Suppr超能文献

肌电刺激——不同肌电刺激方法对训练有素和精英运动员某些力量参数影响的系统评价。

Electromyostimulation--a systematic review of the effects of different electromyostimulation methods on selected strength parameters in trained and elite athletes.

机构信息

Muscle Function Laboratory, Institute of Sport Science and Sport Informatics, German Sport University, Cologne, Germany.

出版信息

J Strength Cond Res. 2012 Sep;26(9):2600-14. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e31823f2cd1.

Abstract

This is the first part of 2 studies that systematically review the current state of research and structure the results of selected electromyostimulation (EMS) studies in a way that makes accurate comparisons possible. This part will focus on the effects of EMS on strength enhancement. On the basis of these results, part 2 will deal with the influence of the training regimen and stimulation parameters on EMS training effectiveness to make recommendations for training control. Out of about 200 studies, 89 trials were selected according to predefined criteria: subject age (<35 years), subject health (unimpaired), EMS type (percutaneous stimulation), and study duration (>7 days). To evaluate these trials, we first defined appropriate categories according to the type of EMS (local or whole body) and type of muscle contraction (isometric, dynamic, isokinetic). Then, we established the most relevant strength parameters for high-performance sports: maximal strength, speed strength, power, jumping and sprinting ability. Unlike former reviews, this study differentiates between 3 categories of subjects based on their level of fitness (untrained subjects, trained subjects, and elite athletes) and on the types of EMS methods used (local, whole-body, combination). Special focus was on trained and elite athletes. Untrained athletes were investigated for comparison purposes. This scientific analysis revealed that EMS is effective for developing physical performance. After a stimulation period of 3-6 weeks, significant gains (p < 0.05) were shown in maximal strength (isometric Fmax +58.8%; dynamic Fmax +79.5%), speed strength (eccentric isokinetic Mmax +37.1%; concentric isokinetic Mmax + 41.3%; rate of force development + 74%; force impulse + 29%; vmax + 19%), and power (+67%). Developing these parameters increases vertical jump height by up to +25% (squat jump +21.4%, countermovement jump +19.2%, drop jump +12%) and improves sprint times by as much as -4.8% in trained and elite athletes. With regard to the level of fitness, the analysis shows that trained and elite athletes, despite their already high level of fitness, are able to significantly enhance their level of strength to same extent as is possible with untrained subjects. The EMS offers a promising alternative to traditional strength training for enhancing the strength parameters and motor abilities described above. Because of the clear-cut advantages in time management, especially when whole-body EMS is used, we can expect this method to see the increasing use in high-performance sports.

摘要

这是两项研究的第一部分,系统地回顾了当前的研究现状,并以一种可以进行准确比较的方式对选定的肌电刺激(EMS)研究结果进行了构建。这部分将重点关注 EMS 对增强力量的影响。基于这些结果,第二部分将讨论训练方案和刺激参数对 EMS 训练效果的影响,以便为训练控制提供建议。在大约 200 项研究中,根据预先确定的标准选择了 89 项试验:受试者年龄(<35 岁)、受试者健康状况(未受损)、EMS 类型(经皮刺激)和研究持续时间(>7 天)。为了评估这些试验,我们首先根据 EMS 的类型(局部或全身)和肌肉收缩的类型(等长、动态、等速)定义了适当的类别。然后,我们确定了最适合高性能运动的相关力量参数:最大力量、速度力量、功率、跳跃和冲刺能力。与之前的综述不同,本研究根据受试者的健康水平(未训练的受试者、训练有素的受试者和精英运动员)和使用的 EMS 方法的类型(局部、全身、组合)将受试者分为 3 个类别。特别关注的是训练有素的和精英运动员。对未训练的运动员进行了调查以作比较。该科学分析表明,EMS 对提高身体表现是有效的。经过 3-6 周的刺激期后,在最大力量(等长 Fmax 增加 58.8%;动态 Fmax 增加 79.5%)、速度力量(离心等速 Mmax 增加 37.1%;向心等速 Mmax 增加 41.3%;力量发展速率增加 74%;力量冲量增加 29%;vmax 增加 19%)和功率(增加 67%)方面都取得了显著的增益(p<0.05)。这些参数的发展使垂直跳跃高度提高了高达 25%(深蹲跳增加 21.4%,反向跳增加 19.2%,下落跳增加 12%),并使训练有素和精英运动员的冲刺时间减少了多达 4.8%。关于健康水平,分析表明,尽管训练有素的和精英运动员的健康水平已经很高,但他们仍然能够以与未训练的受试者相同的程度显著提高他们的力量水平。EMS 为增强上述力量参数和运动能力提供了一种有前途的传统力量训练替代方法。由于在时间管理方面具有明显的优势,特别是在使用全身 EMS 时,我们可以预期这种方法在高性能运动中会越来越受欢迎。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验