doi: 10.1111/bjop.12632. Epub 2023 Jan 27.
5
Not all poor are equal: the perpetuation of poverty through blaming those who have been poor all their lives.并非所有贫困人口都是一样的:通过指责那些一生都贫困的人来使贫困持续下去。
Curr Psychol. 2022 Oct 5:1-17. doi: 10.1007/s12144-022-03804-6.
6
Studying Socioeconomic Status: Conceptual Problems and an Alternative Path Forward.研究社会经济地位:概念问题与前进的替代路径。
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2023 Mar;18(2):275-292. doi: 10.1177/17456916221093615. Epub 2022 Aug 18.
7
Navigating the social world: Toward an integrated framework for evaluating self, individuals, and groups.《社会世界的导航:评估自我、个体和群体的综合框架》
Psychol Rev. 2021 Mar;128(2):290-314. doi: 10.1037/rev0000262. Epub 2020 Sep 17.
8
Social Class Competence Stereotypes Are Amplified by Socially Signaled Economic Inequality.社会阶层能力刻板印象会因社会所传递的经济不平等而被放大。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2021 Jan;47(1):89-105. doi: 10.1177/0146167220916640. Epub 2020 May 22.
9
Stereotypes as Historical Accidents: Images of Social Class in Postcommunist Versus Capitalist Societies.刻板印象作为历史偶然:后共产主义与资本主义社会中社会阶级的形象。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2020 Jun;46(6):927-943. doi: 10.1177/0146167219881434. Epub 2019 Oct 15.
10
Economic Inequality and Masculinity-Femininity: The Prevailing Perceived Traits in Higher Unequal Contexts Are Masculine.经济不平等与男性气质-女性气质:在高度不平等的环境中普遍被认为的特质是男性化的。
Front Psychol. 2019 Jul 30;10:1590. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01590. eCollection 2019.