• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一周一次、两次还是三次?探讨强化离心运动中力量和肌肉增长的最佳频率。

One, two, or three times a week? examining the optimal frequency for strength and muscle growth in accentuated eccentric exercise.

作者信息

Refsnes Per Egil, Medbø Jon Ingulf, Jakobsen Vidar, Vilberg Arne, Vikne Harald

机构信息

Norwegian Olympic Sports Center, Oslo, Norway.

Faculty of Teacher Education, Culture and Sports, Western Norway University of Applied Sciences, Sogndal, Norway.

出版信息

Eur J Appl Physiol. 2025 Jun 28. doi: 10.1007/s00421-025-05828-9.

DOI:10.1007/s00421-025-05828-9
PMID:40580213
Abstract

PURPOSE

This study examines the effects of performing accentuated eccentric loading (AEL) resistance exercise one, two, or three times per week, with equal session doses, in resistance-trained athletes.

METHODS

Twenty-three strength-trained athletes were allocated to one of three exercise groups: EX1 (n = 7), EX2 (n = 9), and EX3 (n = 7). Participants engaged in AEL full squat training once (EX1), twice (EX2), or three times (EX3) per week for 12 weeks. Maximum concentric (CONM), isometric (ISOM), and eccentric strength (ECCM), and strength endurance (SE70), were assessed using the full squat. Muscular power was evaluated through squat jump (SJ) and countermovement jump (CMJ) tests. Muscle cross-sectional area (CSA) was measured via computed tomography, and muscle fiber type proportions by mATP-ase histochemistry.

RESULTS

Across all groups, ISOM (9.1 ± 8.5%), CONM (9.3 ± 5.7%), ECCM (14.0 ± 6.7%), and SE70 (28.6 ± 16.2%) increased significantly (all P < 0.001). SJ improved by 7.3 ± 6.9% (P < 0.001), and CMJ improved by 4.4 ± 6.0% (P = 0.003). Quadriceps CSA increased by 3.6 ± 4.1% (P < 0.001), and thigh CSA increased by 2.1 ± 2.9% (P = 0.005). The only significant between-group difference was that EX3 exhibited a greater increase in CONM compared with EX1 (P = 0.03).

CONCLUSION

Training with AEL resistance exercise one, two, or three times per week for 12 weeks produced similar effects on maximum strength, power, and hypertrophy in resistance-trained athletes.

摘要

目的

本研究探讨每周进行 1 次、2 次或 3 次等剂量加重离心负荷(AEL)抗阻训练对经过抗阻训练的运动员的影响。

方法

23 名力量训练运动员被分配到三个训练组之一:EX1(n = 7)、EX2(n = 9)和 EX3(n = 7)。参与者每周进行 1 次(EX1)、2 次(EX2)或 3 次(EX3)AEL 全蹲训练,共 12 周。使用全蹲评估最大向心力量(CONM)、等长力量(ISOM)和离心力量(ECCM)以及力量耐力(SE70)。通过深蹲跳(SJ)和反向移动跳(CMJ)测试评估肌肉力量。通过计算机断层扫描测量肌肉横截面积(CSA),并通过 mATP 酶组织化学测量肌肉纤维类型比例。

结果

在所有组中,ISOM(9.1±8.5%)、CONM(9.3±5.7%)、ECCM(14.0±6.7%)和 SE70(28.6±16.2%)均显著增加(所有 P < 0.001)。SJ 提高了 7.3±6.9%(P < 0.001),CMJ 提高了 4.4±6.0%(P = 0.003)。股四头肌 CSA 增加了 3.6±4.1%(P < 0.001),大腿 CSA 增加了 2.1±2.9%(P = 0.005)。唯一显著的组间差异是 EX3 与 EX1 相比 CONM 增加幅度更大(P = 0.03)。

结论

每周进行 1 次、2 次或 3 次 AEL 抗阻训练,持续 12 周,对经过抗阻训练的运动员的最大力量、功率和肥大产生相似影响。

相似文献

1
One, two, or three times a week? examining the optimal frequency for strength and muscle growth in accentuated eccentric exercise.一周一次、两次还是三次?探讨强化离心运动中力量和肌肉增长的最佳频率。
Eur J Appl Physiol. 2025 Jun 28. doi: 10.1007/s00421-025-05828-9.
2
Physical exercise training interventions for children and young adults during and after treatment for childhood cancer.针对儿童癌症治疗期间及治疗后的儿童和青少年的体育锻炼训练干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Mar 31;3(3):CD008796. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008796.pub3.
3
Electromyostimulation--a systematic review of the effects of different electromyostimulation methods on selected strength parameters in trained and elite athletes.肌电刺激——不同肌电刺激方法对训练有素和精英运动员某些力量参数影响的系统评价。
J Strength Cond Res. 2012 Sep;26(9):2600-14. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e31823f2cd1.
4
Effects of Supervised vs. Unsupervised Training Programs on Balance and Muscle Strength in Older Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.监督训练与非监督训练方案对老年人平衡和肌肉力量的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Sports Med. 2017 Nov;47(11):2341-2361. doi: 10.1007/s40279-017-0747-6.
5
Exercise for patellar tendinopathy.髌腱病的运动疗法
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 May 27;5:CD013078. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013078.pub2.
6
Effects of unilateral and bilateral complex-contrast training on lower limb strength and jump performance in collegiate female volleyball players.单侧和双侧复合对比训练对大学女子排球运动员下肢力量和跳跃成绩的影响。
PLoS One. 2025 Jun 30;20(6):e0327237. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0327237. eCollection 2025.
7
Chronic Adaptations to Eccentric Training: A Systematic Review.慢性适应对离心训练:系统综述。
Sports Med. 2017 May;47(5):917-941. doi: 10.1007/s40279-016-0628-4.
8
Effect of Plyometric Training on Vertical Jump Performance in Female Athletes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.增强式训练对女性运动员垂直跳跃表现的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Sports Med. 2017 May;47(5):975-986. doi: 10.1007/s40279-016-0634-6.
9
Effects of Resistance Training Frequency on Measures of Muscle Hypertrophy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.抗阻训练频率对肌肉肥大测量指标的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Sports Med. 2016 Nov;46(11):1689-1697. doi: 10.1007/s40279-016-0543-8.
10
Exercise for haemophilia.血友病的运动
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Dec 19;12(12):CD011180. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011180.pub2.

本文引用的文献

1
Dose-Response Modelling of Resistance Exercise Across Outcome Domains in Strength and Conditioning: A Meta-analysis.抗阻运动在力量和体能领域不同结局间的剂量-反应关系建模:一项荟萃分析。
Sports Med. 2024 Jun;54(6):1579-1594. doi: 10.1007/s40279-024-02006-3. Epub 2024 Apr 23.
2
Can muscle typology explain the inter-individual variability in resistance training adaptations?肌体型能否解释抗阻训练适应性的个体间变异性?
J Physiol. 2023 Jun;601(12):2307-2327. doi: 10.1113/JP284442. Epub 2023 Apr 26.
3
Resistance Training Load Effects on Muscle Hypertrophy and Strength Gain: Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis.
抗阻训练负荷对肌肉肥大和力量增益的影响:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2021 Jun 1;53(6):1206-1216. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000002585.
4
Human skeletal muscle fiber type percentage and area after reduced muscle use: A systematic review and meta-analysis.减少肌肉使用后人类骨骼肌纤维类型百分比和面积:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2020 Aug;30(8):1298-1317. doi: 10.1111/sms.13675. Epub 2020 May 4.
5
A Comparison between the Recovery Responses Following an Eccentrically Loaded Bench Press Protocol Vs. Regular Loading in Highly Trained Men.在训练有素的男性中,离心负荷卧推方案与常规负荷后的恢复反应比较。
J Hum Kinet. 2019 Aug 21;68:59-67. doi: 10.2478/hukin-2019-0056. eCollection 2019 Aug.
6
How many times per week should a muscle be trained to maximize muscle hypertrophy? A systematic review and meta-analysis of studies examining the effects of resistance training frequency.每周应该训练多少次肌肉才能最大限度地促进肌肉肥大?一项系统回顾和荟萃分析研究了抗阻训练频率的影响。
J Sports Sci. 2019 Jun;37(11):1286-1295. doi: 10.1080/02640414.2018.1555906. Epub 2018 Dec 17.
7
High-frequency resistance training does not promote greater muscular adaptations compared to low frequencies in young untrained men.高频阻力训练并不比低频训练更能促进年轻未经训练男性的肌肉适应性。
Eur J Sport Sci. 2018 Sep;18(8):1077-1082. doi: 10.1080/17461391.2018.1476590. Epub 2018 May 31.
8
Functional and Muscle-Size Effects of Flywheel Resistance Training with Eccentric-Overload in Professional Handball Players.职业手球运动员采用离心超负荷飞轮抗阻训练的功能及肌肉大小效应
J Hum Kinet. 2017 Dec 28;60:133-143. doi: 10.1515/hukin-2017-0096. eCollection 2017 Dec.
9
Editorial: Physiology and Clinical Potential of Eccentric Exercise.社论:离心运动的生理学及临床潜力
Front Physiol. 2017 Nov 3;8:891. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2017.00891. eCollection 2017.
10
The Effect of Weekly Set Volume on Strength Gain: A Meta-Analysis.每周训练量对力量增长的影响:一项荟萃分析。
Sports Med. 2017 Dec;47(12):2585-2601. doi: 10.1007/s40279-017-0762-7.